Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-25-2010, 12:36 PM
 
327 posts, read 881,564 times
Reputation: 136

Advertisements

numbers seem to scare you as they refute any of your vague and general postings..

you said private workers make more..

i showed you 2 separate studies sourced from the Bureau of Labor and Bureau of Economics showing otherwise.

what studies do you base this on?

it's a simple question you keep dodging with further smoke and mirrors.

again, to clarify what studies do you base your notion that private workers make more?

simple question.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-25-2010, 12:38 PM
 
631 posts, read 719,827 times
Reputation: 162
Quote:
Originally Posted by newjitty View Post

Some of these teachers are way below 30 years experience - a quick scan in Union City gave me:

Ca****, Regina $112,878 - 10 years
Ramos, Rebecca
$114,278 - 7 years
Bennetti, John $111,813 - 16 years
Perez, Geraldin $108,706 - 17 years

FYI,

You list has:

A: No teachers
B: One person with a Doctorate
C: A special Ed specialist
D: 2 administrators
E: 3 with masters degrees.



NJ Teacher Details
RAMOS, REBECCA
School Psychologist
Degree: Doctorate


NJ Teacher Details
BENNETTI, JOHN
Degree Masters
Assistant Principal Elementary School


NJ Teacher Details
PEREZ, GERALDIN
Degree Masters
Middle School Principal


NJ Teacher Details
CA****, REGINA
Degree Masters
Learning Disabilities Teacher Consultant
School DISTRICT OFFICE
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-25-2010, 12:39 PM
 
631 posts, read 719,827 times
Reputation: 162
Quote:
Originally Posted by newjitty View Post
numbers seem to scare you as they refute any of your vague and general postings..

you said private workers make more..

i showed you 2 separate studies sourced from the Bureau of Labor and Bureau of Economics showing otherwise.

what studies do you base this on?

it's a simple question you keep dodging with further smoke and mirrors.

again, to clarify what studies do you base your notion that private workers make more?

simple question.
I guess you missed it again when I said STATE workers right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-25-2010, 12:41 PM
 
327 posts, read 881,564 times
Reputation: 136
Local and State workers were included in the study

where were your sources?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-25-2010, 12:43 PM
 
631 posts, read 719,827 times
Reputation: 162
Quote:
Originally Posted by newjitty View Post
Local and State workers were included in the study

where were your sources?

Your link:

State and local. State government employees had an average salary of $47,231 in 2008, about 5% less than comparable jobs in the private sector.


Federal pay ahead of private industry - USATODAY.com (http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2010-03-04-federal-pay_N.htm - broken link)

Also I understand that with benefits this can go in favor of the public sector. I see that as a trade off, more money in you pocket, for less health benefits or days off.

Are we done here yet? maybe get back on topic since we hijacked this entire thread

Last edited by mikeym81; 08-25-2010 at 12:48 PM.. Reason: adding text.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-25-2010, 12:47 PM
 
327 posts, read 881,564 times
Reputation: 136
i like how you bypass the accompanying newer link (dated August) showing state and local employees making more than private counterparts

Federal workers earning double their private counterparts - USATODAY.com

why do you keep jumping from one form of Public Employee to another in hopes of skirting a simple question?

where were your sources showing private workers make more?

simple enough
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-25-2010, 12:53 PM
 
631 posts, read 719,827 times
Reputation: 162
Quote:
Originally Posted by newjitty View Post
i like how you bypass the accompanying newer link (dated August) showing state and local employees making more than private counterparts

Federal workers earning double their private counterparts - USATODAY.com

why do you keep jumping from one form of Public Employee to another in hopes of skirting a simple question?

where were your sources showing private workers make more?

simple enough

I used the link you posted for my fact. Why did you post it if it was no good?

You new link has no mention of state level workers. Only federal, and I never argued those.

Since you are going on about skirting issues, I suppose you are going to ignore my teachers post above
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-25-2010, 12:57 PM
 
327 posts, read 881,564 times
Reputation: 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeym81 View Post
You new link has no mention of state level workers. Only federal, and I never argued those.


so just blatantly lie when the link I posted even has a huge graphic showing state and local employees?







Federal workers earning double their private counterparts - USATODAY.com

why do you continue to skirt the simple question?

i've given you sources from nj.gov, Bureau of Labor, and Bureau of Economics

where is your ONE source showing private workers make more as you claim?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-25-2010, 01:00 PM
 
Location: West Orange, NJ
12,546 posts, read 21,395,557 times
Reputation: 3730
can you two just go make out in the corner already?!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-25-2010, 01:09 PM
 
631 posts, read 719,827 times
Reputation: 162
Quote:
Originally Posted by newjitty View Post
so just blatantly lie when the link I posted even has a huge graphic showing state and local employees?







Federal workers earning double their private counterparts - USATODAY.com

why do you continue to skirt the simple question?

i've given you sources from nj.gov, Bureau of Labor, and Bureau of Economics

where is your ONE source showing private workers make more as you claim?

Here's my one source, same as yours

Federal pay ahead of private industry - USATODAY.com (http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2010-03-04-federal-pay_N.htm - broken link)


Your graph is misleading. You again you miss words.

You graph is "Average compensation in 2009"

MY statement is:

State and local. State government employees had an average salary of $47,231 in 2008, about 5% less than comparable jobs in the private sector.

Again, look at the difference. Not to mention due to the economic climate, your bound to see the overall private salaries drop since public works usually still get raises during these times.

Can you stop "skirting" that teacher issue? since you accuse me of doing it Or better yet both of us stop hijacking this tread.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:36 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top