Quote:
Originally Posted by apvbguy
this is a myth promoted but the have nots to make themselves feel better when they drive up to their shack in their 10 year old beater. Sure there are people living like that but they are few and far between.
|
I must respectfully disagree. I'm by no means a "have-not." As I said previously I'm in the American middle-class and am in the NEPA upper-middle-class (the class designations change because wages in my area are abysmally low in relation to the nation). Nevertheless, I know of many of these so-called "haves" who earn less money combined than my father does alone. There are MANY cases in my area of folks who earn modest salaries yet live extravagantly. I call this a "Caviar Lifestyle on a Wal-Mart Budget." It's not some sort of class envy factor at all.
Why is this any of my business, you may ask? Well, when some of these people who are maxed out in debt in order to "look good" finally collapse financially, the economic ripple effects are absorbed by
everyone. This is no different than how those who willfully engage in destructive health habits (smoking, binge eating/drinking, etc.) cause health insurance premiums to spike even for those who DO make proper health decisions in life. Is that fair? Not at all. In similar fashion those (like my parents) who adhere to a strict monthly budget, have a financial safety cushion, etc. become externalities that are affected negatively when their own investments in the NYSE dive South due to an impending recession spawned partially by these financially irresponsible individuals leading to today's mortgage meltdown crisis. I also use the same argument for those who insist on driving Hummers, Escalades, and other very large SUVs "because it's a free country." It may be a nation of civil liberties, but you should expect those of us who drive fuel-efficient small cars to be irked at those who drive extravagantly large "pleasure" SUVs for driving OUR fuel prices up by your willful decision to consume greater quantities of a finite resource than you truly need simply because you can afford to. I'm a minimalist by nature, and it irritates me when I have to pay high costs for gasoline, health insurance, etc. due at least partially to the carelessness of others when if we as a society worked cohesively towards a common goal we could see such living expenses REDUCED.
Quote:
Originally Posted by apvbguy
different set of people, the people who are in trouble in the poconos are the poor people lured from the bronx by low payments who believed they could handle the 2 hour commute to NYC found out that the commute was killing them, their family life and one spouse either lost their jobs or are quiting to maintain their sanity
|
I seriously hope that the "Federal assistance" that President Bush and Congress have recently approved to aid those affected by the mortgage crisis does NOT benefit people like this. You need to do your homework
thoroughly before making a six-figure investment in a home. If people fooled themselves into thinking they could make payments on homes they truly could NOT afford, then we better not be using tax dollars to bail them out. We all make mistakes in life; why reward them by throwing money down the drain? I regret majoring in Accounting instead of Urban Planning. Will President Bush and Congress throw money at me for being a "victim" of a "mistake?" I think not. When you spend beyond your means you must face the consequences. I hear the whining all the time here in NEPA from people saying "We can't do the commute!!!" That's why most INTELLIGENT people do a "test run" from NEPA to their workplace during rush-hour both ways to get a good idea of what their daily commutes will be like. I don't want to bail these people out for their own lack of foresight. Why on Earth would they think a 4-hour round-trip commute would be logical when they have children to raise as well? Poor planning should NOT be "rewarded" by Congress and/or President Bush, especially not when my hard-earned tax dollars are funding it!
