Quote:
Originally Posted by OyCrumbler
Not even a "liberal" when it comes to immigrating policy or a good mass of policies. Do believe in actual studies and humanitarian causes though and I do know that website ain't generally reliable.
As for this topic and Watertown specifically, it doesn't seem to be so sensible to put refugees in places that small amd isolated. Syracuse and Utica certainly made a lot more sense because there's a city core that has space to take them, much larger populations so that municipal services aren't as proportionally stretched, etc. and even those might be a bit of a stretch as previously successful refugee communities were in larger cities such as the Twin Cities and St. Louis.
|
In terms of size, a city like Twin Falls ID isn't that much bigger than Watertown and is in the county with the 2nd highest rate of refugees in the country. I believe that there are others of a similar size as well. Certain areas in states like MN, WI, IA, etc can run from Micropolitan areas to major Metro areas.
Here is some more info on the topic: The majority of refugees are normally resettled in 15 states: California (which takes nearly 16 percent), followed by Washington (just under 15 percent), New York (nearly 9 percent), Florida (7 percent), North Carolina and Texas (5 percent each). Oregon, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Georgia and Arizona each accept just over 3 percent of refugees, while Missouri, Massachusetts, Minnesota and Ohio account for about 2 percent each.
How Refugee Resettlement in the United States Actually Works | The Foreign Service Journal - April 2016