U.S. Cities  

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Hampshire
Register Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 700,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 15,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads.

Get a detailed profile
Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Closed Thread


 
Old 01-09-2008, 02:25 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
541 posts, read 567,509 times
Reputation: 244
looking4home has a spectacular aura aboutlooking4home has a spectacular aura aboutlooking4home has a spectacular aura aboutlooking4home has a spectacular aura aboutlooking4home has a spectacular aura about
It hasn't had any appreciable effect on weather, other than the occasional anomaly (drought, flood, tornadoes in January,etc.). But these things have always existed throughout human history, but perhaps not documented. People are not going to alter their lifestyles or habits unless they are forced to by law, or until something really dramatic occurs, weather-wise. And to be honest, there is a bit of fear-mongering going on, even by scientists. I don't know if it's an attempt to over-dramatize so people will pay attention and act accordingly or what. The so-called drastic changes in temperature that have the GB crowd in a tizzy, really hasn't translated into tangible effects. Supposedly, these are frightening, unprecedented temperature increases that should be causing really devastating weather and/or atmospheric changes, but where's the proof?
Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-09-2008, 09:41 AM
Jeffersonian Patriot
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Central Jersey
1,723 posts, read 807,976 times
Reputation: 286
MamaBee is a jewel in the roughMamaBee is a jewel in the roughMamaBee is a jewel in the roughMamaBee is a jewel in the roughMamaBee is a jewel in the roughMamaBee is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by looking4home View Post
It hasn't had any appreciable effect on weather, other than the occasional anomaly (drought, flood, tornadoes in January,etc.). But these things have always existed throughout human history, but perhaps not documented. People are not going to alter their lifestyles or habits unless they are forced to by law, or until something really dramatic occurs, weather-wise. And to be honest, there is a bit of fear-mongering going on, even by scientists. I don't know if it's an attempt to over-dramatize so people will pay attention and act accordingly or what. The so-called drastic changes in temperature that have the GB crowd in a tizzy, really hasn't translated into tangible effects. Supposedly, these are frightening, unprecedented temperature increases that should be causing really devastating weather and/or atmospheric changes, but where's the proof?
The fear-mongering attempt (which seems to be working because elementary school children are frightened that the world will end) is being used so the government can push laws that will restrict the rights of citizens...whether it's global warming, drugs, terrorism, etc. if you're afraid you'll voluntarily hand over your rights cheering all the way.

Who is benefiting from the hype? Countries that can sell their "carbon credits" and other countries that can use environmental regulations to stifle a competing country's economy, companies now cashing in on everything "green", and people like Al Gore that fly around in jets making $$ for speaking events.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2008, 10:49 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
211 posts, read 219,260 times
Reputation: 84
airedaly will become famous soon enoughairedaly will become famous soon enough
Fear mongering by scientists? Please remember that scientists are citizens and parents, too. They know that global climate change will change their children's futures. Should they keep their findings to themselves?

School children should be learning about recycling and using fewer natural resources. Their environmental education can then proceed into more details of climate change thru elementary school. It's their future we're talking about. Nobody wants to frighten kids, but they are aware that we won't be able to count on the stable climate we're used to.

The beneficiaries of all global warming efforts today will be our children and grandchildren and their children.

Native Americans had it right; they always planned ahead seven generations. Society today barely plans for next week.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2008, 11:09 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Finger Lakes, NY
223 posts, read 191,697 times
Reputation: 193
SkiChick has a spectacular aura aboutSkiChick has a spectacular aura aboutSkiChick has a spectacular aura aboutSkiChick has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by airedaly View Post
School children should be learning about recycling and using fewer natural resources. Their environmental education can then proceed into more details of climate change thru elementary school. It's their future we're talking about. Nobody wants to frighten kids, but they are aware that we won't be able to count on the stable climate we're used to.
I find my daughter's school district very ironic in how they educate the kids about recycling. Every classroom has those well known blue recycling boxes for paper products. The children go around and collect the blue boxes and feel good about what they think they are doing is good for the Earth. The ironic part is all the paper from the blue boxes gets incinerated by the school district! So they learn all this fantastic stuff about recycling, and then the school does this?!?
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2008, 11:26 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
211 posts, read 219,260 times
Reputation: 84
airedaly will become famous soon enoughairedaly will become famous soon enough
That's very sad. The town should be ashamed. How about a letter to the editor? Somebody in the town is not doing their job.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2008, 11:31 AM
Not a member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
625 posts, read 671,612 times
Reputation: 393
OCCASparky is just really niceOCCASparky is just really niceOCCASparky is just really niceOCCASparky is just really niceOCCASparky is just really niceOCCASparky is just really niceOCCASparky is just really niceOCCASparky is just really nice
Quote:
Originally Posted by airedaly View Post
Fear mongering by scientists? Please remember that scientists are citizens and parents, too. They know that global climate change will change their children's futures. Should they keep their findings to themselves?
If their "findings" dovetail with what their benefactors are paying for, then yes, a questioning attitude is in order.

Follow the money, airedaly--follow the money.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2008, 12:09 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
211 posts, read 219,260 times
Reputation: 84
airedaly will become famous soon enoughairedaly will become famous soon enough
Climate scientists at US universities are generally funded by the Fed. Government. Are you suggesting that their findings correlate with the government's position on global climate change? I am not sure what you are suggesting.

On the other hand, the CEI's scientists receive much of their funding from the fossil fuel in industry. Makes you wonder, doesn't it?
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2008, 08:10 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
541 posts, read 567,509 times
Reputation: 244
looking4home has a spectacular aura aboutlooking4home has a spectacular aura aboutlooking4home has a spectacular aura aboutlooking4home has a spectacular aura aboutlooking4home has a spectacular aura about
Not true, airedaly! US universities receive some federal funding, but a lot of it comes from the states themselves. Unless your college is private, in which case it comes from private donations, grants,etc. Each state has its own bias when it comes to these socio-political issues, so a university in a state like CA, where I live, will get more and better funding for its scientists working on such projects than maybe a more conservative state would.

My daughter is also a scientist, or was until she couldn't handle it anymore. I know all too well where scientists get the funding for their projects, and how they go about getting it. It's not too pretty, and there's nothing very academic or high-minded about it, either. It's very cutthroat and political, on every level.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2008, 09:33 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
211 posts, read 219,260 times
Reputation: 84
airedaly will become famous soon enoughairedaly will become famous soon enough
For the type of research I'm familiar with, it's mostly federal dollars. The majority of climate change study in the US is done at very large universities and at federal research facilities (NASA, NREL etc.). Very few private dollars going there.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2008, 10:05 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Moving
1,126 posts, read 674,141 times
Reputation: 1147
CometVoyager has much to be proud ofCometVoyager has much to be proud ofCometVoyager has much to be proud ofCometVoyager has much to be proud ofCometVoyager has much to be proud ofCometVoyager has much to be proud ofCometVoyager has much to be proud ofCometVoyager has much to be proud ofCometVoyager has much to be proud ofCometVoyager has much to be proud ofCometVoyager has much to be proud ofCometVoyager has much to be proud ofCometVoyager has much to be proud ofCometVoyager has much to be proud ofCometVoyager has much to be proud ofCometVoyager has much to be proud ofCometVoyager has much to be proud ofCometVoyager has much to be proud of
Smile How Did Native Americans Plan Ahead for Senven Generations?

Hi Airedaly!

Was just wondering if you could shed some light upon your comment regarding how Native Americans had Planned ahead for Seven generations?? Would appreciate learning about the science and techniques Native Americans used to protect their environment and ward off disease and infestations as well.

Thanks


Quote:
Originally Posted by airedaly View Post
Fear mongering by scientists? Please remember that scientists are citizens and parents, too. They know that global climate change will change their children's futures. Should they keep their findings to themselves?

School children should be learning about recycling and using fewer natural resources. Their environmental education can then proceed into more details of climate change thru elementary school. It's their future we're talking about. Nobody wants to frighten kids, but they are aware that we won't be able to count on the stable climate we're used to.

The beneficiaries of all global warming efforts today will be our children and grandchildren and their children.

Native Americans had it right; they always planned ahead seven generations. Society today barely plans for next week.
Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



Closed Thread


Quick Reply
Message:

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads


Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Hampshire

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:26 AM.

Copyright © 2005-2009, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 - Top