Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I think parts of Rt 1 could really use it. There is a lot of road work going on near Menlo Park Mall. But it's been ongoing for years I feel like, and I still don't see a third lane. Not quite sure exactly what they're doing there.
This is done and all lanes are open, it'f really nice.
agreed, if for no other reason than scheduling. just as is the case with carpooling/vanpooling, people are just too busy to have a rigid schedule constrain their movement.
Quote:
Originally Posted by NatasNJ
A mixture of both is needed, but mass transit should be the leader of the two.
NJ is, for lack of a better word, decentralized. there are a few biggish employment centers, but mass transit will never account for more than 50% of the transportation methods chosen by commuters/travellers.
Location: Splitting time between Dayton, NJ and Needmore, PA
1,184 posts, read 4,044,370 times
Reputation: 767
Quote:
Originally Posted by mtoneil
I think parts of Rt 1 could really use it. There is a lot of road work going on near Menlo Park Mall. But it's been ongoing for years I feel like, and I still don't see a third lane. Not quite sure exactly what they're doing there.
As someone else said, this is now finished. It's actually quite nice to drive through there.
I really wish DOT would
Quote:
Originally Posted by gradstudent77
The answer to traffic jams is mass transit, not more lanes or roads.
Mass transit works in cities, not suburbia.
Regional train stations and bus terminals still require feeder roads into and out of them for parking of cars. See the one down on Rte. 130 just above Cranbury for a reality check.
And for all the grandiose talk about mass transit, how come the MOM line was killed off? Especially when the tracks are already in place because there used to be such a line back in the 20's through the 50's.
My pet peeves are Route 1 through South Brunswick and the entire length of Route 130.
Route 1
I understand the powers that be in the 70's and 80's wanted to control growth in South Brunswick along Route 1 by keeping the artery a two-lane road on each side with minial third lanes for turn offs at certain intersections. But this has become a major hazard for local residents. Trucks and cars alike are using those third lanes at the lights to try to get ahead of the packs.
I know they are doing the feasiblity study now to enlarge the road to three lanes each side all the way through. I hope they recognize that the need is very present for an overpass at Ridge Road, New Road, and Route 522 and a system of local and express lanes similar to what is being finished with Route 18 throughout the area.
Route 130
How about actually rebuilding Route 130 from North Brunswick High School to Camden? The road surface is atrocious with years of hotpatch being used on concrete.
How about closing off those damn median cuts and instituting a service road that would get local residents onto the highway reasonably and get rid of most of the traffic lights so 130 could really be a support route for those stuck on the NJ Turnpike and Route 1.
How about getting rid of the Hightstown Circle and instituting some management overpasses at the larger intersections so there can be legitimate spaces for U-turns?
A quote I heard some time ago . . . Adding additional lanes to roads is like buying bigger clothes for an obese person. It solves nothing and doesn't address the real problem.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.