Well,
I think 5 years ago one could reasonably disagree with "global climate change" as a fact.
Unfortunately, after all i have read in the past few years, as well as personal observations I think only a fool, or someone that doesn't have any exposure to national media and the internet could continue to reach that conclusion.
It seems the only unanswered question is how much is man made, and how much, just natural earth cycle.
I should preface the previous statement. I was born/raised in NH.
I am not some "liberal nut job' as some seem to suggest that anyone that cares about the future of the planet and our species must be. (I have always voted either Republican or libertarian in every election).
I also have not seen the Al Gore movie on climate change. I do however take exception to most that find it convent (no pun intended) paint everyone that cares about the environment as a blind follower of his message.
There even seems to be an acceptance of Global climate change as fact by the people most resistant to believing it. Our current president even has changed his tune, and now "admits" it is a real cause for concern, as well as a good lot of clergy and priests that are calling on their congregations to help stop its spread. As well as several Large oil companies.
To those that seem to still have a problem accepting Global climate change as fact (as laid out be 90% of scientists worldwide, give or take a few) What am i missing?
I have read 80-100 articles that confirm global climate as fact. Please rather than just flaming what i say because you don't agree with it (just makes you look ignorant). Provide the links to the articles you are reading that lead you to a different conclusion. And the links to the web sites of the scientists that still are disagreeing with most of their colleagues.
I have had, and still have an open mind. Convince me my conclusions are incorrect!!!
I'll just throw a few things out there that strike home to me:
Changing seasons
"Since the 1970's average winter temperatures have risen more than 4 degrees Fahrenheit in the Northeast region."
from
Global Warming Impact Zones | U.S. New England
My father that has lived in NH about all his 68 years on the earth commented to me this past holiday on this very issue.
I also just finished rereading the IPCC report
IPCC - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
If you disagree or have read scientists that do, please provide links to factual articles that discredit it.
I was also fortunate to spend several days diving on the Great Barrier Reef in 1992. It saddens my to say it had already been negatively affectively by Ocean Acidification.
See:
Acidic Oceans Threat To Great Barrier Reef And Australia's Economy | Scientific Blogging
If you disagree or have read scientists that do, please provide links to factual articles that discredit it.
To Nicolem:
I applaud you for the measures you have already taken to help preserve our environment. We all would be much better off if others followed your lead.
As for the lack of action in China and India "If Global warming is an issue, how come Al Gore and his crew do not go after China and India? They have large populations and generate how much pollution. etc.-however once again go after the US." I can only speak to the China part of that.
I went to a lecture by a well known architect a few weeks ago (Bill McDonough) He had been personally called to china by Hu Jintao to work on creating a completely new city there that would be as environmentally friendly as possible (that plans he showed us were amazing). He also mentioned that Hu Jintao made a personal apology to his people for the way his government has handled pollution in the past, and is now aggressively taking measures to help reduce its impact in the future.
