|

07-23-2009, 12:18 PM
|
|
I am downright amazed at what I can destroy
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bethel, Alaska
14,502 posts, read 5,673,023 times
Reputation: 5685
|
|
Wolf Hunting
I'm wondering if the peta freaks are going to do to Montana what they have tried to do to Alaska: try ban tourism in Montana for the upcoming wolf hunting? For years they have tried to do this in Alaska for the controlled hunting up here and now I see that along with Montana, Idaho is getting ready for the hunts. I wonder if they have models running naked in towns in the larger cities with banners saying, "we'd rather wear nothing over wearing fur!"
If they don't, why do they only pick on Alaska?
|
|

07-23-2009, 01:12 PM
|
|
Knot T Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Mayberry Montana.
4,155 posts, read 2,899,777 times
Reputation: 1851
|
|
|
|
|

07-23-2009, 05:22 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: MT
122 posts, read 98,558 times
Reputation: 57
|
|
|
I'm going to buy a wolf tag just to support the system. Even if I don't even see any wolves out here in eastern MT. But, maybe my purchase of the wolf tag would bring these nake models out here.
|
|

07-23-2009, 05:35 PM
|
|
Knot T Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Mayberry Montana.
4,155 posts, read 2,899,777 times
Reputation: 1851
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mtboy
maybe my purchase of the wolf tag would bring these nake models out here.
|
Well my nets are all mended so I figure if they can have a donkey show in TJ we should be able to have a wolf show.  We'll set it up right next to the house of mystery or the drive through the bears ! 
|
|

07-24-2009, 12:26 PM
|
|
Heavily armed, easily bored, & off the medication
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Brendansport, Sagitta IV
2,201 posts, read 1,045,799 times
Reputation: 449
|
|
The Fur Commission site makes a good point: Fur is a renewable, sustainable resource. The waste (stripped carcasses) go back into feed for the animals, and fur does not use ANY nonrenewable resources -- no oil or coal required, unlike synthetic fabrics (which are essentially a form of plastic, which is largely oil). And fur/leather is recyclable and biodegradable, too.
So -- a true conservationist (or a sane environmentalist, if there is such a creature) supports the use of fur and leather, being less costly to the environment than synthetics.
|
|

07-24-2009, 03:10 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: NW MT
294 posts, read 97,315 times
Reputation: 89
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reziac
So -- a true conservationist supports the use of fur and leather, being less costly to the environment than synthetics.
|
Absolutely!
|
|

07-26-2009, 08:34 AM
|
|
Knot T Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Mayberry Montana.
4,155 posts, read 2,899,777 times
Reputation: 1851
|
|
|
Tanneries are very polluting and it may be nonsense to presume that it would be better for the environment to quit using synthetics and use leather and fur for the products we use. The fur commission has an agenda just like everybody else. I know I certainly can't afford to buy leather clothing but it would be nice to be able to buy a nice shiny fur coat for my wife made out of Black Lab fur !!! My ex wife had a full length coyote fur coat and it was beautiful.
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|