U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Nature
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-17-2016, 07:44 AM
 
Location: San Diego
35,190 posts, read 32,168,385 times
Reputation: 19743

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by OpanaPointer View Post
Can we keep the politics in the political sections?
What? It can't be more political.


Lobbying Spending Database - Defenders of Wildlife, 2016 | OpenSecrets
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-17-2016, 10:22 AM
 
Location: Duluth, MN
521 posts, read 965,669 times
Reputation: 846
Quote:
Originally Posted by WyoNewk View Post
This was noted in the link initially provided by the OP. The current President, whoever he/she happens to be right now, OK'd the increased bald eagle kill. If the current President and his/her administration arbitrarily quadruple the amount of eagles that can be killed without penalty, it most certainly IS a reflection of the current President.

And while on the subject, I think it sucks. I won't say more, as much as I'd like to, since this isn't the right place for it.

That sighting/killing of a Wolverine in North Dakota is surprising... and sad.
Despite any proposed increase in the number of birds that can be killed via depredation, at least now there are procedures in place for wind facilities to mitigate those kills. This includes working with the Fish & Wildlife Service to determine where the turbines are placed or which direction(s) they face (most can be moved or "aimed" in different directions to avoid traditional migration routes), etc. In the past there were no such procedures. The rules in place, today - such as the requirement to file an eagle conservation plan - still offset the increased number of birds killed. And again, these rules are not a reflection of the current administration, as development of them began as long ago as the late 80's.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Nature
Similar Threads
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top