U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Military Life and Issues
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-09-2017, 04:46 PM
 
Location: Middle America
31,385 posts, read 31,720,063 times
Reputation: 39367

Advertisements

Every article I have read so far regarding disciplinary action in these cases has been accompanied by the usual (if predictable) comment sections full of "boys will be boys" commentary...much of it, stating that verbatim.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-09-2017, 06:23 PM
 
Location: San Diego CA
2,238 posts, read 1,962,557 times
Reputation: 3538
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffdoorgunner View Post
So i'm assuming you felt the same way about Playboy magazine............?

False equivalency. Try again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2017, 07:47 PM
 
2,809 posts, read 890,223 times
Reputation: 5149
Quote:
Originally Posted by Submariner View Post

Our local high school has less than 100 students in each graduating class. Every time one of the girls distributes a selfie, I am assuming it is the parents of the boys who are then active in trying to get copies deleted. [at least that was what I did, when I found a few dozen selfies on my son's PC. I recognized the faces of our local teen girls. It was time for a long talk with my son about the consequences of possessing child porn].
Those girls could also be charged with distributing child porn, since they were creating and distributing pics of themselves and distributing them to underaged boys. So if charges are brought forth, it shouldn't only be the boys getting charged.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2017, 08:54 PM
 
2,402 posts, read 1,106,131 times
Reputation: 1856
Quote:
Originally Posted by msgsing View Post
False equivalency. Try again.

Whats the difference..........men/women looking at pictures of Men/women
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2017, 09:40 PM
 
Location: the coastal bend
3,765 posts, read 2,065,330 times
Reputation: 4929
Quote:
Originally Posted by Submariner View Post
I do not understand the purpose of selfies.
Gratification of the ego. Sharing selfies is a form of attention-seeking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2017, 09:07 AM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
206 posts, read 75,761 times
Reputation: 320
Quote:
Originally Posted by tassity22 View Post
Those girls could also be charged with distributing child porn, since they were creating and distributing pics of themselves and distributing them to underaged boys. So if charges are brought forth, it shouldn't only be the boys getting charged.
But this is the military so this won't happen. Just like what happens when a woman files a false rape charge against someone else and NCIS finds out that it's false. They hardly ever file charges against the woman because they "don't want the appearance of going after rape victims", and yes I have seen that first hand.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2017, 06:22 AM
 
1,604 posts, read 981,958 times
Reputation: 2324
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Caldwell View Post
They are grown women and can do what they want to do. They didn't enlist because they are blushing virgins. The morality cops should just shut up and color.

But they did enlist knowing that there were moral standards expected. So... nobody's going to just shut up because these people decide they don't want to honor their commitment. And especially if the PC cops decide they want to dispense "Just-US" kind of justice and only punish the men who look at the pictures and not the women who produce the pictures. They are being the worst kind of morality police: SELECTIVE morality police.

Sounds like the war on drugs in a lot of ways.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2017, 02:12 PM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
40,186 posts, read 43,812,824 times
Reputation: 23275
My surprise is they apparently did not post nude pictures of male soldiers. Some of those guys are really hunky.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2017, 11:17 AM
 
Location: Hard aground in the Sonoran Desert
4,153 posts, read 6,388,784 times
Reputation: 5238
While I would never post someones naked picture and don't agree with them doing it, I'm not too concerned about this. If some woman lets me take a naked picture of her then what I do with it is my business, the picture now belongs to me. I would never want a naked picture of me floating around the internet so I never have and would never let anyone take a naked picture of me. If I allow naked pictures of myself to be taken I can't then be concerned that others are seeing them.

We have sissified the military with all this PC crap. Some guy or girl lets someone take naked pictures of them it is because OTHERS want to see them naked so don't get upset when others are looking at them.

If the military wants to address it then they should do so but it should be done quietly and not turn it into a PC political show in the media and with the public.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2017, 02:41 PM
 
Location: Tampa, FL
22,623 posts, read 19,071,231 times
Reputation: 9701
Quote:
Originally Posted by LBTRS View Post
While I would never post someones naked picture and don't agree with them doing it, I'm not too concerned about this. If some woman lets me take a naked picture of her then what I do with it is my business, the picture now belongs to me. I would never want a naked picture of me floating around the internet so I never have and would never let anyone take a naked picture of me. If I allow naked pictures of myself to be taken I can't then be concerned that others are seeing them.

We have sissified the military with all this PC crap. Some guy or girl lets someone take naked pictures of them it is because OTHERS want to see them naked so don't get upset when others are looking at them.

If the military wants to address it then they should do so but it should be done quietly and not turn it into a PC political show in the media and with the public.
posted similar view- grandstanding politicians grilling General Officers over something nearly impossible to control....as I posted, even Fed Employees who work for Senators and Congressman are posting online or surfing illicit websites under their noses on gov't computers.....we have bigger nuts to crack (ISIS, N. Korea, Iraq)...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $99,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Military Life and Issues
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2017, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 - Top