U.S. Cities  

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Michigan
Register Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 700,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 15,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads.

Get a detailed profile
Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply


 
Old 08-10-2008, 10:10 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
55 posts, read 52,819 times
Reputation: 24
leadsquirter is on a distinguished road
Default 2007 Michigan Counties Population estimates are in

Annual Estimates of the Population for Counties: April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2007

I think you need excel on your machine to view the data. It is interesting to see what counties are growing, staying the same, or declining since 2000. I'll list the top ten counties in case you can't open it. 2,000 population is listed first then the 2007 estimate.

1. Wayne 2,058,895 1,985,101
2. Oakland 1,196,604 1,206,089
3. Macomb 790,877 831,077
4. Kent 576,495 604,330
5. Genesee 436,876 434,715
6. Washtenaw 324,576 350,003
7. Ingham 279,295 279,206
8. Ottawa 239,467 259,206
9. Kalamazoo 239,058 245,333
10. Saginaw 209,928 202,268
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-10-2008, 11:01 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
12,007 posts, read 5,273,910 times
Reputation: 2931
malamute has a reputation beyond repute
malamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by leadsquirter View Post
Annual Estimates of the Population for Counties: April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2007

I think you need excel on your machine to view the data. It is interesting to see what counties are growing, staying the same, or declining since 2000. I'll list the top ten counties in case you can't open it. 2,000 population is listed first then the 2007 estimate.

1. Wayne 2,058,895 1,985,101
2. Oakland 1,196,604 1,206,089
3. Macomb 790,877 831,077
4. Kent 576,495 604,330
5. Genesee 436,876 434,715
6. Washtenaw 324,576 350,003
7. Ingham 279,295 279,206
8. Ottawa 239,467 259,206
9. Kalamazoo 239,058 245,333
10. Saginaw 209,928 202,268
It doesn't look like the population is really dropping much at all. Rather small drops in just 3 counties.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2008, 07:30 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Charlevoix
514 posts, read 447,792 times
Reputation: 239
Michigansnowflake has a spectacular aura aboutMichigansnowflake has a spectacular aura aboutMichigansnowflake has a spectacular aura aboutMichigansnowflake has a spectacular aura aboutMichigansnowflake has a spectacular aura about
Charlevoix has stayed about the same, give or take 100 or so: 26,181
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2008, 08:13 AM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Grand Rapids Metro
4,573 posts, read 3,333,513 times
Reputation: 946
magellan is a splendid one to beholdmagellan is a splendid one to beholdmagellan is a splendid one to beholdmagellan is a splendid one to beholdmagellan is a splendid one to beholdmagellan is a splendid one to beholdmagellan is a splendid one to beholdmagellan is a splendid one to beholdmagellan is a splendid one to beholdmagellan is a splendid one to beholdmagellan is a splendid one to beholdmagellan is a splendid one to beholdmagellan is a splendid one to beholdmagellan is a splendid one to beholdmagellan is a splendid one to beholdmagellan is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by malamute View Post
It doesn't look like the population is really dropping much at all. Rather small drops in just 3 counties.
Yes, the "mass exodus" terminology used by the media is quite a bit overstated. Last year was probably Michigan's worst year, with population dropping about 30,000 people out of a total pop. of 10 Million:

Michigan Population and Components of Change

It's certainly not good, but when you see talk of "half the state" or even a "quarter of the state" leaving is so far from reality it's quite humorous. Try .3%., or .003, or 3/1000ths.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2008, 08:48 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: East Grand Rapids, MI
622 posts, read 632,879 times
Reputation: 129
suydam will become famous soon enoughsuydam will become famous soon enoughsuydam will become famous soon enough
Part of the issue is that population should really grow.
Births out-number deaths.... so even in tough times, population should go up.
It takes really tough times to have a population decrease.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2008, 08:58 AM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Grand Rapids Metro
4,573 posts, read 3,333,513 times
Reputation: 946
magellan is a splendid one to beholdmagellan is a splendid one to beholdmagellan is a splendid one to beholdmagellan is a splendid one to beholdmagellan is a splendid one to beholdmagellan is a splendid one to beholdmagellan is a splendid one to beholdmagellan is a splendid one to beholdmagellan is a splendid one to beholdmagellan is a splendid one to beholdmagellan is a splendid one to beholdmagellan is a splendid one to beholdmagellan is a splendid one to beholdmagellan is a splendid one to beholdmagellan is a splendid one to beholdmagellan is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by suydam View Post
Part of the issue is that population should really grow.
Births out-number deaths.... so even in tough times, population should go up.
It takes really tough times to have a population decrease.
Agreed. It's certainly not good to have population decline, no matter how small.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2008, 05:17 PM
clear the way!
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
1,678 posts, read 1,139,239 times
Reputation: 448
baystater is just really nicebaystater is just really nicebaystater is just really nicebaystater is just really nicebaystater is just really nicebaystater is just really nicebaystater is just really nicebaystater is just really nicebaystater is just really nice
Quote:
Originally Posted by magellan View Post
Agreed. It's certainly not good to have population decline, no matter how small.
Hey Magellan. Notice Rhode Island again?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2008, 08:33 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: East Grand Rapids, MI
622 posts, read 632,879 times
Reputation: 129
suydam will become famous soon enoughsuydam will become famous soon enoughsuydam will become famous soon enough
Did anyone notice that today's Grand Rapids Press portrayed a totally different picture than these census numbers?

At quick glance I cannot find the URL, but the front page had the headline "Goodbye Michigan" with a map of the state showing that nearly every county had a population decline in 06 vs. 07. The US Census estimates disagree, so I'm left wondering where they got their information.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2008, 09:51 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
12,007 posts, read 5,273,910 times
Reputation: 2931
malamute has a reputation beyond repute
malamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond reputemalamute has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by magellan View Post
Agreed. It's certainly not good to have population decline, no matter how small.
I think it depends on who leaves. I think population decreases could even be good if it's the non-productive or criminal element that leaves but of course that's not usually what happens.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2008, 10:09 PM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Grand Rapids Metro
4,573 posts, read 3,333,513 times
Reputation: 946
magellan is a splendid one to beholdmagellan is a splendid one to beholdmagellan is a splendid one to beholdmagellan is a splendid one to beholdmagellan is a splendid one to beholdmagellan is a splendid one to beholdmagellan is a splendid one to beholdmagellan is a splendid one to beholdmagellan is a splendid one to beholdmagellan is a splendid one to beholdmagellan is a splendid one to beholdmagellan is a splendid one to beholdmagellan is a splendid one to beholdmagellan is a splendid one to beholdmagellan is a splendid one to beholdmagellan is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by suydam View Post
Did anyone notice that today's Grand Rapids Press portrayed a totally different picture than these census numbers?

At quick glance I cannot find the URL, but the front page had the headline "Goodbye Michigan" with a map of the state showing that nearly every county had a population decline in 06 vs. 07. The US Census estimates disagree, so I'm left wondering where they got their information.
I saw that too. The Press was showing "net migration" but making it appear to be population loss. They took the link off their website for some reason.

Kudos for Grand Traverse County for having a positive net migration.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



Reply


Quick Reply
Message:

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads


Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Michigan

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:47 AM.

Copyright © 2005-2009, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 - Top