Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-17-2012, 03:47 PM
 
Location: Bergen County, Nazi Jerky
367 posts, read 957,365 times
Reputation: 463

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by paperpile View Post
They hold a document stating that it was properly abandoned.


Years ago it was perfectly acceptable to have an abandoned tank pumped dry, pressure tested to ensure that there were no leaks, then filled with sand. You were then given paperwork by the licensed contractor who did the work. That changed some years back and newly abandoned tanks had to be removed instead. Older tanks that had been pumped, tested and filled were grandfathered in. It would seem that you are insisting that the owner go above and beyond what is required under the law and he is declining to do so. That leaves you with a choice to make.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-17-2012, 05:15 PM
 
Location: Cranford NJ
1,049 posts, read 4,010,178 times
Reputation: 405
Years ago, we took permits to convert to gas, which included a permit to decommission the oil tank. It was considered acceptable (and still is) to sand fill the hull. Soil sampling was not something that we wanted to pay for nor was it mandated. Currently, there is nothing saying that these tanks are grandfathered, nor required to be removed by any authority. (In this scenario, had the tank had been pulled completely, would there be any concern?) So what says that there is (or isn't) contamination on any property unless careful soil sampling is done by a quaified person? It's the buyer's buisiness to find out if there is anything on the property they are buying, that will potentially bankrupt them in the future if, say, they were to install an inground pool, and encounter contaminated soil.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top