Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > New York City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-04-2011, 12:07 PM
 
2 posts, read 3,884 times
Reputation: 10

Advertisements

A friend of mine who is the owner of the house is having issues evicting a tenant. He went to court did all the premilinary proceedings and did everything that was necessary. The tenant didn't pay her portion of the rent. She was awarded a grant from the city to help pay her back pay rent now she isn't paying any rent and is refusing to leave the apartment. She has somehow managed to get a court date with the supreme court where she is going to sue the city of new york and try to not to get evicted. The tenant is horrible makes so much noise. How in the world was she able to obtain a court case with the Supreme Court?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-04-2011, 12:44 PM
 
365 posts, read 502,093 times
Reputation: 52
The.....Supreme Court?!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-04-2011, 12:45 PM
 
168 posts, read 523,536 times
Reputation: 94
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewYorker2011 View Post
A friend of mine who is the owner of the house is having issues evicting a tenant. He went to court did all the premilinary proceedings and did everything that was necessary. The tenant didn't pay her portion of the rent. She was awarded a grant from the city to help pay her back pay rent now she isn't paying any rent and is refusing to leave the apartment. She has somehow managed to get a court date with the supreme court where she is going to sue the city of new york and try to not to get evicted. The tenant is horrible makes so much noise. How in the world was she able to obtain a court case with the Supreme Court?
First, note that the action is probably before the New York STATE Supreme Court -- the LOWEST trial court in the state (NOT THE U.S. Supreme Court). It doesn't take much to FILE a lawsuit. Whether it survives summary judgement is a different story. All you really need to do is show standing and jurisdiction -- meaning that the plaintiff need only show sufficient connection to the and harm from the actions of the city, in order for a judge to hear arguments. Unfortunately your friend probably needs a good lawyer at this point. Given that he/she would be directly impacted by any findings in this lawsuit, they would probably want to file notice as an interested party and submit briefings in support of the city. It's very difficult to win a lawsuit against the city when dealing with the way they administratively carry out their duties. In cases like this, the attorney is probably just looking for an easy way to buy the tenant additional time. His next step will likely be to file a motion in housing court to stay any eviction proceedings pending the outcome of the matter before the supreme court.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-04-2011, 01:49 PM
 
8,743 posts, read 18,375,776 times
Reputation: 4168
Lesson learned here: Don't take government subsidized tenants. The idea that the government is paying most of their rent and these tenants won't/can't even pay their measly portion is ridiculous. But that's what happens....stop renting to them and you won't have this problem.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-04-2011, 01:56 PM
 
168 posts, read 523,536 times
Reputation: 94
Quote:
Originally Posted by SobroGuy View Post
Lesson learned here: Don't take government subsidized tenants. The idea that the government is paying most of their rent and these tenants won't/can't even pay their measly portion is ridiculous. But that's what happens....stop renting to them and you won't have this problem.
Actually in certain areas (i.e. properties that can't attract tenants with strong financials), some landlords actually PREFER section 8 tenants. Rent is received on time and in a reliable fashion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-04-2011, 02:13 PM
 
8,743 posts, read 18,375,776 times
Reputation: 4168
The Landlords that typically prefer section 8 tenants are those who do not live onsite, so don't care anything about the building or neighborhood, so they take anyone who shows up with a rent voucher or cash. They just want the money, the person inhabiting the building doesn't matter to them...which is why so many neighborhoods sunk.

Absentee landlords + government subsidized tenants = bad neighborhoods
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-04-2011, 03:16 PM
 
168 posts, read 523,536 times
Reputation: 94
Quote:
Originally Posted by SobroGuy View Post
The Landlords that typically prefer section 8 tenants are those who do not live onsite, so don't care anything about the building or neighborhood, so they take anyone who shows up with a rent voucher or cash. They just want the money, the person inhabiting the building doesn't matter to them...which is why so many neighborhoods sunk.

Absentee landlords + government subsidized tenants = bad neighborhoods
You're making a very silly generalization and really don't understand the true dynamics of the business. For example, I have family who owns a very well maintained and cared for building in Bushwick (read: the yet to be gentrified part of Bushwick). The property has been in the family since the 60s, and they've seen the area go from working/middle class, to projects and slums. They could redo every single unit with state of the art appliances, granite counters, etc. but there is no way that they could garner the rental income needed to make such an investment worthwhile. As a matter of fact, the building can't even attract near-market rate tenants because the area is so awful. They've tried to rent to students (unreliable and they trash the apartments), to doctors and nurses at the nearby hospital (they are good tenants, but don't stay very long), etc., but eventually found themselves with a building full of degenerates who don't pay rent. The section 8 tenants have been a godsend -- providing predictable income, and believe it or not, a lot of them realize and appreciate how lucky they are to get the assistance. Sure they have some problems (heavy marijuana use in the buildings is a biggie), but they are quiet, and always have their rent paid.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-04-2011, 04:03 PM
 
1,119 posts, read 2,653,602 times
Reputation: 890
Gee. Bring back victorfox to answer this type of questions. LOL
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2011, 05:55 AM
 
876 posts, read 2,142,107 times
Reputation: 386
Quote:
Originally Posted by PullingHairs View Post
You're making a very silly generalization and really don't understand the true dynamics of the business. For example, I have family who owns a very well maintained and cared for building in Bushwick (read: the yet to be gentrified part of Bushwick). The property has been in the family since the 60s, and they've seen the area go from working/middle class, to projects and slums. They could redo every single unit with state of the art appliances, granite counters, etc. but there is no way that they could garner the rental income needed to make such an investment worthwhile. As a matter of fact, the building can't even attract near-market rate tenants because the area is so awful. They've tried to rent to students (unreliable and they trash the apartments), to doctors and nurses at the nearby hospital (they are good tenants, but don't stay very long), etc., but eventually found themselves with a building full of degenerates who don't pay rent. The section 8 tenants have been a godsend -- providing predictable income, and believe it or not, a lot of them realize and appreciate how lucky they are to get the assistance. Sure they have some problems (heavy marijuana use in the buildings is a biggie), but they are quiet, and always have their rent paid.
The story you have of section 8 tenants is a lot different then what I hear from people who had in the past rented to section 8. I have been told it is very rare for section 8 tenants to pay their portion of the rent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2011, 07:02 AM
 
Location: Manhattan
25,368 posts, read 37,073,996 times
Reputation: 12769
Quote:
As a matter of fact, the building can't even attract near-market rate tenants because the area is so awful.
A quibble: a building can ALWAYS attract market rate tenants...that is the definition of market rate, the rent that people will pay. People will shy away from any building priced ABOVE the market, i.e., more than it is worth.
If an apartment cannot be filled at $500 and the rent is lowered to $300 and it rents, then $300 is the market (even if the landlord would PREFER it to be $500.) If the area is so catastrophic that it takes a $100 rent to get tenants then $100 is the market rent.
But there is ALWAYS a market rent and it will ALWAYS get tenants.


I only bring this up becasue it ties in so well with sellers in this down market for much of the country. We constantly hear that nobody will pay what the house is WORTH when really if the house was priced at what it INDEED was worth it would sell. EVERYTHING will sell or rent at the right price, the MARKET PRICE.


NewYorker,
What proportion of the rent due your friend is still being paid by the government under Section 8? What argument does your friend's tenant make for the aviodance of paying her share of the rent?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > New York City
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top