U.S. Cities  
Merry Christmas!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey
Register Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 700,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 15,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads.

Get a detailed profile
Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply


 
Old 05-05-2009, 12:57 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
2 posts, read 878 times
Reputation: 10
Dancingtickmark is on a distinguished road
Default Thinking of Buying (Condo) for First Time

Hi new to forum.

I am a 26 year old who is thinking of buying property for the first time and after seeing some good posts here thought I'd try.

Currently I work in New York and am trying to lighten my commute a bit. I was looking online at some decently priced condos in the Guttenberg/West New York/Fort Lee areas. After buying a new car and student loans I don't have as much saved up as I'd like. Was looking to spend up to $150K. Any thoughts? Is this worth it? Am I buying into a trap? Would I be better off saving the extra $50k and maybe going for a cheap house around $200K?

Your $.02 is greatly appreciated.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-05-2009, 01:05 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Jersey City, NJ
1,910 posts, read 686,359 times
Reputation: 322
elflord1973 is a jewel in the roughelflord1973 is a jewel in the roughelflord1973 is a jewel in the roughelflord1973 is a jewel in the roughelflord1973 is a jewel in the roughelflord1973 is a jewel in the roughelflord1973 is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dancingtickmark View Post
Hi new to forum.

I am a 26 year old who is thinking of buying property for the first time and after seeing some good posts here thought I'd try.

Currently I work in New York and am trying to lighten my commute a bit. I was looking online at some decently priced condos in the Guttenberg/West New York/Fort Lee areas. After buying a new car and student loans I don't have as much saved up as I'd like. Was looking to spend up to $150K. Any thoughts? Is this worth it? Am I buying into a trap? Would I be better off saving the extra $50k and maybe going for a cheap house around $200K?

Your $.02 is greatly appreciated.
The upside of saving an extra 50K is that by the time you've done that, there will be more places that have fallen under 200k.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2009, 08:02 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Teaneck, NJ
1,602 posts, read 1,009,773 times
Reputation: 442
Newarkbomb is just really niceNewarkbomb is just really niceNewarkbomb is just really niceNewarkbomb is just really niceNewarkbomb is just really niceNewarkbomb is just really niceNewarkbomb is just really niceNewarkbomb is just really niceNewarkbomb is just really nice
Hackensack's highrises along prospect ave can go for that price for a one bedroom..

Check this out! it's only 110K
280 Prospect Ave Unit: 11H, Hackensack, NJ, 07601 - MLS ID#2900710 - Condo/Townhome/Row Home/Co-Op real estate - REALTOR.com®
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2009, 09:17 PM
Real Estate Agent
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Martinsville, NJ
2,484 posts, read 1,335,117 times
Reputation: 1169
Bill Keegan has much to be proud ofBill Keegan has much to be proud ofBill Keegan has much to be proud ofBill Keegan has much to be proud ofBill Keegan has much to be proud ofBill Keegan has much to be proud ofBill Keegan has much to be proud ofBill Keegan has much to be proud ofBill Keegan has much to be proud ofBill Keegan has much to be proud ofBill Keegan has much to be proud ofBill Keegan has much to be proud ofBill Keegan has much to be proud ofBill Keegan has much to be proud ofBill Keegan has much to be proud ofBill Keegan has much to be proud ofBill Keegan has much to be proud ofBill Keegan has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by elflord1973 View Post
The upside of saving an extra 50K is that by the time you've done that, there will be more places that have fallen under 200k.
In your opinion. You can't present that sort of opinion as if it's a fact. It may or may not happen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2009, 09:31 PM
Real Estate Sales Associate (NJ)
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Central New Jersey
1,163 posts, read 1,136,473 times
Reputation: 146
DodgeViper01 will become famous soon enoughDodgeViper01 will become famous soon enoughDodgeViper01 will become famous soon enough
I agree with Bill but I am almost 100% sure that unless we have some major event this is not going to happen. And besides with the tax credit for first time buyers and the LOW 5% interest rates, you can save a lot more now than ever before. If you buy a house now for $25K more than next year but interest rates are 6% next year, you are still coming out ahead $20K at the end of the mortgage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2009, 09:44 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Jersey City, NJ
1,910 posts, read 686,359 times
Reputation: 322
elflord1973 is a jewel in the roughelflord1973 is a jewel in the roughelflord1973 is a jewel in the roughelflord1973 is a jewel in the roughelflord1973 is a jewel in the roughelflord1973 is a jewel in the roughelflord1973 is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Keegan View Post
In your opinion. You can't present that sort of opinion as if it's a fact. It may or may not happen.
It's not merely an opinion, it is a prediction. It is a prediction I can support with plenty of data. Which type do you prefer -- valuation indicators ? trend indicators ?

My personal favourite is a purely market-driven valuation indicator -- the Case Shiller futures market. This basically creates a market for future values of the index. What I like about these is that they are market driven numbers, so they are a pretty good estimate given the facts on the ground today (to put it another way, it's today's market value of tomorrow's house).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2009, 09:54 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Jersey City, NJ
1,910 posts, read 686,359 times
Reputation: 322
elflord1973 is a jewel in the roughelflord1973 is a jewel in the roughelflord1973 is a jewel in the roughelflord1973 is a jewel in the roughelflord1973 is a jewel in the roughelflord1973 is a jewel in the roughelflord1973 is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by DodgeViper01 View Post
I agree with Bill but I am almost 100% sure that unless we have some major event this is not going to happen.
By "this", I take it you are referring to the proposition in my post -- more places falling below 200K. If you are arguing that this won't happen, is it your position that prices will not fall unless there is a major event ? Or is it your position that prices in aggregate will fall, but that the lower end of the market is immune to price drops ?

If it's the former, this not only doesn't require a "major event", it merely requires more of the same. As a real estate agent, you surely pay attention to trends like the Case Shiller index which shows a steady stream of downticks.

If the latter, well that's just false, and stratified price indices show it.

Quote:
And besides with the tax credit for first time buyers and the LOW 5% interest rates, you can save a lot more now than ever before. If you buy a house now for $25K more than next year but interest rates are 6% next year, you are still coming out ahead $20K at the end of the mortgage.
Loans have an embedded option. Here are three basic facts about the embedded option:

(1) you can make prepayments or refinance any time. This amounts to a "call option on your debt".

(2) the option is worth more if the rate is higher. That is, suppose you have a choice between a low rate loan with a high principal, and a high rate loan with a lower principal, and the payments on both loans are the same. Then you should always take the loan with the higher rate.

(3) higher rates put downward pressure on prices. If rates are going to get higher, then prices have to get lower.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2009, 10:08 PM
Real Estate Agent
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Martinsville, NJ
2,484 posts, read 1,335,117 times
Reputation: 1169
Bill Keegan has much to be proud ofBill Keegan has much to be proud ofBill Keegan has much to be proud ofBill Keegan has much to be proud ofBill Keegan has much to be proud ofBill Keegan has much to be proud ofBill Keegan has much to be proud ofBill Keegan has much to be proud ofBill Keegan has much to be proud ofBill Keegan has much to be proud ofBill Keegan has much to be proud ofBill Keegan has much to be proud ofBill Keegan has much to be proud ofBill Keegan has much to be proud ofBill Keegan has much to be proud ofBill Keegan has much to be proud ofBill Keegan has much to be proud ofBill Keegan has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by elflord1973 View Post
It's not merely an opinion, it is a prediction. It is a prediction I can support with plenty of data. Which type do you prefer -- valuation indicators ? trend indicators ?

My personal favourite is a purely market-driven valuation indicator -- the Case Shiller futures market. This basically creates a market for future values of the index. What I like about these is that they are market driven numbers, so they are a pretty good estimate given the facts on the ground today (to put it another way, it's today's market value of tomorrow's house).
Case Schiller is widely publicized, and often pointed to as some sort of authority on the housing market. But it's got a major flaw in that it takes all it's data from the 20 largest markets in the US. The 20 most heavily populated cities. I contend those cities are not a benchmark for the rest of the nation. That being said, I'd also ask how CS "predicts" future values. What data does it look at to decide in what direction and by how much the prices will move. I'll admit I've not studied the CS methodology, but on the surface it simply says the downward trend will continue at the same angle. Why do they believe that to be the case? Why do you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2009, 10:15 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Jersey City, NJ
1,910 posts, read 686,359 times
Reputation: 322
elflord1973 is a jewel in the roughelflord1973 is a jewel in the roughelflord1973 is a jewel in the roughelflord1973 is a jewel in the roughelflord1973 is a jewel in the roughelflord1973 is a jewel in the roughelflord1973 is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Keegan View Post
But it's got a major flaw in that it takes all it's data from the 20 largest markets in the US. The 20 most heavily populated cities. I contend those cities are not a benchmark for the rest of the nation.
I partly agree with you. Those cities are a benchmark for those cities.

People who work in Manhattan, like myself, are very interested in the NY Metro numbers, because these are a broad average of counties near Manhattan (basically all that a sane person commuting to NY would consider, and some a bit further out)

Quote:
That being said, I'd also ask how CS "predicts" future values. What data does it look at to decide in what direction and by how much the prices will move. I'll admit I've not studied the CS methodology, but on the surface it simply says the downward trend will continue at the same angle. Why do they believe that to be the case? Why do you?
The index itself doesn't predict future values.

There is a market for predicting future values of the Case Shiller index on the CME exchange (where futures are traded)

Basically, it lets you "buy" the Case Shiller index at a future date. The (futures) contract at expiry pays the difference between the actual index at expiry, and the value that was agreed to when the contract was entered into.

So recent futures prices of the contract reflect a market consensus on the future value of the Case Shiller index.

http://http://www.cmegroup.com/trading/real-estate/files/spcaseshiller_fact_card.pdf

Here's the market last time I checked for NY metro

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2009, 10:16 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
1,067 posts, read 638,974 times
Reputation: 332
GiantRutgersfan is a jewel in the roughGiantRutgersfan is a jewel in the roughGiantRutgersfan is a jewel in the roughGiantRutgersfan is a jewel in the roughGiantRutgersfan is a jewel in the roughGiantRutgersfan is a jewel in the roughGiantRutgersfan is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by DodgeViper01 View Post
I agree with Bill but I am almost 100% sure that unless we have some major event this is not going to happen. And besides with the tax credit for first time buyers and the LOW 5% interest rates, you can save a lot more now than ever before. If you buy a house now for $25K more than next year but interest rates are 6% next year, you are still coming out ahead $20K at the end of the mortgage.

prices are not going to go up anytime soon tho. Interest might go up however. but you can always refinance so it isnt nearly as important as the price
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



Reply


Quick Reply
Message:

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads


Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:56 PM.

Copyright © 2005-2009, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 - Top