Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Entertainment and Arts > Music
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-18-2012, 07:19 PM
 
5,460 posts, read 7,761,278 times
Reputation: 4631

Advertisements

With the advent of technologies like satellite radio, iPod, etc., that allow people to listen to a much more diverse variety of musical styles on a practical basis than was formerly possible with AM and FM radio technologies, why are most people still "stuck" on only the latest and greatest and/or most recent decade's style, of music? For example, with satellite radio, people can listen to virtually almost any genre they want or even of a specific decade, say 50's, 60's, 70's, 80's, 90's, and 2000+. If a person only wants to listen to 80's music, s/he can change the station via satellite radio to a station devoted exclusively to 80's music. Granted, with the older AM and FM radio technologies, listeners were constrained to whatever radio stations happened to believe was worth playing, and many radio stations would phase out many, many popular older songs from their updated playlists, which was quite unfortunate, IMO, since it deprived the newer generations from having a realistic chance to experience certain songs that were very popular and huge hits, as far back as say 5-10 years previously.

But since we are no longer bound by the limitations of radio executives arbitrarily deciding what is hip or cool to play during a certain decade, why are many still acting like only the latest, most contemporary songs are "cool" or worth listening to, while the older hits are passé? In the modern era of music, why isn't more music regarded as timeless, instead of disposable after only a few years?

Last edited by Phoenix2017; 11-18-2012 at 07:42 PM.. Reason: Corrected typos
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-18-2012, 08:33 PM
 
Location: Central Bay Area, CA as of Jan 2010...but still a proud Texan from Houston!
7,484 posts, read 10,448,062 times
Reputation: 8955
Possibly the dumbing down of humans who were already clueless to start off with?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2012, 11:21 PM
 
Location: SoCal
1,528 posts, read 4,233,028 times
Reputation: 1243
This is timeless ;


Cibo Matto - Sugar Water (Video) - YouTube
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Entertainment and Arts > Music

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:52 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top