Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > New York City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-27-2013, 05:22 PM
 
Location: Brooklyn, NY
2,348 posts, read 1,892,896 times
Reputation: 1104

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Borninnycliveinnyc View Post
I never go that far west
Obviously, if you don't see it, then it must not exist. Oh, and can somebody send a memo to science teachers and tell them the earth is flat and NOT round? I have no idea how they came to such a silly conclusion...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-27-2013, 09:20 PM
 
31,657 posts, read 26,539,292 times
Reputation: 24482
Quote:
Originally Posted by Borninnycliveinnyc View Post
I've forgotten more about Manhattan than you'll ever know
Then you must have been absent from class when the history of how NYC developed in particular in relation to the subway system was covered.

Long story short it was the expansion of the subway to UWS, Harlem and points north into the Bronx, and also from lower Manhattan into Brooklyn and Queens that caused much the development in those areas. Indeed some claim that the lack of subway service to Staten Island kept it "rural" long after Brooklyn and Queens became heavily developed.

Go back and research the history of Astoria, Jackson Heights, Flushing, etc.. and see the impact of the subway system.

There may not be *much* over on the Far West Side today to suit yourself, but long after we all here are mouldering in our graves that area will have changed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2013, 05:21 AM
 
Location: Between the Bays
10,786 posts, read 11,257,094 times
Reputation: 5272
^ What is the most dense and developed neighborhood in NYC that does not have direct subway access?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2013, 09:08 PM
 
3,244 posts, read 5,222,503 times
Reputation: 2551
Quote:
Originally Posted by scatman View Post
NJ Transit from Secaucus to NYC is much more than $2.50.
The NJT fare is $4.
Why anyone thinks that NYC should spend billions, to extend the 7-Line outside NYC & NY State, under the Hudson River to NJ, paralleling a existing service, then charge a buck-fifty less, is beyond me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2013, 11:13 PM
 
1,612 posts, read 2,407,429 times
Reputation: 904
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigjake54 View Post
The NJT fare is $4.
Why anyone thinks that NYC should spend billions, to extend the 7-Line outside NYC & NY State, under the Hudson River to NJ, paralleling a existing service, then charge a buck-fifty less, is beyond me.
I would certainly support it. It wouldn't parallel any existing service (and NE corridor line is at 100% capacity, so not really relevant).

But NJ would have to pay the vast bulk of the cost, because it would benefit NJ more.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2013, 10:12 AM
 
10,219 posts, read 19,120,636 times
Reputation: 10880
Quote:
Originally Posted by G-Dale View Post
^ What is the most dense and developed neighborhood in NYC that does not have direct subway access?
Yorkville.

The 7 extension to NJ was nothing but a pipe dream and it's long since cancelled.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2013, 10:30 AM
 
25,556 posts, read 23,841,689 times
Reputation: 10119
Quote:
Originally Posted by nybbler View Post
Yorkville.

The 7 extension to NJ was nothing but a pipe dream and it's long since cancelled.
It was never seriously planned. Bloomberg wanted to do it, but Joe Lhota killed the idea as being completely unworkable. the MTA, a NY entity, would have had to purchase land in NJ for the stations, train yards, and other facilities. Would NJ have contributed anything to this? Not under Christie. Therefore it was never worth the financial risk to the MTA.

If NYC wants to spend more money on trains, let them fund additional phases of the Second Avenue Subway. The West Side of Manhattan is developing just fine without an additional train to NJ. If anything else is built, let it be funded by the feds or by NJ. If the Amtrak Gateway is happens, that will have federal funding and would make the 7 train to NJ redundant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2013, 04:29 PM
 
3,244 posts, read 5,222,503 times
Reputation: 2551
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichiVegas View Post
I would certainly support it. ... But NJ would have to pay the vast bulk of the cost, be ause it would benefit NJ more.
NJ has no interest in funding an expansion of NYC's subways. NJT proposes to extend its own recently-built light rail system, which connects to both PATH & heavy rail trains to NYC.
Hudson-Bergen Light Rail
Hoboken Terminal - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exchang..._(HBLR_station)
Hudson-Bergen Proposed Expansion
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichiVegas View Post
It wouldn't parallel any existing service
This is a completely incorrect statement!
NJT & Amtrak both run trains from NYPenn, @ 33rd & 8th, to Secaucus Junction. It's one stop. PATH runs from 33rd & 6th to Hoboken.
The proposed 7-line extension from 34th & 11th to NJ would have stopped at Hoboken, on it way to Secaucus Junction.
7 Subway Extension - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
How can you even imagine, that these services would not be parallel?

Last edited by bigjake54; 12-29-2013 at 04:44 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2013, 04:45 PM
 
31,657 posts, read 26,539,292 times
Reputation: 24482
Quote:
Originally Posted by nybbler View Post
Yorkville.

The 7 extension to NJ was nothing but a pipe dream and it's long since cancelled.
Yorkville has subway access, you have to walk several blocks but it does have the IRT line. Considering the distances some have to walk in parts of Brooklyn, Queens, or even Brooklyn the hike from First or York Avenue isn't *that* bad.

My vote to the OP's original query would be Staten Island which as no subway service at all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2013, 04:50 PM
 
3,244 posts, read 5,222,503 times
Reputation: 2551
Quote:
Originally Posted by BugsyPal View Post
Staten Island ... has no subway service at all.
Staten Island Railway - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Staten_...Future_service
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > New York City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top