U.S. Cities  

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Minnesota > Minneapolis - St. Paul
Register Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Minneapolis - St. Paul Twin Cities

Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 700,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 15,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads.

Get a detailed profile
Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply


 
Old 09-23-2008, 09:40 AM
I'd rather be fishing
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Mahtomedi
715 posts, read 478,155 times
Reputation: 181
Clifford63 has a spectacular aura aboutClifford63 has a spectacular aura aboutClifford63 has a spectacular aura aboutClifford63 has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben Around View Post
Yes, of course its purpose is to bring traffic across the river and it does that quite well. But my point is that all the hype and public proclamations of what a great aesthetic design the new bridge would have just never materialized. It has all the drama of the Hwy 36 bridge over Snelling Avenue, the Franklin Avenue bridge over 280, the Lexington Parkway Bridge over 94, and hundreds of other boring bridges here in the TC and coast to coast. Hell, the bike bridge over Hiawatha Avenue has a more impressive design!

PS: Do you think people get "distracted" on the Golden Gate Bridge or the Brooklyn Bridge? Do you guys care about aesthetics at all, or must all public projects display Soviet-style functionality?.
yea sure I care about astetics, but they did run the design through a rigourous approval procces, and there were no secrets.

My priorties were safety, rebuilding it fast, and cost. The Feds gave X dollars to put up a new one, and I am not really interested in kicking in more tax dollars to build a pretty bridge.

In my opinion it has a modern type look that is reasonably appealing and better looking than the old bridge.

Given the circumstances, we are very lucky to have a new bridge in place so soon.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-23-2008, 10:02 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
335 posts, read 309,699 times
Reputation: 110
Haver will become famous soon enoughHaver will become famous soon enoughHaver will become famous soon enough
If the road was straight and didn't have a lot of merging traffic and volume was light and speeds were in the sedate 40 mph range and the road didn't run through a neighborhood with more than its share of sketchy, marginal drivers (university students, etc) then yeah, bump up the aesthetics, give me something to look at. But that's one scary stretch of road. So ... Da, Komrade!! Make it all bland and gray for the greater glory of the people's collective!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply


Quick Reply
Message:

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads


Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Minnesota > Minneapolis - St. Paul

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:44 AM.

Copyright © 2005-2009, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 - Top