Quote:
Originally Posted by jiminnm
I expect that the decision will be appealed, and will likely be held in abeyance until the appeals are exhausted. That would mean another year, maybe two, before any changes actually occur (assuming the decision is upheld). During that time, the legislature should act to change the system that has been found unconstitutional (but, this is NM).
Recent buyers may not see any savings. It is entirely possible that county assessors may decide to raise the assessments of everyone who has benefitted from the 3% limitation (like those of us who have been in our house for awhile), rather than lower the assessments of recent buyers. One would hope that scenario alone pushes the legislature to act.
|
The assessors can't raise the assessments above the 3% limit because the decision left that standing. Frankly, the decision seems to put the local governments in a very difficult position --court decision seeming to force a reduction for some taxpayers with no increase for the others. The only wiggle room will be in those counties where the assessor hasn't imposed the full 3% increase on the existing home owners. Surprising as it may seem, I think Santa Fe County may be one of those. Escalating prices have brought in so much money from the new purchasers that long time residents have gone considerable periods without reassessment.
If the decision stands, then the legislature will have to act at least to repeal the 3% limit or local governments will be laying off employees at least in the areas where housing prices have escalated.
Note that the lawyer thinks his clients will get their money back. It is us on the sidelines that get the short end because of the statute of limitations. This suggests that recent buyers should get their suits filed. I am calling tax lawyers starting Monday morning to find someone who is taking on a bunch of us and try to get my suit filed.