Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > New York City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-10-2015, 10:55 AM
 
593 posts, read 465,949 times
Reputation: 1187

Advertisements

NY Times reported this waste of taxpayer money: "Mayor Bill de Blasio’s administration will spend $1 million on ads intended to promote the rent freeze enacted this year for New York’s rent-regulated tenants..."

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/09/ny...smtyp=cur&_r=3
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-10-2015, 11:49 AM
 
931 posts, read 796,193 times
Reputation: 1268
$1 million freaken dollars!!! What a waste of money that could easily be put towards helping the increase homeless population and/or public assistance to help tenants pay for arrears rent who are on the verge of getting evicted. What a dumb f**k. This goes to show how much of an idiot and selfish POS De Blasio really is.

De Blasio is using these funds to pander voters for his re-election bid. He's trying to brag about his so called accomplishments in getting a rent freeze which in reality does absolutely nothing to address the homeless issue.

NYC cannot afford to have De Blasio another 4 years. Let his first term be his last. No one likes this idiot. He's lucky he even became Mayor considering only 17% of voters voted. If people who initially supposed him during his campaign for Mayor have bailed on him. No one like him.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2015, 03:39 PM
 
Location: Manhattan
25,341 posts, read 36,840,879 times
Reputation: 12730
Advertising costs money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2015, 07:01 PM
 
31,615 posts, read 26,449,195 times
Reputation: 24433
WTF is the point of advertising something that is automatic and only affects a certain demographic of NYC renters (rent stabilized)? It does nothing but rub other persons (market rate renters) nose in it reminding them Mayor de Boob and the City Council doesn't give a rat's behind about them.

Long story short this victory lap advert is the start of de Boob's re-election campaign.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2015, 08:02 AM
 
Location: Manhattan
25,341 posts, read 36,840,879 times
Reputation: 12730
Quote:
Originally Posted by BugsyPal View Post
WTF is the point of advertising something that is automatic and only affects a certain demographic of NYC renters (rent stabilized)? It does nothing but rub other persons (market rate renters) nose in it reminding them Mayor de Boob and the City Council doesn't give a rat's behind about them.
So then, how do you feel about a rent-freeze FOR ALL? That way the "middle class" won't get their noses damaged.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2015, 08:54 AM
 
3,932 posts, read 5,035,932 times
Reputation: 4139
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kefir King View Post
So then, how do you feel about a rent-freeze FOR ALL? That way the "middle class" won't get their noses damaged.
It's absolutely sensible.
As difficult a pill to swallow as government regulations are- if rent control/stabilization is some necessary social program, it should have a clear application (process) and be available to all units across the board.
The fiscal hit landlords take would have to be backed up by city coffers.

The fact that some people will get slapped with a 0% increase while other's rent increases well into the double digits, only lets the mayoral board showcase the disparity between a protected class, and a non-protected class.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2015, 10:31 AM
 
6,680 posts, read 8,181,890 times
Reputation: 4871
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kefir King View Post
So then, how do you feel about a rent-freeze FOR ALL? That way the "middle class" won't get their noses damaged.
I think it's a Great idea.
Already renewed my lease for this year so lets go for another rent freeze for next year but this time for all!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2015, 10:43 AM
 
12,340 posts, read 26,015,727 times
Reputation: 10350
Quote:
Originally Posted by WithDisp View Post
It's absolutely sensible.
As difficult a pill to swallow as government regulations are- if rent control/stabilization is some necessary social program, it should have a clear application (process) and be available to all units across the board.
The fiscal hit landlords take would have to be backed up by city coffers.

The fact that some people will get slapped with a 0% increase while other's rent increases well into the double digits, only lets the mayoral board showcase the disparity between a protected class, and a non-protected class.
To be fair, they would also have to freeze all increases in maintenance fees for coops and condos.

There are plenty of middle class people who made a sensible decision to purchase a coop apartment, but these people still have monthly bills like a mortgage and maintenance, which in some cases (if at the beginning of the mortgage) are going to add up to more than rent.

So don't punish those forward-thinking people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2015, 10:49 AM
 
911 posts, read 1,124,810 times
Reputation: 1552
How about a property tax freeze for all as well? How about a water and sewer charge freeze for all? How about we lock in low heating oil prices for all? How about we make it easier to kick out dead beat tenants and allow landlords to garnish wages for non-payment of rent? If these requirements were met, I would glady support a rent freeze for all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2015, 12:14 PM
 
3,327 posts, read 4,335,528 times
Reputation: 2892
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kefir King View Post
Advertising costs money.
Can you please preface any of your responses on this subject with the fact that you will benefit from such an action.

The only NY'ers who support this garbage are those who stand to benefit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > New York City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top