Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I wrote a post on City-Data before that was called, "Would you rather live in a city, suburb, or exurb?" So basically, I am a person who prefers to live in either:
1. A town that is exurban but has easy access to the suburbs (In other words, the exurban area is
close to a metropolitan region).
2. A town that is suburban and exurban at the same time.
The only towns I ever been to in Sussex County is Sparta, Hopatcong, and Stanhope. The thing that's common about these three towns is that they all have a body of water, but I am not particular about those things (Google Earth shows me that Sussex County has way too many lakes).
So what other states have you lived/visited in that have these Sussex County type of neighborhoods? Give me examples of town names.
Google Earth shows me that Sussex County has way too many lakes
That is definitely problematic for the discriminating home-seeker. How many of those lakes in Sussex County do you think they should fill-in with rubble?
That is definitely problematic for the discriminating home-seeker. How many of those lakes in Sussex County do you think they should fill-in with rubble?
Sorry, I should reword my post. There is nothing wrong with having too many bodies of water in a county. Living extremely close to one would be bad for hurricanes, floods, and nor'easters. I am not particular about having bodies of water in a town, but I just wouldn't want to have my property border against water.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.