Quote:
Originally Posted by poppydog
Because personally I'd rather see a unique local retailer in walkable areas and leave the chain stores to the massive parking lots. I just think it's boring and corporate and predictable and taking away from something that could be great with locally owned businesses in there. BUT whether it's Target or a local shop, I still don't think having a store downtown is the major defining characteristic of an urban center. I was responding to this statement:
I ask y'all, are Chapel Hill and Carrboro "urban"? I don't really think so. They're walkable and I love that, but I wouldn't classify them as urban centers. But they very definitely do have retail, residential and business all downtown. They don't have Target, but do have wonderful non-chain retailers as well as some chains. They do have groceries. They're not urban.
|
The most healthy retail areas have a mix of national chains and locally owned shops. There is nothing at all wrong with national chain stores, but you don't want them to be the only option...that's when it becomes less interesting.
Walkability is just one aspect of urbanity. Can an area be urban without hyper-density? Yes. Can an area be urban without convenient walkability? Yes. It may not be perfect urbanity, but it can definitely be urban. I think you are defining "urban" a little too narrow. It has to do with both the built environment and the density.