U.S. Cities  
Happy New Year 2010!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Michigan
Register Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 700,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 15,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads.

Get a detailed profile
Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply


 
Old 11-08-2008, 08:25 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
210 posts, read 230,370 times
Reputation: 40
diamondgirl45 is on a distinguished road
Default Seat Belt law

My husband says that it is ok to drive kids (or anyone) without a seat belt if they are driving slowly...like collecting pop bottles etc during a bottle drive. And getting in and out of a vehicle often.
Is this lawful?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-08-2008, 08:33 PM
Not a member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: MI
1,069 posts, read 513,400 times
Reputation: 460
xlabel is a glorious beacon of lightxlabel is a glorious beacon of lightxlabel is a glorious beacon of lightxlabel is a glorious beacon of lightxlabel is a glorious beacon of lightxlabel is a glorious beacon of lightxlabel is a glorious beacon of lightxlabel is a glorious beacon of lightxlabel is a glorious beacon of light
I seriously doubt it. I know in FL newspaper carriers and postal workers are exempt. I'd check state statutes. I think now that DUI arrests have tapered off some, seatbelt ticketing is the latest craze for law enforcement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2008, 06:27 AM
Trolls hate me.
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: West Michigan
7,538 posts, read 5,045,579 times
Reputation: 8024
Bydand has a reputation beyond reputeBydand has a reputation beyond reputeBydand has a reputation beyond reputeBydand has a reputation beyond repute
Bydand has a reputation beyond reputeBydand has a reputation beyond reputeBydand has a reputation beyond reputeBydand has a reputation beyond reputeBydand has a reputation beyond reputeBydand has a reputation beyond reputeBydand has a reputation beyond reputeBydand has a reputation beyond reputeBydand has a reputation beyond reputeBydand has a reputation beyond reputeBydand has a reputation beyond reputeBydand has a reputation beyond reputeBydand has a reputation beyond reputeBydand has a reputation beyond repute
What he is referring to is the section of the seat belt law that is made for delivery personnel. It is commonly misused and min-interpreted as any vehicle including kids for bottle drives and such, but the exemption does NOT include personal vehicles at all. It is for Commercial and/or Postal Vehicles only.

Here is the seat belt law in Michigan: Michigan Legislature

The part he is thinking of is Section 710e paragraph "1-g".

There are exemptions that apply to personal vehicles. If you have more passengers than belts and all available belts are being used then you are still in compliance. I don't think I would want to try that one though personally.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2008, 02:46 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Lovely Lansing
187 posts, read 155,701 times
Reputation: 43
GlassPipe is on a distinguished road
ha - welcome to the facist states of america. lol, we even have laws that say what you can and cannot say in front of women and children. Just ask that poor bastard from Standish. We have so many stupid "Nanny" laws it's not even funny.

But to answer your question - if a cop wants to be a dink, he can write you up. But if he's not on some ridiculous power trip, like so many of them are, you won't be harassed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2008, 07:02 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
4,436 posts, read 2,583,050 times
Reputation: 1482
Driller1 has much to be proud ofDriller1 has much to be proud ofDriller1 has much to be proud ofDriller1 has much to be proud ofDriller1 has much to be proud ofDriller1 has much to be proud ofDriller1 has much to be proud ofDriller1 has much to be proud ofDriller1 has much to be proud ofDriller1 has much to be proud ofDriller1 has much to be proud ofDriller1 has much to be proud ofDriller1 has much to be proud ofDriller1 has much to be proud ofDriller1 has much to be proud ofDriller1 has much to be proud ofDriller1 has much to be proud ofDriller1 has much to be proud ofDriller1 has much to be proud ofDriller1 has much to be proud ofDriller1 has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by GlassPipe View Post
ha - welcome to the facist states of america. lol, we even have laws that say what you can and cannot say in front of women and children. Just ask that poor bastard from Standish. We have so many stupid "Nanny" laws it's not even funny.

But to answer your question - if a cop wants to be a dink, he can write you up. But if he's not on some ridiculous power trip, like so many of them are, you won't be harassed.
If you mean the "cussing canoeist". It was over turned. The conviction, not the canoe. LOL
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2008, 03:00 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
210 posts, read 230,370 times
Reputation: 40
diamondgirl45 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bydand View Post
What he is referring to is the section of the seat belt law that is made for delivery personnel. It is commonly misused and min-interpreted as any vehicle including kids for bottle drives and such, but the exemption does NOT include personal vehicles at all. It is for Commercial and/or Postal Vehicles only.

Here is the seat belt law in Michigan: Michigan Legislature

The part he is thinking of is Section 710e paragraph "1-g".

There are exemptions that apply to personal vehicles. If you have more passengers than belts and all available belts are being used then you are still in compliance. I don't think I would want to try that one though personally.
I am in total agreement with children being buckled up, especially if they are being driven around by someone else. I thought the law must apply to adults, and not children, thank you for confirming that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2008, 06:19 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
865 posts, read 496,641 times
Reputation: 304
UpperPeninsulaRon is a jewel in the roughUpperPeninsulaRon is a jewel in the roughUpperPeninsulaRon is a jewel in the roughUpperPeninsulaRon is a jewel in the roughUpperPeninsulaRon is a jewel in the roughUpperPeninsulaRon is a jewel in the roughUpperPeninsulaRon is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by diamondgirl45 View Post
I am in total agreement with children being buckled up, especially if they are being driven around by someone else. I thought the law must apply to adults, and not children, thank you for confirming that.
Who cares if it lawful or not? We're talking about making children into projectiles here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2008, 08:03 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
210 posts, read 230,370 times
Reputation: 40
diamondgirl45 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by UpperPeninsulaRon View Post
Who cares if it lawful or not? We're talking about making children into projectiles here.
I am with you completely on this!!! And it doesn't matter how slow he was driving if another vehicle hit HIM.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-13-2008, 02:30 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Lovely Lansing
187 posts, read 155,701 times
Reputation: 43
GlassPipe is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Driller1 View Post
If you mean the "cussing canoeist". It was over turned. The conviction, not the canoe. LOL
Yep, that would be the one. Boy, the northern michigan media sure had fun with that one. All they could talk about for weeks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-13-2008, 06:30 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
4,436 posts, read 2,583,050 times
Reputation: 1482
Driller1 has much to be proud ofDriller1 has much to be proud ofDriller1 has much to be proud ofDriller1 has much to be proud ofDriller1 has much to be proud ofDriller1 has much to be proud ofDriller1 has much to be proud ofDriller1 has much to be proud ofDriller1 has much to be proud ofDriller1 has much to be proud ofDriller1 has much to be proud ofDriller1 has much to be proud ofDriller1 has much to be proud ofDriller1 has much to be proud ofDriller1 has much to be proud ofDriller1 has much to be proud ofDriller1 has much to be proud ofDriller1 has much to be proud ofDriller1 has much to be proud ofDriller1 has much to be proud ofDriller1 has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by GlassPipe View Post
Yep, that would be the one. Boy, the northern michigan media sure had fun with that one. All they could talk about for weeks.
Court TV was there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



Reply


Quick Reply
Message:

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads


Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Michigan

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:05 AM.

Copyright © 2005-2009, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 - Top