Blade runner 2049 (film, Hollywood, director, music)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
When Scott was asked about the possibility of a sequel in October 2012, he said, "It's not a rumor—it's happening. With Harrison Ford? I don't know yet. Is he too old? Well, he was a Nexus-6 so we don't know how long he can live. And that's all I'm going to say at this stage."
When Scott was asked about the possibility of a sequel in October 2012, he said, "It's not a rumor—it's happening. With Harrison Ford? I don't know yet. Is he too old? Well, he was a Nexus-6 so we don't know how long he can live. And that's all I'm going to say at this stage."
I know that Ridley Scott has been trying to make Deckard a replicant for years --- for no apparent reason other than Scott likes the gimmick.
But the director of the sequel isn't so onboard with that.
Why is Hollywood so insistent on making sequels to movies that stand alone beautifully? The original Blade Runner hardly needs a sequel! Nothing we're likely to see in this sequel will equal (much less improve on) the original film.
The music will be one of the most important things to this movie being a good sequel. I will give them the benefit of the doubt and am hoping this will be good.
The music will be one of the most important things to this movie being a good sequel. I will give them the benefit of the doubt and am hoping this will be good.
Lower your expectations down to zero. Unless they invite Vangelis back to do it, I'm not expecting the same magic to be, er, replicated.
Why is Hollywood so insistent on making sequels to movies that stand alone beautifully? The original Blade Runner hardly needs a sequel! Nothing we're likely to see in this sequel will equal (much less improve on) the original film.
Because they have been so brainwashed/conditioned this is all they can do now..... TAKE ORIGINAL THINGS THAT ARE GOOD AND MAKE THEM CRAP...... (And they think its GOOD because of the fake reality they have been forced to live)
Because they have been so brainwashed/conditioned this is all they can do now..... TAKE ORIGINAL THINGS THAT ARE GOOD AND MAKE THEM CRAP...... (And they think its GOOD because of the fake reality they have been forced to live)
Its a business and they are making business decisions when they make new movies, particularly the mega budget tent pole movies. When you commit millions of dollars to a new movie how can you increase your chance to get a decent ROI? Tie it to an already successful film is one answer.
Why is Hollywood so insistent on making sequels to movies that stand alone beautifully? The original Blade Runner hardly needs a sequel! Nothing we're likely to see in this sequel will equal (much less improve on) the original film.
Maybe all those people and companies that invest tens of millions of dollars in a film actually want to make a profit, and understand the nature of branding.
I agree that Blade Runner hardly needs a sequel. So I won't see the sequel. Thus, for me it's exactly the same as if this sequel was never made. Thus, I don't see the problem.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
*
