Let me give you an example. This was run by the Star Tribune's nation section and is based on an Associated Press story:
Police in Ohio say boy, 3, apparently shot self to death accidentally with father's handgun
Last update: July 23, 2009 - 10:20 AM
VANDALIA, Ohio - Police say a 3-year-old southwest Ohio boy has died after apparently shooting himself in the face with his father's gun.
The boy's mother said in a 911 call Tuesday afternoon that William McAnaul pulled the trigger after he found the 9 mm handgun under a bed in the family's home in the Dayton suburb of Vandalia. He died at a Dayton hospital later in the day.
Vandalia city spokesman Rich Hopkins calls it an "absolutely tragic accident." Police Lt. Harry Busse said Wednesday that details of the shooting would not be released until the investigation was complete.
The Montgomery County Coroner's Office says autopsy results are pending.
Now as you can see from this article the general questions are all answered:
Who: A 3 year old southwest Ohio boy
What: shot himself to death
When: Tuesday afternoon
Where: Vandalia, a suburb of Dayton, OH, died in a nearby hospital later that day
Why: Presumably an accident
How: Found a 9mm handgun under his father's bed and shot himself with it.
The only other thing mentioned was a direct quote about the incident made by a spokesman of the city.
The story is very basic and informative based on the facts that were released by authorities. I don't understand how these types of stories could have any kind of bias unless you want to make very subjective claims based on the verbiage used, etc.