|

08-21-2009, 12:30 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Houston
126 posts, read 80,399 times
Reputation: 99
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MantaRay
That thesis is highly flawed. Taking the economically deteriorating Detroit and attempting to cast a wide net across all blue states is the height of fallacy. San Francisco is in the middle of a very blue state, and it has a strong economy, is beautifully developed, and is highly popular nationally and internationally. People talk all the time about wanting to live in Chicago and the city has a wealth of amenities as well as the best waterfront in the nation, and it is in a solidly blue state. People marvel over the architecture of Boston and over how green and beautiful Seattle is, both of those being in solidly blue states. Portland, OR is a mecca for bike culture and for smart growth, and hordes of people view the city VERY favorably, and it's in a blue state. Being a blue state is a TERRIBLE and whimsical reason to leave the cities of that state. Economic erosion is a much better reason, and would be the primary reason for the city you DO cite.
The statement you made is in the same mold as somebody saying the United States is a dirty and overcrowded place, just ask anyone from NYC. Or like saying red states are nothing but small hick cities and rural hick towns, just ask Mississippi.
Whether a state is blue or red is one of the most absurd reasons I have ever heard for deciding to move or not to move to a city in that state.
|
Funny how I just met Joanna, who moved here 2 weeks ago from Vancouver WA, part of the Portland Metro area. She left to escape the Portland area's 15% (its what she said!) unemployment rate for Houston's which is half that. All of the places you mention in your post are on the coasts, except Chicago and are exceptionally beautiful and/or packed with history, e.g. Boston, NYC. Somehow it is the unfortunate aspect of human nature that such places which are magnets for the intelligentsia take on this "let it slide" attitude which infects their beliefs regarding personal responsibility and of course makes its way into politics-- plus a large segment of the intelligentsia are European socialist wannabes. Now that we are in a bad recession, many of those people are fleeing for Texas and other red states. Please --check the net migration rates for the following: NY, MA, CA, OR, IL, MI, OH. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm fairly certain more people are leaving all those states than arriving, and in at least 3, (MA, MI, OH) the population is shrinking. And the area you cite which is not coastal, Chicagoland, maybe you would like to live with a state income tax, a $12,000 property tax bill on a suburban 2000 sq ft house in order to fund the most screwed political system in the country.
You know -- you're right. These people would never admit that they are moving to a red state on principle and would say that is a ridiculous reason for doing so just as you say. But now what they care about most is practicality, and where the rubber meets the road the key phrase is economic survival, and currently, the pro-business states are their best bet. Practicality and the real world win the argument every time.
Last edited by groovamos; 08-21-2009 at 01:16 PM..
|
|

08-21-2009, 01:08 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Madison
381 posts, read 261,831 times
Reputation: 130
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by groovamos
Funny how I just met Joanna, who moved here 2 weeks ago from Vancouver WA, part of the Portland Metro area. She left to escape the Portland area's 15% (its what she said!) unemployment rate for Houston's which is half that. All of the places you mention in your post are on the coasts, except Chicago and are exceptionally beautiful and/or packed with history, e.g. Boston, NYC. Somehow it is the unfortunate aspect of human nature that such places which are magnets for the intelligentsia take on this "let it slide" attitude which infects their beliefs regarding personal responsibility and of course makes its way into politics-- plus a large segment of the intelligentsia are European socialist wannabes. Now that we are in a bad recession, many of those people are fleeing for Texas and other red states. Please --check the net migration rates for the following: NY, MA, CA, OR, IL, MI, OH. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm fairly certain more people are leaving all those states than arriving, and in at least 3, (MA, MI, OH) the population is shrinking. And the area you cite which is not coastal, Chicago, maybe you would like to live with a $12,000 property tax bill on a suburban 2000 sq ft house and have the most screwed political system in the country.
You know -- you're right. These people would never admit that they are moving to a red state on principle and would say that is a ridiculous reason for doing so just as you say. But now what they care about most is practicality, and where the rubber meets the road the key phrase is economic survival, and currently, the pro-business states are their best bet. Practicality and the real world win the argument every time.
|
"The economic issues that are likely to be central in the 2010 elections illustrate the inadequacy of the red-blue concept. Consider unemployment rates. The latest (June 2009) unemployment rate for the nation was 9.5 percent. In red states, it was 8.1 percent and in blue states it was a not-so-different 9.2 percent, hardly divergent enough to suggest that we’re talking about two different worlds. The purple states are somewhere in the middle, as we might expect, at 8.8 percent."
TheHill.com - Economy undermines red-blue view
An interesting article from a Republican pollster.
|
|

08-21-2009, 02:14 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Tennessee
1,008 posts, read 535,832 times
Reputation: 366
|
|
|
mad fiddler, I can't rep you again but rep rep rep!
|
|

08-21-2009, 02:42 PM
|
|
ABO (Anyone But Obama) in 2012
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Hendersonville, Tenn.
1,129 posts, read 1,044,419 times
Reputation: 455
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MantaRay
San Francisco is in the middle of a very blue state, and it has a strong economy, is beautifully developed, and is highly popular nationally and internationally.
|
According to City-Data, the mean household income in SF is just over $60,000 while the mean home price is over $800,000. Not somewhere I want to live if I'm trying to be smart with my money.
The unemployment rate there is 10%, which is better than most Left Coast cities but higher than most large cities in low-tax and tax-free "red" states.
|
|

08-21-2009, 04:36 PM
|
|
Not a member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
163 posts, read 62,415 times
Reputation: 65
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by groovamos
Funny how I just met Joanna, who moved here 2 weeks ago from Vancouver WA, part of the Portland Metro area. She left to escape the Portland area's 15% (its what she said!) unemployment rate for Houston's which is half that. All of the places you mention in your post are on the coasts, except Chicago and are exceptionally beautiful and/or packed with history, e.g. Boston, NYC. Somehow it is the unfortunate aspect of human nature that such places which are magnets for the intelligentsia take on this "let it slide" attitude which infects their beliefs regarding personal responsibility and of course makes its way into politics-- plus a large segment of the intelligentsia are European socialist wannabes. Now that we are in a bad recession, many of those people are fleeing for Texas and other red states. Please --check the net migration rates for the following: NY, MA, CA, OR, IL, MI, OH. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm fairly certain more people are leaving all those states than arriving, and in at least 3, (MA, MI, OH) the population is shrinking. And the area you cite which is not coastal, Chicagoland, maybe you would like to live with a state income tax, a $12,000 property tax bill on a suburban 2000 sq ft house in order to fund the most screwed political system in the country.
You know -- you're right. These people would never admit that they are moving to a red state on principle and would say that is a ridiculous reason for doing so just as you say. But now what they care about most is practicality, and where the rubber meets the road the key phrase is economic survival, and currently, the pro-business states are their best bet. Practicality and the real world win the argument every time.
|
Nicely stated. Thank you. The liberals approach to high government regulations, high taxes, out of control spending and their resistance to cut entitlements, taxes and services has resulted in many small business owners(like myself), leaving our state in droves. Like Groovamos pointed out, the net migration rate is a fact! I'm merely stating that I hope when liberals migrate to other parts of this great country, I hope they leave their Kool-Aid behind. Please stop destroying our country. Liberalism(Just another word for Socialism) doesn't work.
Last edited by fumanchu41; 08-21-2009 at 04:51 PM..
|
|

08-21-2009, 09:39 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Franklin
2,752 posts, read 2,231,938 times
Reputation: 975
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fumanchu41
I'm merely stating that I hope when liberals migrate to other parts of this great country, I hope they leave their Kool-Aid behind. Please stop destroying our country. Liberalism(Just another word for Socialism) doesn't work.
|
Okay, I'm done. I don't understand your need to name-call and insult, but I hope you're happy with your move.
|
|

08-21-2009, 09:51 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Middle Tennessee
1,316 posts, read 396,386 times
Reputation: 719
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fumanchu41
I'm merely stating that I hope when liberals migrate to other parts of this great country, I hope they leave their Kool-Aid behind. Please stop destroying our country. Liberalism(Just another word for Socialism) doesn't work.
|
This is one reason I want to leave Tennessee. And for the record, the unemployment rate here in solidly red Murfreesboro was 12.6% in May, according to City Data.
|
|

08-21-2009, 11:12 PM
|
|
Not a member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
163 posts, read 62,415 times
Reputation: 65
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lamplight
This is one reason I want to leave Tennessee. And for the record, the unemployment rate here in solidly red Murfreesboro was 12.6% in May, according to City Data.
|
That statement can be interpreted either way. May I ask for clarification on your reason for wanting to leave Tennessee?
|
|

08-21-2009, 11:13 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Tennessee
1,008 posts, read 535,832 times
Reputation: 366
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pimpy
According to City-Data, the mean household income in SF is just over $60,000 while the mean home price is over $800,000. Not somewhere I want to live if I'm trying to be smart with my money.
The unemployment rate there is 10%, which is better than most Left Coast cities but higher than most large cities in low-tax and tax-free "red" states.
|
did it say what the median income is? Just curious and too tired to look it up.
|
|

08-21-2009, 11:15 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Tennessee
1,008 posts, read 535,832 times
Reputation: 366
|
|
|
A city that celebrates creativity and artistic talent as much as Nashville is going to have people from all walks of life. Most coexist peacefully and respectfully. If that disturbs you, are you sure you've found the right city?
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|