Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-28-2011, 12:48 PM
 
Location: fl
2 posts, read 8,287 times
Reputation: 11

Advertisements

the only reason that they are concerned about plate covers is do to red light cams that they are putting in place every where and it isn't to make the intersections safer its to generate revenue don't let them fool you with there study's and test they say they made cause all the info that they say they got is coming from who else but the people selling the cams
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-28-2011, 12:59 PM
 
2,668 posts, read 7,159,000 times
Reputation: 3570
^ Dude, first of all, what "rights" are being taken away from you? As others have pointed out on this thread, driving is a privilege, not a right. If you don't follow the rules, you lose the privilege.

Second, you have no right to cover the information on your license plate, so nothing is being taken away from you.

Third, punctuation is your friend.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2011, 09:08 AM
 
Location: NC
2,023 posts, read 3,239,881 times
Reputation: 3203
I don't see what the big deal is. The last time my car needed servicing, I took it to the dealersip and they advised me about the new law, removed the old cover, and replace it with a NEW much smaller license plate cover for FREE. There are much bigger things to be complaining and worrying about.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2012, 12:05 PM
 
1 posts, read 2,276 times
Reputation: 10
I got pulled over for it last night and the officer said the frame is fine it is the plastic cover that obscures their view of the plate. She just asked me to take the cover off and I asked if the frame was ok, she said fine its the covering of the numbers and registration tags. I did a little research and they are making covers that make it impossible to get readings from laser radar, so they made a law to have them all made allegal. The frame is fine it's the clear or smoked plastic covering the plate....google it..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2012, 06:32 PM
 
5,150 posts, read 7,764,935 times
Reputation: 1443
Quote:
Originally Posted by scott024 View Post
I got pulled over for it last night and the officer said the frame is fine it is the plastic cover that obscures their view of the plate. She just asked me to take the cover off and I asked if the frame was ok, she said fine its the covering of the numbers and registration tags. I did a little research and they are making covers that make it impossible to get readings from laser radar, so they made a law to have them all made allegal. The frame is fine it's the clear or smoked plastic covering the plate....google it..
I don't think it has anything to do with radar or what the material is. If the cover was ultra clear plastic like they sell at Wal-Mart (I doubt Wal-Mart is going to sell anything illegal) then it would be fine. But if the letters and stickers are obscured by plastic or anything else then you can get in trouble.

If you had a clear plate that wasn't illegible then the cop was being a hard ass and had no right to stop you and tell you to remove it. Still, like headlights, plastic plate covers will tend to yellow or otherwise make the characters unsharp so I've decided not to use one. I removed the frame too because it was from the dealer and he didn't pay me to advertise.

Here's the actual law:

(g) Alteration, Disguise, or Concealment of Numbers. – Any operator of a motor vehicle who shall willfully mutilate, bend, twist, cover or cause to be covered or partially covered by any bumper, light, spare tire, tire rack, strap, or other device, or who shall paint, enamel, emboss, stamp, print, perforate, or alter or add to or cut off any part or portion of a registration plate or the figures or letters thereon, or who shall place or deposit or cause to be placed or deposited any oil, grease, or other substance upon such registration plates for the purpose of making dust adhere thereto, or who shall deface, disfigure, change, or attempt to change any letter or figure thereon, or who shall display a number plate in other than a horizontal upright position, shall be guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor. Any operator of a motor vehicle who shall willfully cover or cause to be covered any part or portion of a registration plate or the figures or letters thereon by any device designed or intended to prevent or interfere with the taking of a clear photograph of a registration plate by a traffic control or toll collection system using cameras commits an infraction and shall be penalized under G.S. 14‑3.1. Any operator of a motor vehicle who shall otherwise intentionally cover any number or registration renewal sticker on a registration plate with any material that makes the number or registration renewal sticker illegible commits an infraction and shall be penalized under G.S. 14‑3.1. Any operator of a motor vehicle who covers any registration plate with any frame or transparent, clear, or color‑tinted cover that makes a number or letter included in the vehicle's registration, the State name on the plate, or a number or month on the registration renewal sticker on the plate illegible commits an infraction and shall be penalized under G.S. 14‑3.1.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2014, 04:06 PM
 
2 posts, read 3,777 times
Reputation: 10
I know this is an old thread but THIS is why they passed this law.

The bill is stopped for now but check out the second link to see that many cities are in fact tracking your every move!
CALL YOUR STATE HOUSE AND SENATE REPS!! NO on HOUSE BILL 348 even IF THEY WANT TO BRING IT UP IN 2015
Bill allowing photographs of license plates of drivers pulled by sponsor - Top News - The Times News

State Rep. John Faircloth, R-Guilford, has pulled from the N.C. General Assembly’s calendar a bill that would have allowed photographs to be taken of the license plates of drivers.


Faircloth pulled House Bill 348 Wednesday, leaving it in a state Senate committee on rules and operations, where it will remain and not come up for a future vote.

He was a primary sponsor of the bill, which passed the state House in May and was on its way to a third reading in the Senate. The bill, titled “Public Safety Technology/State ROW,” was referred to committee Monday after passing a second reading in the state Senate on July 16.

Faircloth said he decided to pull the bill from the calendar after concerns were raised over the technology that would have been used to photograph drivers’ license plates. Some of those concerns were voiced by Alamance County residents questioning intrusive technology being used to spy on individuals without cause.

The bill was designed to allow the N.C. Department of Transportation to enter into agreements with municipalities, counties and other governmental agencies to install “public safety technology in the rights-of-way of the state highway system.”

Faircloth said the technology included cameras that would have been installed on roadways to take pictures of driver’s license plates as they drove past. Faircloth said the DOT had planned to use the information gathered by the cameras to study traffic patterns.

He said the technology also would have allowed law enforcement the ability to track license plates, and would have been beneficial during Amber Alerts.

He said privacy issues concerning the bill continued to mount, and he decided to remove it from the calendar. Faircloth said he doesn’t intend to place the bill back on the calendar. It essentially will die in committee.

State Rep. Steve Ross, R-Alamance, was among those in the House who supported the bill. Ross said he believed the cameras would have been placed on the on- and off-ramps to interstates across North Carolina, including in the Burlington area.

Ross said the cameras would have been “tag readers” identifying license plate numbers. The DOT would have used the data to study traffic patterns to determine how to better handle traffic congestion, Ross said. The bill “had no problem” passing the state House, he said.

Ross said he understood there were “a lot of conspiracy theories” about how the cameras could have been used. Ross said the cameras would have provided a safety feature allowing the State Highway Patrol the ability to track fugitives.

State Sen. Rick Gunn, R-Alamance, said Wednesday that the bill “became more than what it was intended to be.”

Gunn said he served on a committee that had reviewed the bill. He said he supported law enforcement being able to do its job, however, privacy rights needed also to be considered. Gunn said he endorsed Faircloth’s decision to pull the bill from the calendar.

ACLU Investigation Shows Location Data Being Kept on Thousands of Innocent North Carolinians - ACLU of North Carolina -

RALEIGH – Police departments in North Carolina and around the country are rapidly expanding their use of automatic license plate readers (ALPRs) to track the location of drivers, but few have meaningful rules in place to protect drivers’ privacy rights, according to documents released today by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). As a result, the new documents reveal, many departments are keeping innocent people’s location information stored for years or even indefinitely, regardless of whether there is any suspicion of a crime.

The systems use cameras mounted on patrol cars or on objects like road signs and bridges, and the documents show that their deployment is increasing rapidly, with significant funding coming from federal grants. They photograph every license plate they encounter, use software to read the number and add a time and location stamp, then record the information in a database. Police are alerted when numbers match lists containing license numbers of interest, such as stolen cars.

“Automatic license plate readers allow the government to record the movement of countless citizens and then store that information in massive databases,” said Sarah Preston, Policy Director for the ACLU of North Carolina. “We don’t object to the use of these scanners to flag cars that are stolen or used in a crime, but our findings show a dire need to enact safeguards that will protect the privacy of North Carolinians and ensure that this technology does not lead to the routine tracking of innocent people who have done nothing wrong.”

There are currently no laws regulating law enforcement’s use of ALPRs in North Carolina. The ACLU-NC strongly supports S.B. 623, legislation that would place safeguards on ALPR use by requiring law enforcement to obtain a warrant before using or sharing ALPR data and by placing time limits on how long the data can be stored. The bill still allows ALPR data to be used for reasonable law enforcement purposes such as checking license plates against databases to make sure a vehicle hasn’t been stolen or involved in a crime.

Last summer, the ACLU-NC sent public records requests to law enforcement agencies throughout North Carolina and found that at least 11 use ALPRs. They are the Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Department, Durham County Tax Administrator, Fayetteville Police Department, Greenville Police Department, High Point Police Department, Jacksonville Police Department, Raleigh Police Department, Washington Police Department, Wilmington Police Department, Wilson County Sheriff’s Office, and Wrightsville Beach Police Department.

The results and analysis from North Carolina and 37 other states are detailed in an ACLU report released today called “You Are Being Tracked,” which includes charts and policy recommendations. The study found that not only are license plate scanners widely deployed, but few police departments place any substantial restrictions on how they can be used.

Among the findings in North Carolina:

Many N.C. law enforcement agencies keep ALPR data for very long periods of time, from indefinitely (Washington) to 18 months (Charlotte-Mecklenburg), one year (Durham County and Wilson County) or six months (Raleigh).
The Washington P.D. reported 585,000 plate reads between April 2010 and August 2012, approximately 20,000 per month.
The High Point P.D. reported 70,289 plate reads between August 2011 and June 2012. Of those reads, only .08% resulted in “hits.”
Some departments have taken proactive steps to self-regulate their ALPR use. The Jacksonville P.D., for example, retains data for only 30 days and does not allow third parties to access its data. This has not prevented them from using ALPRs as an important law enforcement tool.
The ALPR vendor for Charlotte-Mecklenburg uses a slideshow that compares ALPR data to the collection of coins in Super Mario Brothers video games: “the more you capture, the farther you get in the game!”
The ACLU report released today has over a dozen specific recommendations for government use of license plate scanner systems, including: police must have reasonable suspicion that a crime has occurred before examining the data; unless there are legitimate reasons to retain records, they should be deleted within days or weeks at most; and, people should be able to find out if their cars’ location history is in a law enforcement database.

The report, an interactive map with links to the documents, and an interactive slide show are available at: http://www.aclu.org/alpr
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:58 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top