Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-03-2017, 06:14 AM
 
2,499 posts, read 2,625,250 times
Reputation: 1789

Advertisements

If all homes drop does it really matter. You pay less for the next home plus as you move up a 20% drop on a more valuable home helps you
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-03-2017, 10:33 AM
 
532 posts, read 1,464,400 times
Reputation: 465
Quote:
Originally Posted by tom1944 View Post
If all homes drop does it really matter. You pay less for the next home plus as you move up a 20% drop on a more valuable home helps you



Curious what will happen...
In the past when the Real Estate market fell higher priced homes fell a greater or lower % than lower priced homes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2017, 06:22 PM
 
2,509 posts, read 2,494,019 times
Reputation: 4692
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnesthesiaMD View Post
I don’t think it has the impact that you think it does. NJ has a wide income gap. I don’t believe that high income people buy all the house that they can afford the way many low income people do. And nobody that is in the market for a 5000 square foot colonial is going to settle for a 2000 square foot split level just because the price of split levels went down.
You seem to have an idea that rich people (or big houses? supposedly fancy towns? not sure) just live in their own housing realm, unaffected by the rest of the market
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2017, 07:00 PM
 
Location: NJ
4,940 posts, read 12,138,851 times
Reputation: 4562
Like most things, I think people are overreacting to all this. When most people buy a home, their primary purpose of buying that home is not to obtain a tax break. They want things like good schools, a safe community, more living space, etc. I just can't imagine that say, someone from NYC that is currently renting a 500 sqft apartment, and is now married with a child, is going to continue renting because they won't get a tax break. There is still going to be a demand for good schools, more space, etc. that far outweighs the bonus of whatever tax break they may achieve buy purchasing a home. When I bought my first home, a tax break was not even considered as one of my drivers for buying instead of renting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2017, 08:13 PM
 
532 posts, read 1,464,400 times
Reputation: 465
Quote:
Originally Posted by ansky View Post
Like most things, I think people are overreacting to all this. When most people buy a home, their primary purpose of buying that home is not to obtain a tax break. They want things like good schools, a safe community, more living space, etc. I just can't imagine that say, someone from NYC that is currently renting a 500 sqft apartment, and is now married with a child, is going to continue renting because they won't get a tax break. There is still going to be a demand for good schools, more space, etc. that far outweighs the bonus of whatever tax break they may achieve buy purchasing a home. When I bought my first home, a tax break was not even considered as one of my drivers for buying instead of renting.

Some people may have considered the tax break when calculating if they could afford the house they purchased.
If they were on the edge of affording it without the break they may have a problem.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2017, 05:41 AM
 
Location: NJ
4,940 posts, read 12,138,851 times
Reputation: 4562
Quote:
Originally Posted by beachouse View Post
Some people may have considered the tax break when calculating if they could afford the house they purchased.
If they were on the edge of affording it without the break they may have a problem.
I understand your point. But realistically, if someone needs a tax break to be able to afford their home, they probably should not be buying that home in the first place. I see any tax break as a year end bonus, not something that should be factored into one's budget when making a purchase.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2017, 07:49 AM
 
Location: NJ
516 posts, read 1,005,058 times
Reputation: 482
Quote:
Originally Posted by ansky View Post
I understand your point. But realistically, if someone needs a tax break to be able to afford their home, they probably should not be buying that home in the first place. I see any tax break as a year end bonus, not something that should be factored into one's budget when making a purchase.
For me, I don't think about the tax break on a dollar basis when buying the home. I look at previous year's AGI, subtract out all the state and fed taxes I paid at filing time to calculate the "net" pay, then make my budget off that. So I would subtract out health insurance, 401K, commuting, daycare, etc from the net pay. If I lose the ability to itemize (which is huge because those deductions come off your highest tax bracket), then my "net" pay would fall by a several tens of thousand of dollars, which of course would affect how much home I can afford.

Phrasing it as a tax break is erroneous, it should be whether or not a tax increase would affect someone's ability to afford a home.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2017, 08:37 AM
 
Location: NJ
4,940 posts, read 12,138,851 times
Reputation: 4562
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrsPiggleWiggle View Post
For me, I don't think about the tax break on a dollar basis when buying the home. I look at previous year's AGI, subtract out all the state and fed taxes I paid at filing time to calculate the "net" pay, then make my budget off that. So I would subtract out health insurance, 401K, commuting, daycare, etc from the net pay. If I lose the ability to itemize (which is huge because those deductions come off your highest tax bracket), then my "net" pay would fall by a several tens of thousand of dollars, which of course would affect how much home I can afford.

Phrasing it as a tax break is erroneous, it should be whether or not a tax increase would affect someone's ability to afford a home.
You make good points, and you help to solidify the point I've been trying to make. These tax issues are very complicated, so when an organization makes a blanket statement that homes will drop "14-21%" is just plain irresponsible.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2017, 01:37 PM
 
857 posts, read 833,809 times
Reputation: 653
Quote:
Originally Posted by ansky View Post
I understand your point. But realistically, if someone needs a tax break to be able to afford their home, they probably should not be buying that home in the first place. I see any tax break as a year end bonus, not something that should be factored into one's budget when making a purchase.
In today’s market I’d agree. When rates were at 12 plus percent plus then the tax breaks were definitely figured into the purchase.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2017, 04:41 AM
 
4,399 posts, read 10,665,748 times
Reputation: 2383
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrsPiggleWiggle View Post
For me, I don't think about the tax break on a dollar basis when buying the home. I look at previous year's AGI, subtract out all the state and fed taxes I paid at filing time to calculate the "net" pay, then make my budget off that. So I would subtract out health insurance, 401K, commuting, daycare, etc from the net pay. If I lose the ability to itemize (which is huge because those deductions come off your highest tax bracket), then my "net" pay would fall by a several tens of thousand of dollars, which of course would affect how much home I can afford.

Phrasing it as a tax break is erroneous, it should be whether or not a tax increase would affect someone's ability to afford a home.
It's not erroneous at all. Part of the calculation on whether to rent vs buy is in which situation you would be financially better off. Not just what you can afford.
I could afford to flush the $20 bill that's in my wallet down the toilet and still be ok financially, doesn't mean I'm going to do it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:



Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:19 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top