Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-21-2018, 03:26 PM
 
Location: MMU->ABE->ATL->ASH
9,317 posts, read 20,993,806 times
Reputation: 10443

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by BugsyPal View Post

From another post; no, RR's didn't require federal money to build infrastructure. They did it themselves and often simply funded such projects by floating bonds. The PRR didn't receive any federal funding (IIRC) to build the vast network (including tunnels and bridges) that became the mainline/NEC.


.

The Expansion of RR in the US especially out west did get massive federal subsidies. They got $16k-48K per mile (436K-1.3M / Mile in current USD) Plus Land Grands of millions of square miles of land, that they could develop.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-21-2018, 03:34 PM
 
329 posts, read 203,958 times
Reputation: 388
Quote:
Originally Posted by Retriever View Post


I'm not a Civil Engineer, but even I know that building/rebuilding the Portal Bridge involves a lot more than flattening dirt and laying down sod. In case you aren't aware of the... cost-saving... business practices to which I referred, this should prove to be informative:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...uits/85297274/

I was refering to municipalities in NJ extorting taxpayers into financing highschool football fields.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2018, 03:36 PM
 
2,669 posts, read 2,089,301 times
Reputation: 3690
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainNJ View Post
absolutely unnecessary. if they cant make a profit, then they shouldnt exist.
OK, so how should people travel? Roads do not make a profit either. And you would need to build a lot of new roads to accommodate all the drivers who use public transportation.


The tools on NJ Turnpike, the most expensive road in the US, do not quite cover the Operating Expenses. They come close, it is 93%. See page 18 of the budget document:
http://www.njta.com/media/3476/2018_budget_document.pdf


I guess all NJ roads should introduce tolls like NJ Turnpike...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2018, 03:53 PM
46H
 
1,652 posts, read 1,398,714 times
Reputation: 3620
Quote:
Originally Posted by DefiantNJ View Post
OK, so how should people travel? Roads do not make a profit either. And you would need to build a lot of new roads to accommodate all the drivers who use public transportation.


The tools on NJ Turnpike, the most expensive road in the US, do not quite cover the Operating Expenses. They come close, it is 93%. See page 18 of the budget document:
http://www.njta.com/media/3476/2018_budget_document.pdf


I guess all NJ roads should introduce tolls like NJ Turnpike...

It is simple, put an EZ Pass toll on every driveway, municipal road, county road, state road and federal road. Then, when driving 12 miles to work takes 2.5 hours and cost $18 in tolls, commuters will be wondering what happened to all the "unprofitable" trains and buses.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2018, 10:27 AM
 
Location: NJ
31,771 posts, read 40,672,588 times
Reputation: 24590
Quote:
Originally Posted by DefiantNJ View Post
OK, so how should people travel? Roads do not make a profit either. And you would need to build a lot of new roads to accommodate all the drivers who use public transportation.


The tools on NJ Turnpike, the most expensive road in the US, do not quite cover the Operating Expenses. They come close, it is 93%. See page 18 of the budget document:
http://www.njta.com/media/3476/2018_budget_document.pdf


I guess all NJ roads should introduce tolls like NJ Turnpike...
its not really my place to decide how other people will travel. i just know that the users of a good or service should be paying at least for its full cost.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2018, 05:26 PM
 
31,897 posts, read 26,926,466 times
Reputation: 24789
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainNJ View Post
its not really my place to decide how other people will travel. i just know that the users of a good or service should be paying at least for its full cost.

What we're trying to tell you is for mass/public transit that does not nor ever will apply. It just isn't possible. Every single mode of transportation in this country; motor vehicles, airplanes, rail, etc.. *ALL* to some extent receive direct and or indirect federal/local funding.


For your information Amtrak's farebox recovery rates match those of many European railroads; over 75%.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farebox_recovery_ratio


OTOH it is the locally run commuter rail services where you see rates below 50%. NJT is around 45%, and people are moaning now. Take away federal funding and NJT fares would rise steeply, so much so that many would likely abandon trains and drive; something New Jersey does *NOT* want.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2018, 07:35 PM
 
Location: Elsewhere
88,515 posts, read 84,688,123 times
Reputation: 114969
Quote:
Originally Posted by BugsyPal View Post
What we're trying to tell you is for mass/public transit that does not nor ever will apply. It just isn't possible. Every single mode of transportation in this country; motor vehicles, airplanes, rail, etc.. *ALL* to some extent receive direct and or indirect federal/local funding.


For your information Amtrak's farebox recovery rates match those of many European railroads; over 75%.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farebox_recovery_ratio


OTOH it is the locally run commuter rail services where you see rates below 50%. NJT is around 45%, and people are moaning now. Take away federal funding and NJT fares would rise steeply, so much so that many would likely abandon trains and drive; something New Jersey does *NOT* want.
Captain doesn't care. He doesn't want to pay for it and thinks only the users should. That's him. Let it go, because no matter how badly he wants it to be that way, we know it ain't never gonna happen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2018, 11:25 PM
 
10,222 posts, read 19,201,005 times
Reputation: 10894
Farebox recovery is only for operating expenses. Capital expenditures aren't covered and are 100% subsidy for every mode except private automobile.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-28-2018, 04:17 AM
 
Location: New Jersey
2,653 posts, read 5,958,530 times
Reputation: 2331
Don't feed the Right-Wing trolls
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:53 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top