U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > New York City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply
 
Unread 06-12-2012, 04:14 PM
 
34 posts, read 31,314 times
Reputation: 17
Das, thats is a good idea except some work programs lead to decent jobs, I know someone who was cleaning the subway stations for a biweekly check of $179 and now makes $17 per hour @32 hours she is now self sufficent pays rent and bills. The state and government needs stricter laws, so that these people can work and eventually refuse "hand outs"

The issue is not to put out unruly residents, but where will they go, very few will find work and stay as the young lady I mentioned but the rest will end of in a shelter.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Unread 06-12-2012, 05:28 PM
DAS
 
1,549 posts, read 2,625,932 times
Reputation: 564
Quote:
Originally Posted by kryan View Post
Das, thats is a good idea except some work programs lead to decent jobs, I know someone who was cleaning the subway stations for a biweekly check of $179 and now makes $17 per hour @32 hours she is now self sufficent pays rent and bills. The state and government needs stricter laws, so that these people can work and eventually refuse "hand outs"

The issue is not to put out unruly residents, but where will they go, very few will find work and stay as the young lady I mentioned but the rest will end of in a shelter.
Did the cleaning subways work program lead to this job? Or did this person find work on their own? If it leads to them actually getting a job then it is good. But most of them are put in dead end position that lead to nothing. Most don't have the education and skills to get anything else.

There are some that do have qualifications now working in these programs because they cannot find work right now. But they are constantly looking and won't be in the dead end position working for their check for long.

Does this person fall into that category?

In my post I was referring to parents with no skills, practically no education, the type that would cause many people to want to remove the child from the home. The people that are not abusive to their children, but don't have the knowledge and organizational skills to give their child a better future.

If their checks depended on the child's attendance and grades, and required them to be their at school with the child, you would see a big change in the child's attitude towards education, because the parents attitude would change. If it did nothing else the child would get 12 solid years of education and a foundation to build on.

The way the GED test is set up today, a person cannot pass that test without 12 solid years of education. Many people go to GED classes and take that test over and over and never pass. The GED classes cannot replace the 12 years of education. Only people that were pretty smart in school and were on 12 grade level even if they drop out in 9th or 10th grade can actually pass that test.

The idea I'm proposing is not a quick fix but can save a lot of money down the line. It cost too much to put people to work, and try to straighten them out. Let's put our resources in saving the next generation. This would also employ more professionals with education and creditials that are needed to get the job done.

People with subsidized apts. on public assistance, do not end up in shelters, unless they commit crimes. Public Assistance will pay their rents.

Rent stabilized, people that have subsidized rents and are working middle class people end up in shelters before they do, if they cannot pay their rents.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 06-12-2012, 05:49 PM
 
Location: West Harlem
2,025 posts, read 708,892 times
Reputation: 865
Quote:
Originally Posted by DAS View Post

People with subsidized apts. on public assistance, do not end up in shelters, unless they commit crimes. Public Assistance will pay their rents.

Rent stabilized, people that have subsidized rents and are working middle class people end up in shelters before they do, if they cannot pay their rents.
100% true. I see this every day and it is so wrong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 06-12-2012, 08:44 PM
 
34 posts, read 31,314 times
Reputation: 17
Yes this person was working under the WEP (welfare employment program) and got hired for a full time position. I agree if the check depending on how well their kids were doing yes you will see a dramatic change.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 06-13-2012, 08:31 AM
 
Location: Harlem World
555 posts, read 253,871 times
Reputation: 284
Quote:
Originally Posted by asker2012 View Post
We all know that most of the violent crime in NYC, originates in or around housing projects.
So what if NYC was to put all of its projects in one place, with legal and (ideally) physical boundaries?
what if we developed Randall's island and put of all those project residents there?

Or maybe we can put them in the Bronx, make the whole borough a public housing project as a legal entity. We would need check-points north and south of the Bronx, and on the bridges of Randall's island.

This would reduce crime in NYC like no other measure that has ever been tried, Guaranteed!
And it would provide housing to the current public housing population!

And as rents increase everywhere else, is only a matter of time before the hipsters, gays, artist, whites, and everyone else people complain about move into this magical island you dream of because of the cheap cost
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $53,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:



Over $47,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > New York City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:08 PM.

© 2005-2013, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 - Top