U.S. Cities  

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Montana
Register Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 700,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 15,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads.

Get a detailed profile
Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply


 
Old 04-13-2009, 10:12 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
2 posts, read 699 times
Reputation: 10
Westward Bound 23 is on a distinguished road
Default Chances of Malmstrom AFB closing with nuke reduction

As my wife and I have considered various western cities trying to find the right place for our family Great Falls has seemed to be a good fit for us. However, before pursuing GF further I have a question about the future of the economy there.

According to the Great Falls Tribune the AFB is responsible for 35% of the economic base there. With President Obama talking so much recently about reducing our nuclear arsenal from about 6,000 to 1,000 nukes and eventually zero, what will be the fate of Malmstrom?

Communities - Great Falls Tribune - www.greatfallstribune.com

Some minor background info; Malmstrom currently has 200 missiles (ICBMs) but is being downsized to 150 over the next year or so. Managing the ICBMs in the Montana missile field is Malmstrom’s primary role. There are two other bases (Minot AFB in ND and Warren AFB in Cheyenne, WY) that have 150 ICBMs each for a total of 450 ICBMs.

Although GF seems like a great place, I would hate to move there and make a large investment in my business only to have the AFB close in 10 years or so and have to leave the city due to economic meltdown. With Malmstrom making such a large contribution to the economy it is a vital part of the economy in GF.

Any thoughts? Is anyone aware of anything the city is trying to do to diversify the economy? I'll be interested to read what you have to say.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-13-2009, 10:38 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
94 posts, read 50,102 times
Reputation: 23
anthonyr is on a distinguished road
In my opinion, Great Falls is a dying town.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2009, 09:36 AM
Knot T Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Mayberry Montana.
4,338 posts, read 3,110,258 times
Reputation: 1973
rickers has a brilliant future
rickers has a brilliant futurerickers has a brilliant futurerickers has a brilliant futurerickers has a brilliant future
Quote:
Originally Posted by anthonyr View Post
In my opinion, Great Falls is a dying town.
I don't think it's dying it just has a fever. Great Falls is not going to dry up and blow away. Just wait until the economy swings back up and all the bargains that can be found there will get bought up. If I had more capital to work with I would be scooping up little fixers there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2009, 12:29 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Billings, MT
351 posts, read 195,437 times
Reputation: 188
Redraven has a spectacular aura aboutRedraven has a spectacular aura aboutRedraven has a spectacular aura aboutRedraven has a spectacular aura about
The first problem is the assumption that Mr. O will be able to do what he is talking abut doing. His record of kept promises isn't that great at the moment, we'll just have to wait and see.
The second problem is that the base is about one third of the total Great Falls economy. Much of the rest if agriculture. THAT isn't going to go away anytime soon.
There is always the possiblility that other uses could be found for the base if it closed. the Air Guard could move off Gore Hill and use the base. Industry could be brought in. the housing could be used.
The town of Great Falls will still be there, base or no base. Some adjustments will have to be made, to be sure, but the people of that area are resilient, they can rise to the occasion and keep going.
Besides, us retirees will raise hell with Congress if they try to take away the only commissary and exchange we have, not to mention the other facilities that we utilize.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2009, 11:26 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
2 posts, read 699 times
Reputation: 10
Westward Bound 23 is on a distinguished road
Default Any other opinions?

Thanks for the input. Would anyone else like to offer their opinion? Is anyone aware of any measures the city is taking to diversify their economy?


Quote:
Originally Posted by Westward Bound 23 View Post
As my wife and I have considered various western cities trying to find the right place for our family Great Falls has seemed to be a good fit for us. However, before pursuing GF further I have a question about the future of the economy there.

According to the Great Falls Tribune the AFB is responsible for 35% of the economic base there. With President Obama talking so much recently about reducing our nuclear arsenal from about 6,000 to 1,000 nukes and eventually zero, what will be the fate of Malmstrom?

Communities - Great Falls Tribune - www.greatfallstribune.com

Some minor background info; Malmstrom currently has 200 missiles (ICBMs) but is being downsized to 150 over the next year or so. Managing the ICBMs in the Montana missile field is Malmstrom’s primary role. There are two other bases (Minot AFB in ND and Warren AFB in Cheyenne, WY) that have 150 ICBMs each for a total of 450 ICBMs.

Although GF seems like a great place, I would hate to move there and make a large investment in my business only to have the AFB close in 10 years or so and have to leave the city due to economic meltdown. With Malmstrom making such a large contribution to the economy it is a vital part of the economy in GF.

Any thoughts? Is anyone aware of anything the city is trying to do to diversify the economy? I'll be interested to read what you have to say.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2009, 04:51 PM
Heavily armed, easily bored, & off the medication
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Brendansport, Sagitta IV
2,312 posts, read 1,156,842 times
Reputation: 480
Reziac is a glorious beacon of lightReziac is a glorious beacon of lightReziac is a glorious beacon of lightReziac is a glorious beacon of lightReziac is a glorious beacon of lightReziac is a glorious beacon of lightReziac is a glorious beacon of lightReziac is a glorious beacon of lightReziac is a glorious beacon of lightReziac is a glorious beacon of light
Quote:
Originally Posted by Westward Bound 23 View Post
Thanks for the input. Would anyone else like to offer their opinion? Is anyone aware of any measures the city is taking to diversify their economy?
I'd say it's a wheat and cattle industry hub first and foremost, and so long as people want to eat that's going to be there, even if Malmstrom dried up and blew away.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



Reply


Quick Reply
Message:

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads


Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Montana

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:09 PM.

Copyright © 2005-2009, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 - Top