Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-05-2010, 09:28 PM
 
1,446 posts, read 4,596,039 times
Reputation: 991

Advertisements

Did anyone read the article about the new 44-story skyscraper that will be going up in Newark? The URl is...N.J. Performing Arts Center gets $38M tax credit for high-rise in Newark | - NJ.com

Anyway, it will become the tallest building in the city and will be built right across from the NJPAC. Costing 200 million to build it will be primarily apartments and condos with retail shops on the bottom floors. Both Booker and Christie are supporting the proposal. Construction should begin in 12 to 18 months.

So what do you think about this construction project in the Brick City? Will it finally stimulate the gentrification of Newark or will it be another project that goes nowhere? Discuss.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-05-2010, 09:31 PM
 
Location: On the Rails in Northern NJ
12,380 posts, read 26,842,423 times
Reputation: 4581
To catch up with Jersey City , we need to encourage more of these. At least 15-20 more of these. Build them in Abandoned lots and on top of parking areas like JC did.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2010, 09:57 PM
 
Location: New Jersey
2,653 posts, read 5,958,530 times
Reputation: 2331
Great news for NWK. This along with the "Teachers Village" restoration on Halsey St, the tower Shaq will build (much smaller than this project), the river front walk, Richarson Lofts & the NJIT gateway project, Newark is slowly, slowly, slowly coming along.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2010, 10:14 PM
 
4,285 posts, read 10,762,440 times
Reputation: 3810
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nexis4Jersey View Post
To catch up with Jersey City , we need to encourage more of these. At least 15-20 more of these. Build them in Abandoned lots and on top of parking areas like JC did.
I think that NJ should pick either JC or Newark to revitalize. And I think JC would be the smart choice. There is a limited amount of funds, and I think if the revitilization is done right, Jersey city could become the next hot spot near Manhattan (similar commute to Manhattan as Brooklyn).

I think the state should focus on making JC at the moment. There are already a few nice sections in the city and its smaller then Newark, with a much better commute to the city.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2010, 10:34 PM
 
Location: On the Rails in Northern NJ
12,380 posts, read 26,842,423 times
Reputation: 4581
Quote:
Originally Posted by GiantRutgersfan View Post
I think that NJ should pick either JC or Newark to revitalize. And I think JC would be the smart choice. There is a limited amount of funds, and I think if the revitilization is done right, Jersey city could become the next hot spot near Manhattan (similar commute to Manhattan as Brooklyn).

I think the state should focus on making JC at the moment. There are already a few nice sections in the city and its smaller then Newark, with a much better commute to the city.
Well JC already has its Future Sealed tightly , but Newark still needs more focus. Seeing as its at a Major Railway , Highway JCT, and has an In't Seaport / Airport then it shouldn't require that hard a push. Maybe a few years and billions of $$$ in clean ups and investments. Newark can get the materials faster and cheaper then JC because of its location.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2010, 10:41 PM
 
Location: NJ & NV
5,771 posts, read 16,578,952 times
Reputation: 2475
I'd rather see it in Newark. J City never made much sense. The terrorizers can have JC to practice blowing stuff up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2010, 11:21 PM
 
4,285 posts, read 10,762,440 times
Reputation: 3810
Quote:
Originally Posted by captne76 View Post
I'd rather see it in Newark. J City never made much sense. The terrorizers can have JC to practice blowing stuff up.
I am not even sure what this means....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2010, 12:41 AM
 
Location: NJ & NV
5,771 posts, read 16,578,952 times
Reputation: 2475
Quote:
Originally Posted by GiantRutgersfan View Post
I am not even sure what this means....
In a nutshell it means J City never made much sense to me, you can keep it, being that close to NYC is a neg in my book, you can bulldoze it and maybe start all over. But I don't live there and it's just my opinion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2010, 05:40 AM
 
431 posts, read 942,382 times
Reputation: 185
Quote:
Originally Posted by captne76 View Post
In a nutshell it means J City never made much sense to me, you can keep it, being that close to NYC is a neg in my book, you can bulldoze it and maybe start all over. But I don't live there and it's just my opinion.


Meaning its an ethnic (legal/illegal) melting pot


Newark Rising - Index


Anyway Look for the keys words in the article, this is the 4th announcement made with still no plans on how to pay for it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2010, 08:14 AM
 
9,124 posts, read 36,369,826 times
Reputation: 3631
Quote:
Originally Posted by liamnwk View Post


Anyway Look for the keys words in the article, this is the 4th announcement made with still no plans on how to pay for it.
Exactly. And seeing how there's still a glut of existing vacant space, as well as a lack of available funding, the chances of this tower being built by the dates they mention are slim to none.

The problem with Newark is that it can't command the same rents/sales prices as JC and other locales, yet the construction costs are the same- the proformas don't work. A few years back, I was involved in a cost study for a developer who was planning to build some highrises in Newark, and within 5 minutes I knew the numbers would never work. His estimated construction costs were around 30% lower than reality, and his theory was that he'd be able to get the unions to lower their wages to suit what he needed. We decided not to waste much time dealing with him, since that wasn't going to happen, and the unions laughed in his face when he approached them with the idea.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:18 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top