Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Re consolidation. On the surface, it sounds like one good place to start but currently I don't have enough faith in the state to manage ANYTHING that is not in the interests of perpetuating the apparatus' status quo.
They just seem to resist it. And successfully, too
You've asked many good questions.
Now I have a few.
Why would one NOT vote for for Christy (assuming he's not a criminal, certified lunatic, refuses to talk to the press etc.). What do we have to lose, really?
Who in the hell are those 46% that would re-elect Corzine and, more importantly, WHY?
I agree 150% with this post and have got to wonder myself about the 46%. Why would the people of those counties be for him? What did he do for them??
Plain and simple, we can't afford 4 more years of Corzine.
I agree 150% with this post and have got to wonder myself about the 46%. Why would the people of those counties be for him? What did he do for them??
Plain and simple, we can't afford 4 more years of Corzine.
Lets be real here. There are those on both sides that will vote party line no matter what.
I agree 150% with this post and have got to wonder myself about the 46%. Why would the people of those counties be for him? What did he do for them??Plain and simple, we can't afford 4 more years of Corzine.
Doesn't everyone complain that Corzine caters to the urban cities and they are the beneficiaries of his policies (whatever they are)? If so, do you blame those residents for voting for him? Don't people vote for THEIR best interests?
You're right, Tahiti, they do. I would just really LOVE to know what he's done for them to gain such loyalty. Loyalty for what reasons othere than he's a dem.
Do people not see that it's really logical to take a look at what someone has done before pledging support?
Doesn't everyone complain that Corzine caters to the urban cities and they are the beneficiaries of his policies (whatever they are)? If so, do you blame those residents for voting for him? Don't people vote for THEIR best interests?
Well one is the 3 billion that went on top of the prior 8.8 billion that he just applied to school construction without any vote from the public.That money goes into the cities. WE pay for our schools with our property taxes in the burbs.I know stop whining we are all rich. LOL
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
