Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-14-2014, 05:03 AM
 
Location: Durham, North Carolina
774 posts, read 1,857,502 times
Reputation: 1496

Advertisements

Wait ... now it's against the law for you to even know what's IN your ground water?

Dick Cheney, with all his might, money and power is doing everything he can to keep Fracking chemicals away from his drinking water... but you can't even know what chemicals they're using?

First Duke energy is polluting fresh water rivers and streams... now this?
What do they want us to drink? Perhaps the packaged and sold water they sell us?

This is being done by the people who are supposedly so against Socialism... but apparently Fascist Dictatorship is alright?

You're not even supposed to ask -- and if someone tells you what they're doing with your water, that person goes to jail???

Are the people of North Carolina okay with this?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-14-2014, 05:48 AM
 
1,029 posts, read 1,925,170 times
Reputation: 675
I'm for fracking. But this time I see no defense for this.

I want each driller to be assigned a specific inert marking chemical that they must use in their fluid that would be on public record. That way if there is an accident there is no doubt who is responsible.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2014, 06:36 AM
PDD
 
Location: The Sand Hills of NC
8,773 posts, read 18,389,033 times
Reputation: 12004
I'm for fracking as long as the frackers assume 100% liability for their fracking work. If they pollute any ground water or well water then it is their financial responsibility to make things right. If that means closing down their drilling operations well that's too bad. They should have to pay to bring clean water back to the areas they contaminated. That mean new wells or piped in city water.
You can't just drill for gas and or oil for profit without being responsible for your environmental impact.

Does anybody know if they plan on fracking in McCrory's neighborhood?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2014, 06:45 AM
 
Location: The 12th State
22,974 posts, read 65,522,515 times
Reputation: 15081
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich6896 View Post
I'm for fracking. But this time I see no defense for this.

I want each driller to be assigned a specific inert marking chemical that they must use in their fluid that would be on public record. That way if there is an accident there is no doubt who is responsible.
Bingo you hit the nail on the head the true underlying reason for this bill as Im very skeptical its over trade secret. If their is accident, contamination to H20, birth defects or deformities or future possible cancer related symptoms to either human, aquatic or mammal life and even vegetation like crops we eat and contamination to wells that majority homes have in near these it going to become more difficult to challenge.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2014, 07:46 PM
 
Location: TUS/PDX
7,824 posts, read 4,564,588 times
Reputation: 8853
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich6896 View Post
I'm for fracking. But this time I see no defense for this.

I want each driller to be assigned a specific inert marking chemical that they must use in their fluid that would be on public record. That way if there is an accident there is no doubt who is responsible.
I would be willing to bet lunch for everyone on CD that these "proprietary" chemical formulas already contain some manner of markers. Why? If there's some horrible mishap, you, your liability attorney and your insurance company are going to want to have ironclad proof it wasn't your fault little babies are catching on fire and whatnot. Guaranteed if it hit the fan, the drilling companies would miraculously (and in front of a judge in a closed hearing) be able to prove the chems weren't theirs' and, to have your cake and eat it too, build a strategy if it was your actions at fault.

This new law simply insures the general public will be kept out of the loop and unable to hold these parties responsible for their actions unless they're willing to engage in long and expensive private litigation.

Last edited by take57; 07-14-2014 at 07:57 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2014, 08:54 PM
 
3,950 posts, read 5,090,473 times
Reputation: 2569
I'm seriously considering moving out of NC and up to New Hampshire because of nonsense like this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-15-2014, 05:25 AM
 
1,029 posts, read 1,925,170 times
Reputation: 675
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grizzmeister View Post
I'm seriously considering moving out of NC and up to New Hampshire because of nonsense like this.
Average snowfall concord NH. 60 inches. Step off the ledge.....come toward me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-15-2014, 07:05 AM
 
3,950 posts, read 5,090,473 times
Reputation: 2569
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich6896 View Post
Average snowfall concord NH. 60 inches. Step off the ledge.....come toward me.
Versus the oppressive heat and humidity of North Carolina summers. I'm jumping, bro.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-15-2014, 01:16 PM
 
3,375 posts, read 6,260,206 times
Reputation: 2453
And no one expects this from a long time Duke Energy employee?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2014, 08:29 PM
 
Location: Durham, North Carolina
774 posts, read 1,857,502 times
Reputation: 1496
Default In light of all the documented hazards to land and water??

In light of all the documented hazards to land and water that results from Fracking ... the only reason I can see being "for fracking" is profit.

SAD.
Soooo sad.


But this is even worse than potential hazards.
We all are aware of corruption ... and how consuming it is today.

"Just Trust Me" ... really?

What idiot puts that in front of all the potential hazards associated with fracking???

Really??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:01 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top