Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-22-2011, 03:53 PM
 
Location: Cumberland County, NJ
8,632 posts, read 12,989,467 times
Reputation: 5766

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nexis4Jersey View Post
That would stop the sprawl....
How would that stop the sprawl?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-22-2011, 03:58 PM
 
Location: On the Rails in Northern NJ
12,380 posts, read 26,840,807 times
Reputation: 4581
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwillyfromphilly View Post
How would that stop the sprawl?
Rail Encourages Dense Development , so in a way it soaks up the sprawl.... You'll still have sprawl but it won't go out for miles and miles...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2011, 04:02 PM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 38,885,293 times
Reputation: 7976
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nexis4Jersey View Post
Rail Encourages Dense Development , so in a way it soaks up the sprawl.... You'll still have sprawl but it won't go out for miles and miles...

So long as the rail actually links with the job centers, highly unlikly based on the current development pattern. It is a very complex issue, look at Patco, only 40K daily ridership, among a working population of 400K
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2011, 04:10 PM
 
Location: On the Rails in Northern NJ
12,380 posts, read 26,840,807 times
Reputation: 4581
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidphilly View Post
So long as the rail actually links with the job centers, highly unlikly based on the current development pattern. It is a very complex issue, look at Patco, only 40K daily ridership, among a working population of 400K
The PATCO , nor any of the southern Jersey towns haven't taken full or any advantage of TOD....around the stations. Same with Septa , only Northern Jersey , NY and Westchester have full fledged TOD along there lines..... The Riverline towns have improved on this with TOD around there stations , and ridership is growing.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2011, 04:35 PM
 
6,321 posts, read 10,333,924 times
Reputation: 3835
The title of the article is true for the most part but it's kinda ironic that the county with the biggest decrease was Cape May...doesn't get any more coastal and southern than that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2011, 08:41 PM
 
Location: NJ
12,283 posts, read 35,675,525 times
Reputation: 5331
the title is misleading, there are northern counties which grew just as much if not more than southern and coastal counties. see: somerset county -vs- burlington, sussex county -vs- salem for instance.

i don't get the conclusion drawn by this article.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2011, 09:01 PM
 
Location: Jersey City
7,055 posts, read 19,296,053 times
Reputation: 6917
I agree, tahiti. Maybe we're using a Bergen County resident's definition of "South Jersey," which includes everything south of the IZOD center.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2011, 09:03 PM
 
Location: On the Rails in Northern NJ
12,380 posts, read 26,840,807 times
Reputation: 4581
Quote:
Originally Posted by lammius View Post
I agree, tahiti. Maybe we're using a Bergen County resident's definition of "South Jersey," which includes everything south of the IZOD center.
LMAO....anything south of I287 / Raritan Valley line is South Jerzey...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2011, 06:05 AM
 
6,321 posts, read 10,333,924 times
Reputation: 3835
Well it seems like the main conclusion they drew was that the counties with the two biggest growths by far (Gloucester and Ocean) are southern, and coastal, respectively (as Gloucester is not coastal and many would argue that Ocean is not Southern). Atlantic County (both southern and coastal) was tied for the third-largest growth.

But it is somewhat misleading since these counties grew the most because there's the most room to grow there. Not much more room to grow in Bergen County...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2011, 06:50 AM
 
Location: West Orange, NJ
12,546 posts, read 21,394,519 times
Reputation: 3730
Quote:
Originally Posted by tahiti View Post
the title is misleading, there are northern counties which grew just as much if not more than southern and coastal counties. see: somerset county -vs- burlington, sussex county -vs- salem for instance.

i don't get the conclusion drawn by this article.
that's kinda what i thought too. north growth has certainly gotten slower, south is growing, but it's not like people are fleeing the north part of the state.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:



Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:37 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top