U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Wisconsin > Milwaukee
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Would You Favor A Freeway Bridge Over LK Michigan to Muskegon?
Yes, I wouldn't have to go through Chicago anymore 35 53.03%
No, I'm a party pooper! 31 46.97%
Voters: 66. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-06-2009, 07:24 PM
 
Location: Mequon, WI
7,510 posts, read 18,345,811 times
Reputation: 3855

Advertisements

If it were possible would you favor a freeway bridge over Lake Michigan from downtown Milwaukee to Muskegon,MI for travelers from Detroit to Twin Cities and just tourist as well. Plus you could bypass Chicago traffic if you were to head east, then think how easy it would be for packer fans to travel to Detroit?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-06-2009, 07:37 PM
 
Location: Blankity-blank!
11,447 posts, read 13,537,644 times
Reputation: 6856
Buy an amphibious car.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2009, 07:44 PM
 
Location: Mequon, WI
7,510 posts, read 18,345,811 times
Reputation: 3855
I know it's 80 miles across but if it were possible?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2009, 08:04 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
4,028 posts, read 6,074,755 times
Reputation: 1297
Never! It would ruin Lake Michigan!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2009, 08:21 PM
 
Location: Mequon, WI
7,510 posts, read 18,345,811 times
Reputation: 3855
I don't think one 4 lane bridge would ruin the lake, I say let the speed limit be 90mph so we could get across real fast! But I bet if they would propose a commuter rail line over the Lake you would be in favor of it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2009, 09:17 PM
 
Location: FLG/PHX/MKE
7,290 posts, read 12,336,910 times
Reputation: 11481
Not really, because it would be a colossal toilet for tax dollars, although would add a lot of traffic to the area.

It would be quite an engineering feat and it's interesting to consider for me, only on that merit. The longest bridge in the world is 33 miles long, and that is built over land. The second longest is 24 miles and built over very shallow water (Lake Ponchatrain). We're talking about an 80 mile long bridge over 300 foot deep water.

The Channel Tunnel linking France and England, passing under the English Channel, is 30-something miles, and about 250 feet below the surface of the ocean, since the channel is much more shallow at that point. I guess a tunnel would be possible, although it would have to be buried far deeper than the Channel Tunnel.

It was interesting to consider.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2009, 09:29 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
4,028 posts, read 6,074,755 times
Reputation: 1297
Quote:
Originally Posted by Milwaukee City View Post
I don't think one 4 lane bridge would ruin the lake, I say let the speed limit be 90mph so we could get across real fast! But I bet if they would propose a commuter rail line over the Lake you would be in favor of it.
I would not. Lake Michigan is a special case but if Canada was part of the USA I would not support a bridge or tunnel on any of the lakes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2009, 07:31 AM
 
395 posts, read 1,598,994 times
Reputation: 239
What about a bridge connecting NYC to London, across the North Atlantic? Or Tokyo-Anchorage-Seattle ... that would be awesome!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2009, 11:22 AM
 
4,465 posts, read 6,661,989 times
Reputation: 789
Has anyone out there ever sailed on Lake Mich?

I don't mean 30 minutes on a waverunner in a sheltered harbor in July?

The open water in Nov., or Jan is what I mean.

We're just not understanding what approx 1200 cubic miles of water spread out over 22,400 sq miles is capable of.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2009, 11:28 AM
 
Location: Portland OR
1,770 posts, read 2,515,500 times
Reputation: 2053
I gotta go to China for business a few times a year. Last year I drove over the newly opened, Ningbo to Shanghai bridge. It is a 22 mile span across the opening of a large bay that empties into the china sea. Before the bridge it was a several hour drive around the bay or one had to fly.

Hey - maybe you can get the Obamatron to put some of our tax money into this project as part of his all gov't stimulus package!! He seems to think gov't can solve every other issue in life.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Options
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2016 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Wisconsin > Milwaukee
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2017, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 - Top