Nazis in Holland Township????? WOW (Bayonne, Long Branch: store, racist, Wal-mart)

[EEEPNJ]

Originally Posted by njkate

Wow!! I really pity these poor kids growing up, they are doomed with the idiots they have for parents

Which is why in some countries, like Germany, they can say NO to a name. A couple wanted to name their child Osama Bin Laden there and they were prohibited from doing so.

[EEEPNJ]

Originally Posted by findinghope

can you imagine what their teachers will have to go through once they start school and learn about WWII? that will cause some problems and some psych problems for the kids as well...

Unless they are homeschooled...lots of these psycho types will do that.

[EEEPNJ]

Originally Posted by tahiti

i can honestly say if i was living there and had kids the same age, no way in hell would they be allowed to play with them. sorry, but the truth.

And I agree 150% Tahiti.

[EEEPNJ]

Originally Posted by Gerania

I was in Germany and got to watch part of a day long white supremicist rally. The government had everyone out. The police and military were there with a show of force. We're talking rocket launchers and armored personal carriers, everybody in riot gear, bigger stuff off in the distance.

We should have left but were transfixed. We got a wurst and a bier from a nearby Imbiss and just stood and watched the show. We were lucky that nothing happened. I understand that some of those events turned into big, nasty riots.

When was this?

[EEEPNJ]

Originally Posted by mike0421

From a legal standpoint, ShopRite has the right to throw them off their property. They can refuse service to anyone! They did the right thing.

Agreed Mike. And S-R reps did say that. They have the right to deny anything they deem offensive from being put on the cake... but props to my favorite store :sarcasm: Wal-Mart for complying....

[EEEPNJ]

Originally Posted by njkate

It's a thin line but I think this is exactly what the parents are up to..lawsuit.

I read in one of the articles this is the 3rd time Shop rite refused, don't know if that is true but if it is I'm sure the parents made sure it received media attention for the potential lawsuit..all though I can't fathom what lawyer would take their case...I'm sure there is a shark out there that would even just for a settlement

Guess living off SSI is not enough for them.

[CuCullin]

Originally Posted by EEEPNJ

Guess living off SSI is not enough for them.

So, still supporting the welfare programs, seeing who uses them, and what they do with it?

And WELL DONE ShopRite, well done. I think I'll go a bit further, past the A+P, and on to SR when I go food shopping this weekend

[EEEPNJ]

Cucu - I only support programs for those truly in need....not sponges...I've made that point MANY times.

[mike0421]

You know, I was just thinking about this subject a little while ago, outside (doing a survey). I really, really hope these little $hits take this case to court, because I want to see if the judge even gives this case standing. To me, this is a matter of a private business choosing how to run their business, and private property rights are also an issue here. I'd like to see this get summary judgment, and set a precedent for such frivolous litigious activity.

And, I also think that British common law courts are onto something: in civil court cases, you lose, you pay the court fees. That would give these spam-suckers pause before choosing to engage in subsequent litigious activity.

This is one reason I have a keen interest in politics, because there is a real stake in who gets appointed to the bench. I hope the courts follow the letter of the law, and interpret it correctly, instead of writing it from the bench.

[njkate]

Originally Posted by mike0421

You know, I was just thinking about this subject a little while ago, outside (doing a survey). I really, really hope these little $hits take this case to court, because I want to see if the judge even gives this case standing. To me, this is a matter of a private business choosing how to run their business, and private property rights are also an issue here. I'd like to see this get summary judgment, and set a precedent for such frivolous litigious activity.

And, I also think that British common law courts are onto something: in civil court cases, you lose, you pay the court fees. That would give these spam-suckers pause before choosing to engage in subsequent litigious activity.

This is one reason I have a keen interest in politics, because there is a real stake in who gets appointed to the bench. I hope the courts follow the letter of the law, and interpret it correctly, instead of writing it from the bench.

Agree!!!!