Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Nebraska
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-09-2008, 08:02 AM
 
Location: Papillion
2,589 posts, read 10,555,537 times
Reputation: 916

Advertisements

Interesting article in today's Omaha World Hearld regarding economic development statistics in Nebraska. They did an urban vs rural analysis and rural (less than 2,500 people by their definition) did better in most cases.

Here is a part of the article with some of the comparitive stats - as they say its counterintuitive to most discussions.

Quote:
• Median household income in urban Nebraskadid not keep pace with inflation, declining by 7.7 percent. In contrast, incomes increased by 5.3 percent in rural areas

So spending power in rural Nebraska now exceeds that in urban areas by more than $1,000 per household, $47,793 versus $46,601. That's a reversal from the 2000 Census, when urban exceeded rural by more than $5,000.

• Real median home values went up nearly $21,000 in rural areas, double the increase seen in urban parts of the state.

The median home value remained higher in urban Nebraska: $123,700 compared with $101,100. But by percent change, growth was three times higher in rural than urban areas.

• Poverty rates diverged since the 2000 Census, when they were nearly identical in urban and rural Nebraska. While the rural poverty rate dropped less than a percentage point to 8.7 percent, the urban poverty rate increased by about 2.5 percentage points to more than 12 percent.

• The rate of homeownership gain in rural areas was twice that of urban parts. Nearly 80 percent of nonvacant rural Nebraska homes were owner-occupied during 2005-2007, compared with less than 65 percent in urban.

• Saunders and Cass Counties — both part of the Omaha metropolitan area but both considered largely rural— had the most favorable economic changes since 2000 of the 16 counties with new data released, Drozd said. He said they had median household incomes that rose faster than inflation since 2000.

• Education gains were greater among rural residents, too. In 2000, urban and rural residents age 25 and older had nearly identical high school graduation rates. Rural residents since have advanced by 4 percentage points, compared to the 2-percentage point gain among urbanites.
SOURCE: http://www.omaha.com/index.php?u_page=2798&u_sid=10509262
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Nebraska
Similar Threads
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:45 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top