Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-21-2012, 08:19 PM
 
1,450 posts, read 3,452,645 times
Reputation: 735

Advertisements

Just came across this info that the US Weather Service has issued yet another flood watch for our area. Flood watch in effect in New Jersey | Daily Record | dailyrecord.com This is becoming an all too familiar situation. (especially to those living in the affected areas)

What should be done to correct the situation? Should the government buy the homes in these frequently flooded areas? Are there ways to improve drainage? Do we need more retention ponds, levees, should we build canals? Tell us your thoughts and ideas of how this should be addressed and of any possible solutions.

KoalaNJ
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-21-2012, 08:20 PM
 
Location: Bergen County, NJ
1,602 posts, read 4,158,204 times
Reputation: 1851
I saw. I just checked for Bergen County - heavy rain and winds all day tomorrow, into the night.

7-Day Forecast for Latitude 40.91°N and Longitude 73.94°W
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2012, 09:33 PM
 
10,222 posts, read 19,201,005 times
Reputation: 10894
Quote:
Originally Posted by KoalaNJ View Post
What should be done to correct the situation? Should the government buy the homes in these frequently flooded areas? Are there ways to improve drainage? Do we need more retention ponds, levees, should we build canals? Tell us your thoughts and ideas of how this should be addressed and of any possible solutions.

KoalaNJ
It's not really practical to prevent flooding statewide, and trying tends to result in unpleasant side effects on the ecology.

No, the government shouldn't buy homes in frequently flooded areas. Instead, the national flood insurance program should be discontinued and flood insurance should be allowed to rise to market rates. Why should we all pay for people who live in frequently flooded areas? It's not like it's some sort of hidden danger or surprise.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2012, 09:50 PM
 
11,337 posts, read 11,033,394 times
Reputation: 14993
Quote:
Originally Posted by nybbler View Post
It's not really practical to prevent flooding statewide, and trying tends to result in unpleasant side effects on the ecology.

No, the government shouldn't buy homes in frequently flooded areas. Instead, the national flood insurance program should be discontinued and flood insurance should be allowed to rise to market rates. Why should we all pay for people who live in frequently flooded areas? It's not like it's some sort of hidden danger or surprise.
The flood watch specifically states that the main stem rivers are unlikely to flood from the anticipated 2-3.5 inches of rain from this event. So we are not going to have a repeat of recent floods.

However, big picture, I agree: phase out government subsidized flood insurance over 20 years. Let the market dertermine the premiums. If they get high enough, which is likely, properties within the very bad flood zones will diminish in value to the point of being worthless (which they are if flooding occurs every 3-4 years). They can be returned to vacant parkland at that point, which is a rational use given the constant flooding.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-22-2012, 08:02 AM
PDD
 
Location: The Sand Hills of NC
8,773 posts, read 18,379,327 times
Reputation: 12004
Bound Brook NJ floods almost every time there is a substantial ran event.
The Native Americans that once resided in that area never put up their teepees along the Raritan River. However the "smarter than the Indians" colonists thought it was a great idea to build in the lowlands adjacent to the Raritan and that area has been flooding ever since.
The best idea would be a one time gov,t buy out and keep that low lying area as a park. It would be money better spent than trying to keep the water out and paying for flood damage for centuries to come.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-22-2012, 08:21 AM
 
Location: Sunshine N'Blue Skies
13,321 posts, read 22,656,665 times
Reputation: 11696
Quote:
Originally Posted by KoalaNJ View Post
Just came across this info that the US Weather Service has issued yet another flood watch for our area. Flood watch in effect in New Jersey | Daily Record | dailyrecord.com This is becoming an all too familiar situation. (especially to those living in the affected areas)

What should be done to correct the situation? Should the government buy the homes in these frequently flooded areas? Are there ways to improve drainage? Do we need more retention ponds, levees, should we build canals? Tell us your thoughts and ideas of how this should be addressed and of any possible solutions.

KoalaNJ
In that case they would have to buy the whole town of Denville, and a few other towns as well.
The Denville river has overflowed its banks for as long as I can remember.
Except the last time was the worst ever, most likely in its entire history.
People need to know what they are getting for the love of rivers.
There is no room for adding a wall along the river without buying out a whole street of homes. On the edge an office also.
A levee worked wonders for Kingston, Pa. Its huge and quite awesome.
Right next to it are homes that would have been lost most likely in another flood.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:17 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top