Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Entertainment and Arts > Music
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-29-2014, 08:40 AM
 
Location: Philaburbia
41,958 posts, read 75,192,887 times
Reputation: 66918

Advertisements

Why am I not surprised that you confuse popularity with quality?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-29-2014, 08:47 AM
 
16,431 posts, read 22,198,807 times
Reputation: 9623
Quote:
Originally Posted by RD5050 View Post
Best album is "Forever Changes"?

Who is "Love"?

I've never even heard of them?
They were The Doors early competition for local gigs in LA. The Doors made it to the big time, Love didn't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2014, 09:30 AM
 
Location: North Oakland
9,150 posts, read 10,894,540 times
Reputation: 14503
Quote:
Originally Posted by RD5050 View Post
I just began listening to Forever Changes myself from the previous YouTube link, and I can see exactly what Rolling Stone Magazine's reviewer meant.

Here is my own review:

The 1st track is seriously lacking in melody during the vocal parts.

The 2nd track is the same. Vocals lack melody. Guitar solos are simplistic and non-melodic. Only thing decent is the drumming.

The 3rd track is slow and boring. Melody is poor. Vocals are mediocre. It's a completely forgettable song.

The 4th track sounds like The Who, but not nearly as good. Again, melody is lacking.

The 5th track, vocals are again mediocre. Again, melody is all over the place.

I've heard enough ....
You probably prefer McDonald's and chain restaurants, too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2014, 09:59 AM
 
4,449 posts, read 4,618,183 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
They were The Doors early competition for local gigs in LA. The Doors made
it to the big time, Love didn't.
Yeah for sure. A little promo and travel maybe could've worked as far as publicity for the band. I don't believe many got to hear their stuff. I know FM radio played them but that's about it. They certainly weren't an 'AM' radio band. They were a bit different than Petey Noone and his 'Ermits....;-)...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2014, 10:12 AM
 
Location: Bel Air, California
23,766 posts, read 29,058,499 times
Reputation: 37337
Beatals started going downhill after Sutcliffe ditched the band

it's common knowledge that McCartney's clumsy base playing and amateurish croaking caused Sutcliffe to suffer excruciating migraines and eventually kill himself.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2014, 10:15 AM
 
Location: Encino, CA
4,565 posts, read 5,419,304 times
Reputation: 8249
The greatest by best selling? Or the greatest by our individual tastes? Or the greatest according to critical acclaim?

As far as greatest SELLING the top 5 are:

#1: Michael Jackson: Thriller (1982) 65 million
#2: AC/DC: Back in Black (1980) 50 million
#3: Pink Floyd: The Dark Side of the Moon (1973) 50 million
#4: Whitney Houston: The Bodyguard (1992) 45 million
#5: Michael Jackson: Bad (1987) 45 million


My own personal "Greatest" albums are (in no particular order):

Stevie Ray Vaughn - Live Alive
Soundgarden - Superunknown
Stone Temple Pilots - Core
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2014, 10:18 AM
 
Location: San Diego
5,319 posts, read 8,985,244 times
Reputation: 3396
Quote:
Originally Posted by jay5835 View Post
You probably prefer McDonald's and chain restaurants, too.
Since you are taking this thread off topic ...

I don't eat fast food. I only eat healthy food, and almost always prepare my own meals. Look up my many posts in the Exercise and Fitness forum.

Now please try to stay on topic.

The reason Forever Changes only peaked at 154 on Billboards Top 200, was because it is NOT very good.

When music is good ... people buy it.

Forever Changes seriously lacks in melody.

The vocals are mediocre at best.

The songs are completely forgettable. Absolutely nothing interesting about them.

The only thing I found worth listening to on the 5 tracks I heard was the drums.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2014, 11:18 AM
 
Location: Philaburbia
41,958 posts, read 75,192,887 times
Reputation: 66918
Quote:
Originally Posted by RD5050 View Post
The songs are completely forgettable. Absolutely nothing interesting about them.
Every band that was influenced by the sounds on that album - from the Grass Roots and Led Zeppelin to heaven knows how many U.S. and UK bands in the 1980s - would disagree with you.

Either way, you'll find Forever Changes on numerous "best album" lists - I doubt you'll find The Beatles 1962-66 on any "best ever" lists, unless it's a "best greatest album hits" list.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2014, 11:45 AM
 
Location: San Diego
5,319 posts, read 8,985,244 times
Reputation: 3396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohiogirl81 View Post
Every band that was influenced by the sounds on that album - from the Grass Roots and Led Zeppelin to heaven knows how many U.S. and UK bands in the 1980s - would disagree with you.

Either way, you'll find Forever Changes on numerous "best album" lists - I doubt you'll find The Beatles 1962-66 on any "best ever" lists, unless it's a "best greatest album hits" list.
You should read more carefully ...

Arthur Lee (musician) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Quote:
Lee said when he first heard The Byrds he felt vindicated since he'd already been writing music that had a similar folk rock sound. In 1965 the Grass Roots, his folk rock unit, changed their name to Love because there was already a signed act called The Grass Roots.
Except for the fact the Beatles 1962 - 1966 reached at or near the top of many of the world's music charts when it was released in 1973:

Wikipedia - Beatles 1962 -1966 Red Album


Last edited by RD5050; 05-29-2014 at 12:06 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2014, 12:34 PM
 
Location: North Oakland
9,150 posts, read 10,894,540 times
Reputation: 14503
As if I'm going to accept the "if it sells more, it has to be better" logic of a self-described classic rock fan who never got around to listening to Forever Changes until 2014. You just keep playing your DSOTM and Beatles Greatest Hits albums, RD.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Entertainment and Arts > Music

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:09 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top