Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > New York City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-28-2015, 01:06 PM
 
1,302 posts, read 1,950,761 times
Reputation: 1001

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by edsg25 View Post
all the renderings of the new towers rising on 57th Street, Billionaires' Row, seem to have one thing in common: no balconies. or terraces.

no doubt this omission comes from the extremely small square footage of each floor and, I would think, from the height of the buildings (not sure a balcony would be pleasant some 90 stories up).

still….I have to wonder…

isn't outdoor space virtually essential as part of the QOL of the luxury condominium. Look at penthouses whose strongest selling point is their outdoor space.

I can't imagine wanting and spending on such luxurious places as these condos without having the ability to walk outside from my residence.

am I alone in such thought or do others question the idea of luxury condos with no balcony or terrace?
A small balcony in a high-rise is one of the most overrated amenities, in my experience they rarely get used for their intended purpose. Additionally they are ugly to look at.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-28-2015, 01:55 PM
 
Location: Chicago
6,359 posts, read 8,831,732 times
Reputation: 5871
Quote:
Originally Posted by FAReastcoast View Post
A small balcony in a high-rise is one of the most overrated amenities, in my experience they rarely get used for their intended purpose. Additionally they are ugly to look at.
Less so if recessed.

Despite being to nyc numerous times, iwas unaware balconies were rare. Id sayhere in chicago, balconies andterra es are more the norm.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-28-2015, 02:35 PM
 
991 posts, read 1,769,921 times
Reputation: 660
Quote:
Originally Posted by 85dumbo View Post
Your average billionaire probably does not care that he can't grill a hotdog on his patio. On millionaires or less care about those things.
The New York City fire code prevents the use of grillers (or any open fire) on a balcony.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2015, 07:12 AM
 
499 posts, read 793,891 times
Reputation: 624
220 Central Park South, 111 West 57th Street, and probably the Park Lane tower will all have terraces. 252 West 57th Street has lots of balconies, so the premise of the thread is flawed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2015, 09:13 AM
 
Location: Chicago
6,359 posts, read 8,831,732 times
Reputation: 5871
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arxis28 View Post
220 Central Park South, 111 West 57th Street, and probably the Park Lane tower will all have terraces. 252 West 57th Street has lots of balconies, so the premise of the thread is flawed.
I question it being a flawed premise. at 65 floors, i don't know if it qualifies for one of the super falls on 57th St.

are there any of the 1000+ ft towers that will have extensive balconies?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2015, 09:43 AM
 
10,275 posts, read 10,338,537 times
Reputation: 10644
Quote:
Originally Posted by nei View Post
Plus, they're probably part-time residences for many owners. And the owners also likely own other properties that have plenty of outdoor space.
Bingo. Anyone buying in billionaires row probably has a place in the Hamptons, or Bermuda, or wherever. They can be in East Hampton in a few minutes, via helicopter.

But some of the new towers do have outdoor space. 220 CPS has outdoor space, as does One Park Lane. In fact every unit at One Park Lane will have outdoor space.

Note too that these are terraces, not balconies. Balconies are considered undesirable in high-end Manhattan buildings. That's more associated with "commieblock" type housing from the 1960's, like something you would see in Warsaw or East Berlin.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2015, 09:47 AM
 
10,275 posts, read 10,338,537 times
Reputation: 10644
Quote:
Originally Posted by edsg25 View Post

are there any of the 1000+ ft towers that will have extensive balconies?
Yes. One Park Lane will be 1,210 ft. and will have terraces.

I doubt any high-end Manhattan buildings have balconies these days, but terraces do exist in some taller buildings.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2015, 10:08 AM
nei nei won $500 in our forum's Most Engaging Poster Contest - Thirteenth Edition (Jan-Feb 2015). 

Over $104,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum and additional contests are planned
 
Location: Western Massachusetts
45,983 posts, read 53,478,433 times
Reputation: 15184
Quote:
Originally Posted by NOLA101 View Post
Note too that these are terraces, not balconies. Balconies are considered undesirable in high-end Manhattan buildings. That's more associated with "commieblock" type housing from the 1960's, like something you would see in Warsaw or East Berlin.
Odd that a balcony would be considered negative. What do you mean by a terrace?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2015, 10:30 AM
 
Location: Brooklyn New York
18,470 posts, read 31,635,068 times
Reputation: 28009
Quote:
Originally Posted by nei View Post
Odd that a balcony would be considered negative. What do you mean by a terrace?

balcony and terrace are the same thing
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2015, 10:39 AM
 
15,843 posts, read 14,476,031 times
Reputation: 11917
There's another issue here. Balconies (possibly as opposed to roof terraces, but I'm not sure) go against a building's allowable floor area ratio under zoning. So if you build a balcony, every square foot you put outside is one less square foot you can have inside. And inside space is much more useful. When a developer is selling units for something like $7,000/sqft, every square foot counts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > New York City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:35 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top