U.S. Cities  

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Minnesota > Minneapolis - St. Paul
Register Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Minneapolis - St. Paul Twin Cities

Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 700,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 15,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads.

Get a detailed profile
Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply


 
Old 09-27-2008, 11:41 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: WA
2,281 posts, read 2,848,272 times
Reputation: 680
cdelena is a splendid one to beholdcdelena is a splendid one to beholdcdelena is a splendid one to beholdcdelena is a splendid one to beholdcdelena is a splendid one to beholdcdelena is a splendid one to beholdcdelena is a splendid one to beholdcdelena is a splendid one to beholdcdelena is a splendid one to beholdcdelena is a splendid one to beholdcdelena is a splendid one to beholdcdelena is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minnehahapolitan View Post
You really have no idea what you are talking about. Your B's should be M's first of all. $30 million is the cost of a mile of streetcar, while light rail costs more than that.
Secondly, there is no system of transportation that is self-sustaining. It is not economically feasible for a homeowner or business owner to pay for a sidewalk. My walk down a city street is subsidized by taxes. Certainly, a tangled system of roads and freeways requires constant subsidy in order to function (or do you plow the road you drive on yourself and fill its potholes in the spring?) I could paddleboat to work and still have to rely on the function of the the Minneapolis and Hidden Falls locks and dams.
Actually, come to think of it, bikes would require no subsidy. They can be rode on unpaved surfaces and require litte supporting infrastructure.
So while it may be difficult for you to rationalize as a taxpayer, it is even more difficult to rationalize a position on which you had a predetermined conclusion.
You are right, I was dealing with a bridge project that was estimated in the billions and should have been millions so I had B on my mind... all the numbers are in the right range if you will substitute an M for the B. Sorry.

I am not arguing that transportation infrastructure should not be subsidized by tax payers but more warning of the scale and the cost/benefit for the majority of the population. Rail just happens to cost the majority a notable amount to benefit a minority of the population.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-27-2008, 07:00 PM
The City of Lakes
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
2,499 posts, read 2,169,025 times
Reputation: 548
Minnehahapolitan is a glorious beacon of lightMinnehahapolitan is a glorious beacon of lightMinnehahapolitan is a glorious beacon of lightMinnehahapolitan is a glorious beacon of lightMinnehahapolitan is a glorious beacon of lightMinnehahapolitan is a glorious beacon of lightMinnehahapolitan is a glorious beacon of lightMinnehahapolitan is a glorious beacon of lightMinnehahapolitan is a glorious beacon of lightMinnehahapolitan is a glorious beacon of light
It is a diversity of transportation options that is beneficial to a society as a whole. While I seldom use freeways to move about the Cities personally, they allow goods and services to move more easily. That is why I will always support freeway projects that do not promote further physical growth with my tax money, regardless of my use. While Metro Transit only serves 250,000 rides per day, it allows that many people to not have to use the road system. That is the equivalent of I-94, or two I-494s. That benefits you. A good transit system also allows for a healthier city core. Even if you live thirty miles out of the city, that directly benefits you and your property values. The analogy I always use to illustrate that point is the "Saint Louis model"; you could get the same house in Saint Louis and it may only cost you half or 3/4th of what it does in Minneapolis. Minneapolis is a healthier city, and it draws people and ideas to it that benefit us all. To maintain Minneapolis as a healthy city, measures such as development of public transit must be taken.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply


Quick Reply
Message:

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads


Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Minnesota > Minneapolis - St. Paul

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:11 AM.

Copyright © 2005-2009, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 - Top