Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-21-2018, 06:52 AM
 
31,765 posts, read 26,734,061 times
Reputation: 24655

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by nybbler View Post
OK, but does this come with a long-term agreement on trackage fees? Normally you don't pay for capital improvements to infrastructure you're just renting.

We're not talking about ROW rights like when Amtrak runs one train a day or every other over a freight track. NJT is the second highest user of the Portal Bridge and indeed the NEC (at least the ROW in NJ and part of PA) behind Amtrak.


Just as with Penn Station and so forth it is the shoving of NJT trains onto the former PRR ROW that has caused a huge strain on system and infrastructure. Thus it is only fair and right that New Jersey/NJT pony up their fair share.


Again not that it would happen, but if Amtrak did kick NJT off NEC and out of Penn Station both the state of NJ and its residents would be royally screwed.


Things would be no different if PRR or Penn-Central were still around and owed things. Either would be looking to NJT/state of NJ to cough up to cover their heavy use of the ROW.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-21-2018, 08:35 AM
 
Location: NJ
31,771 posts, read 40,594,272 times
Reputation: 24590
Quote:
Originally Posted by BugsyPal View Post
Point is something widely recognized and accepted elsewhere, but still gives many Americans fits; there are simply some things which require government (federal and or local) intervention. Private sector either will not, cannot, or if allowed to have a free hand subject consumers to vast market forces.
that isnt really true.

however, you certainly dont need the federal government to handle transportation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2018, 08:39 AM
 
329 posts, read 203,005 times
Reputation: 388
Quote:
Originally Posted by Retriever View Post
The obvious solution it to apply classic tRump business practices to this situation, by simply refusing to pay the contractors when payment comes due!

If it has worked for him numerous times in Atlantic City and in other locations where he was involved in building projects, then why not apply it to other types of construction projects?
Flattening dirt, and laying down sod shouldn't cost $3million. And remember that time Zuckerberg donated $100million to Newark for public school reform and Booker made it disappear.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2018, 08:57 AM
 
19,072 posts, read 25,235,075 times
Reputation: 25397
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harry88 View Post
Flattening dirt, and laying down sod shouldn't cost $3million.


I'm not a Civil Engineer, but even I know that building/rebuilding the Portal Bridge involves a lot more than flattening dirt and laying down sod. In case you aren't aware of the... cost-saving... business practices to which I referred, this should prove to be informative:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...uits/85297274/

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2018, 09:15 AM
 
2,664 posts, read 2,080,832 times
Reputation: 3685
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainNJ View Post
that isnt really true.

however, you certainly dont need the federal government to handle transportation.

Most public transportation is by its nature a non for profit service. Passenger fees can not cover the full cost of the actual trip and the cost of infrastructure maintenance. If the fairs were raised to cover these costs, passengers would not be able to afford to use this mode of transportation. Some federal government assistance is always needed. Even when a private bus company is supposedly making money running buses on existing roads it is in reality subsidized by the government. State, federal and local governments pay to maintain and upgrade the roads that are used by the bus company to be profitable.


In case of the railroads, government subsidies are always needed to maintain the infrastructure. In cases of particular expensive components, such as bridges and tunnels, federal support is always required just because these items are prohibitively expensive. This is a common situation in most of the Western countries with normal public transportation system...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2018, 09:49 AM
 
Location: NJ
31,771 posts, read 40,594,272 times
Reputation: 24590
Quote:
Originally Posted by DefiantNJ View Post
Most public transportation is by its nature a non for profit service. Passenger fees can not cover the full cost of the actual trip and the cost of infrastructure maintenance. If the fairs were raised to cover these costs, passengers would not be able to afford to use this mode of transportation. Some federal government assistance is always needed. Even when a private bus company is supposedly making money running buses on existing roads it is in reality subsidized by the government. State, federal and local governments pay to maintain and upgrade the roads that are used by the bus company to be profitable.


In case of the railroads, government subsidies are always needed to maintain the infrastructure. In cases of particular expensive components, such as bridges and tunnels, federal support is always required just because these items are prohibitively expensive. This is a common situation in most of the Western countries with normal public transportation system...
this is a funny concept. because people have become used to the government subsidizing a business, they actually believe that the business couldnt exist without the government.

if people value public transportation, they will pay for its cost.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2018, 10:04 AM
 
Location: Elsewhere
88,348 posts, read 84,351,936 times
Reputation: 114691
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainNJ View Post
this is a funny concept. because people have become used to the government subsidizing a business, they actually believe that the business couldnt exist without the government.

if people value public transportation, they will pay for its cost.
They can't afford to pay its cost. You know that.

If the government via the FRA, FTA, FAA, and whatever other agencies is going to set down all these regulations on how these businesses must conduct themselves and ask for proof of compliance, then they should indeed contribute toward what it will cost those businesses to comply.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2018, 10:43 AM
 
Location: NJ
31,771 posts, read 40,594,272 times
Reputation: 24590
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mightyqueen801 View Post
They can't afford to pay its cost. You know that.

If the government via the FRA, FTA, FAA, and whatever other agencies is going to set down all these regulations on how these businesses must conduct themselves and ask for proof of compliance, then they should indeed contribute toward what it will cost those businesses to comply.
that is a big part of the problem. the government drives up the cost. if the government removed itself from the equation, then people could afford to pay the cost of their transportation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2018, 10:43 AM
 
2,664 posts, read 2,080,832 times
Reputation: 3685
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainNJ View Post
this is a funny concept. because people have become used to the government subsidizing a business, they actually believe that the business couldnt exist without the government.

if people value public transportation, they will pay for its cost.

No they will not since the costs will be astronomical. And if they can't afford public transportation, most commuters will try to drive, making yours and everyone else's drive to work even more miserable. I do believe you mentioned before that you drive to work? And public transportation is not a for profit business; it is a service.


But I don't understand why you are rallying so much against government support for public transportation but apparently OK with government support for roads. Don't you think federal government shouldn't help pay for highways as well? Let all roads become for profit toll roads, paid entirely by tolls. I shudder to think what this would look like...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2018, 10:45 AM
 
Location: NJ
31,771 posts, read 40,594,272 times
Reputation: 24590
Quote:
Originally Posted by DefiantNJ View Post
No they will not since the costs will be astronomical. And if they can't afford public transportation, most commuters will try to drive, making yours and everyone else's drive to work even more miserable. I do believe you mentioned before that you drive to work? And public transportation is not a for profit business; it is a service.


But I don't understand why you are rallying so much against government support for public transportation but apparently OK with government support for roads. Don't you think federal government shouldn't help pay for highways as well? Let all roads become for profit toll roads, paid entirely by tolls. I shudder to think what this would look like...
services are still for profit businesses and public transportation should be no different. the costs dont have to be astronomical.

i am not rallying for anything mass transit vs roads. in this discussion i am speaking against federal involvement in transportation.

get rid of the federal government first.

then get rid of the local government.

its funny how driving seems to be a for profit business and tax revenue maker but magically public transit cant possibly be that way. people are so funny how they are trained to believe that once government gets involved in something that it couldnt possibly be done without government.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:



Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top