U.S. Cities  
Happy New Year 2010!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey
Register Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 700,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 15,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads.

Get a detailed profile
Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply


 
Old 04-07-2009, 03:18 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
4,775 posts, read 2,335,148 times
Reputation: 1283
doc1 has much to be proud ofdoc1 has much to be proud ofdoc1 has much to be proud ofdoc1 has much to be proud ofdoc1 has much to be proud ofdoc1 has much to be proud ofdoc1 has much to be proud ofdoc1 has much to be proud ofdoc1 has much to be proud ofdoc1 has much to be proud ofdoc1 has much to be proud ofdoc1 has much to be proud ofdoc1 has much to be proud ofdoc1 has much to be proud ofdoc1 has much to be proud ofdoc1 has much to be proud ofdoc1 has much to be proud ofdoc1 has much to be proud ofdoc1 has much to be proud of
How are we going to power up our green n' clean Prius'?

Or increase electrified rail to increase mass transit options?

Maybe a few steady rolling brownouts, when the weather's at it's worst, will force us to make hard decisions regarding our energy infrastructure and not protest every viable solution.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-07-2009, 07:59 AM
Forever a Yankee
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: North Jersey
6,047 posts, read 4,103,267 times
Reputation: 1683
njkate has a brilliant futurenjkate has a brilliant futurenjkate has a brilliant futurenjkate has a brilliant futurenjkate has a brilliant futurenjkate has a brilliant futurenjkate has a brilliant futurenjkate has a brilliant futurenjkate has a brilliant futurenjkate has a brilliant futurenjkate has a brilliant futurenjkate has a brilliant futurenjkate has a brilliant futurenjkate has a brilliant futurenjkate has a brilliant futurenjkate has a brilliant futurenjkate has a brilliant futurenjkate has a brilliant futurenjkate has a brilliant futurenjkate has a brilliant futurenjkate has a brilliant futurenjkate has a brilliant futurenjkate has a brilliant future
I live in Jefferson..from that map it doesn't look all that bad...
sheesh If I have a 90 plus degree day with 100% humidity I want my freakin a/c to work...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2009, 09:28 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
2,098 posts, read 1,175,351 times
Reputation: 571
clevedark is a name known to allclevedark is a name known to allclevedark is a name known to allclevedark is a name known to allclevedark is a name known to allclevedark is a name known to allclevedark is a name known to allclevedark is a name known to allclevedark is a name known to allclevedark is a name known to allclevedark is a name known to all
Well, at least the OP has discovered the cause of CANCER. Anyone have an extra Nobel prize handy?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2009, 09:35 AM
Real Estate Agent
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northern NJ
285 posts, read 159,811 times
Blog Entries: 3
Reputation: 131
Marc Paolella will become famous soon enoughMarc Paolella will become famous soon enoughMarc Paolella will become famous soon enough
I believe I read that the purpose of the higher towers is to keep EMF's equivalent to what they are now from the lower towers. So in theory, 750 Kv at 185 feet emits the same EMF's as 125kv at 125ft. Don't know if that's true, but that's what I read.

At that point, the higher towers do become an eyesoar, but what ya gonna do? In my experience, homes near power lines sell for 5-15% less than the same homes away from power lines. 15% if the tower is in your yard, 5% if the wires are not on top of you but just "there".

Ultimately we need the power, so it's just a sacrifice we have to make for the benefit of all. But people who hate them still have plenty of options. 95% of all homes have no visual exposure to power lines.

As far as the EMF's. The best approach is to study those who work for power companies. We have 50 years of history of humans being exposed to ungodly higher EMF's than any of us will ever remotely experience. The studies are all over the map, with some noting no effect while others note a possible effect. None categorically prove that there is a definite risk. None categorically prove that there is NO risk. So if that's the case with guys who hang near EMF's every day, I doubt there is much risk for those of us who just live near the towers.

But as I said, we need the towers. And even more than that we need nuclear power. If we were to depend on solar and wind at current levels of technology our monthly electrical bills would be $3,000. It's just not remotely doable at the present time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2009, 10:07 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
315 posts, read 148,536 times
Reputation: 161
AndrewMensch has a spectacular aura aboutAndrewMensch has a spectacular aura aboutAndrewMensch has a spectacular aura aboutAndrewMensch has a spectacular aura about
The problem with this... and the economy... and Wall Street... and....

is that we all think about the next fiscal quarter, or the next year, and we have to start thinking about the next 10-20-30-50 years. We need a little of everything. Make fun of the Prius if you want, but if GM and others joined in years ago in this kind of venture, we'd be further along and would be saving more energy. Maybe GM would have been better off in the long run. But they and others are focused on IMMEDIATE RESULTS. This does make sense since this is how we are judged at work, and in the end, it is about us having money to feed our families. Corporations have to change this outlook, and so do the rest of us.

Instead, it is all about how much power I have TODAY... what the fiscal results are THIS QUARTER, with no vision for years down the road.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2009, 11:30 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: n.j.
1,339 posts, read 773,243 times
Reputation: 263
dhanu86 is a jewel in the roughdhanu86 is a jewel in the roughdhanu86 is a jewel in the roughdhanu86 is a jewel in the roughdhanu86 is a jewel in the roughdhanu86 is a jewel in the rough
Send a message via AIM to dhanu86 Send a message via MSN to dhanu86 Send a message via Yahoo to dhanu86
I think we should be looking for ways to be more environmental friendly which means using solar panels etc so there's no need for these new giant powerlines hanging over neighborhoods. On the otherhand they're as normal to me as trees. If 195 ft is even taller than the current ones then that could be an issue if they're viewable from street after street from people's upstair window.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2009, 12:02 PM
Holy crap- 3 bars- WOOHOO!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
475 posts, read 341,448 times
Reputation: 150
tallguylehigh has a spectacular aura abouttallguylehigh has a spectacular aura abouttallguylehigh has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by dhanu86 View Post
I think we should be looking for ways to be more environmental friendly which means using solar panels etc so there's no need for these new giant powerlines hanging over neighborhoods. On the otherhand they're as normal to me as trees. If 195 ft is even taller than the current ones then that could be an issue if they're viewable from street after street from people's upstair window.
That is a possibility in a mainly "horizontal" living environment (single family homes, etc.). But that isn't what these power lines are for. This electricity is for the more densly populated areas of eastern NJ and NYC. The solar panel looses a lot of luster when you have buildings with relatively small roof square footage in relation to their height. You could cover the roof of a 40 story NYC apartment with solar panels, but there is no way they are going to generate enough power for everyone underneath them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2009, 12:36 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: n.j.
1,339 posts, read 773,243 times
Reputation: 263
dhanu86 is a jewel in the roughdhanu86 is a jewel in the roughdhanu86 is a jewel in the roughdhanu86 is a jewel in the roughdhanu86 is a jewel in the roughdhanu86 is a jewel in the rough
Send a message via AIM to dhanu86 Send a message via MSN to dhanu86 Send a message via Yahoo to dhanu86
Quote:
Originally Posted by tallguylehigh View Post
That is a possibility in a mainly "horizontal" living environment (single family homes, etc.). But that isn't what these power lines are for. This electricity is for the more densly populated areas of eastern NJ and NYC. The solar panel looses a lot of luster when you have buildings with relatively small roof square footage in relation to their height. You could cover the roof of a 40 story NYC apartment with solar panels, but there is no way they are going to generate enough power for everyone underneath them.
I see. The video link the OP shared said that in 2011 the current powerlines won't be good be enough, I guess because of population growth across the map.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2009, 08:30 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
369 posts, read 206,012 times
Reputation: 90
sligogirl will become famous soon enoughsligogirl will become famous soon enough
My neighbor died of a rare pancreatic cancer, gone in less than one year.
He worked at a PSEG's power station 30+ years.
IMO there something to truly consider by not living near power lines, transfer stations.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2009, 12:17 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
60 posts, read 57,681 times
Reputation: 16
practicalposts is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnZ963 View Post
This NIMBY crap gets unbelieveable. The electric company isn't doing this for the heck of it. With all of the development in northern NJ/NYC area over the years, the demand for power is greater than ever. Ok, so maybe NYC gets a lot of the benefit. Where do you expect them to put the lines to get power from PA to NY? Lines like these can't be put underground for many reasons. Sure, these towers are ugly. Nobody forces anyone to buy a house next to them. If you buy a house near a powerline easement, you should understand that the electric company may alter/expand the lines, trim the trees, etc.

Everyone loves cheap, plentiful electricity until their backyard view is involved. Rant over.
this is most logical post, when I was looking for house I passed couple of them because they had electric lines going behind the house, which are not ugly as of yet but I learned from township that the utility company has easement for 500-1000 feet and they may add as many lines they can accomodate without much legal issues.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



Reply


Quick Reply
Message:

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads


Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:21 AM.

Copyright © 2005-2009, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 - Top