Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-09-2009, 10:29 AM
 
Location: Marion County, FL
1,288 posts, read 2,893,094 times
Reputation: 554

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by elflord1973 View Post
Officially, we're not really "subsidizing" their pensions because they contribute to the state pension fund (about 5% or so of their salary).

Depending on the age at which they entered the system, it could be more.

Unofficially, the pension needs an 8% return to be well funded, and they need to find a way to top it up if the stock market tanks -- so the real subsidy here is that the tax payer is taking on the downside risk of the pension fund investments.
Blame dear Christie Whitman for raiding the pension fund in the 90s and lowering the percentage of the takeout -- which state/county/municipal employees had to then make up with doubled deductions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-09-2009, 10:29 AM
 
Location: Montgomery County, PA
2,771 posts, read 6,275,311 times
Reputation: 606
Quote:
Originally Posted by KathyA11 View Post
And they pay into BOTH systems. Nice, big, hefty chunks of each paycheck.
No, it's not hefty at all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-09-2009, 10:30 AM
 
Location: Marion County, FL
1,288 posts, read 2,893,094 times
Reputation: 554
Quote:
Originally Posted by luckyshoes View Post
See, I thought their safety net was through their union stuff (pension for retirement, disability insurance like AFLAC, etc).

Neither is a union benefit. The pension is administered by the state; AFLAC is an option offered by the employer, at the state/county/municipal level.

The taxpayers are subsidizing their pensions if they aren't paying enough in as you said.
That's not the employee's choice. The percentages are set by the state.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-09-2009, 10:32 AM
 
Location: Marion County, FL
1,288 posts, read 2,893,094 times
Reputation: 554
Quote:
Originally Posted by elflord1973 View Post
No, it's not hefty at all.
Really? As a municipal employee, they were hefty deductions from my paycheck every two weeks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-09-2009, 10:35 AM
 
Location: Montgomery County, PA
2,771 posts, read 6,275,311 times
Reputation: 606
Quote:
Originally Posted by KathyA11 View Post
Blame dear Christie Whitman for raiding the pension fund in the 90s and lowering the percentage of the takeout -- which state/county/municipal employees had to then make up with doubled deductions.
I blame the system. The system is designed to be underfunded. The most attractive feature of defined benefit plans is that you can commit a supersized accounting fraud by passing off risky stock market returns as risk free.

Even when Corzine raised contributions to 5%, that was a step in the right direction but still woefully inadequate.

Now that the economy and stock market have gone down, they've stopped paying in money (at exactly the time you should be putting money in)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-09-2009, 10:40 AM
 
Location: Montgomery County, PA
2,771 posts, read 6,275,311 times
Reputation: 606
Quote:
Originally Posted by KathyA11 View Post
Really? As a municipal employee, they were hefty deductions from my paycheck every two weeks.
What you do or don't consider "hefty" is beside the point (btw, 5% is hardly "hefty" anyway -- 401k plans for example max out at 16,500)

The point is that they are passing off a risky stock market return as risk free.

That is, your benefits are risk free (the government promises them to you), but the market returns are not risk free. So the tax payer is essentially giving you free insurance on your retirement portfolio. That insurance is a huge off-balance liability for the tax payer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-09-2009, 10:44 AM
 
1,235 posts, read 3,953,941 times
Reputation: 277
Quote:
Originally Posted by nemmert View Post
I'm not sure what your point is... we ALL pay into both (well, those worried about retiring)... we in the private sector pay into Social Security AND pay into our 401(K) but guess what? We don't get a gauranteed return on our 401(K)! Maybe we win, maybe we lose, the risk is ours... the problem is, with those damn unions, their risk is ours too!
Exactly. Thank you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-09-2009, 10:45 AM
 
1,235 posts, read 3,953,941 times
Reputation: 277
Quote:
Originally Posted by KathyA11 View Post
It looks rosy -- but when you deal with taxpayers on a daily basis, it's not the fun and games you think it is. Oh, there are some nice people, but the majority treat you like dirt. I've been cursed at, threatened, and called more names than I can remember -- and these were people I was trying to help.
Oh. Please. Cry me a freaking river.

The worst people I have ever met in a customer service sense are the people who work in government. Everyone knows that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-09-2009, 10:47 AM
 
1,235 posts, read 3,953,941 times
Reputation: 277
Quote:
Originally Posted by KathyA11 View Post
Why do childless and retired people continue to pay school taxes?
Because my children are going to be working to pay for all these people's Social Security AND fat pensions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-09-2009, 10:48 AM
 
1,235 posts, read 3,953,941 times
Reputation: 277
Quote:
Originally Posted by KathyA11 View Post
Ah, the damned unions -- the entities that were responsible for the 5-day workweek, paid holidays and vacations, paid sick time, paid jury-duty time -- yeah, they're always the bad guys.

Instead of blaming unionized workers for what the unions fought for, why not try to unionize your own workplace?
The problem is when unions ask for things that the people in the community don't even get, the people in the community tend to feel a little cranky about it.

Example, if my co-pay is 40 bucks a visit, and I hear teachers griping about a ten dollar co-pay, I have little sympathy.

on and on
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:09 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top