U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
 
 
Old 05-03-2010, 03:32 PM
 
16,623 posts, read 14,361,751 times
Reputation: 11492

Advertisements

the only thing i'm aware of that is proven to correlate with "size" across human population, is race.

so if Mississippi, Louisiana, SC, Alabama, et cetera, aren't at the top of the list, then I don't see how they could be using adequate data. It doesn't help that this is a no-name company, with no explanation of the methodology.
Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-03-2010, 05:20 PM
 
Location: Lansing, MI
2,736 posts, read 3,525,344 times
Reputation: 2763
2nd that NC & SC men are being honest!

This article is ridiculous, but I got a good laugh from it!
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2010, 07:36 PM
 
Location: Living near our Nation's Capitol since 2010
1,571 posts, read 1,586,646 times
Reputation: 3048
Hmm....guess some statistician has too much time on his/her hands.

Note to self: Cancel the trip to Wyoming <G> Toooo funny!
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2010, 08:22 PM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
8,188 posts, read 10,803,835 times
Reputation: 7782
Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
the only thing i'm aware of that is proven to correlate with "size" across human population, is race.
I'm not aware that this has actually been "proven", just anecdotally.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2010, 11:23 PM
 
1,065 posts, read 1,747,693 times
Reputation: 769
Funny to me............. Too bad all the Northerners are coming down here skewing our numbers.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2010, 11:33 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
8,188 posts, read 10,803,835 times
Reputation: 7782
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike052082 View Post
Funny to me............. Too bad all the Northerners are coming down here skewing our numbers.
Well, that should just make you, um "stand out" more, right?
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2010, 11:50 AM
 
3,002 posts, read 4,579,161 times
Reputation: 1930
also, based on teen pregnancy and single parents rates in NC. Alot of people here aren't using condoms.

Quote:
Originally Posted by anifani821 View Post
Well now let's just think this through. These stats are from folks who sell condoms, so all they can "measure," as it were, are their sales, right? So the premise is . . . one can determine physical characteristics depending on volume of sales of different sizes of condoms.

This is just another case of manipulating statistics to make a case for whatever it is the publisher wishes to convey.

First of all . . . not everyone uses condoms.

And statistics show that over 500,000 vasectomies are performed annually in the USA. That's a whole lot of guys who may be in committed relationships and aren't using condoms.

So . . . just b/c folks are purchasing condoms, that doesnt mean they are the only folks having sex, lol.

The chart is totally worthless . . . the only thing it might be helpful in would be for vendors to decide what size of condoms they may need to stock based on past sales.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2010, 11:59 AM
 
Location: Yellow Brick Road
35,568 posts, read 43,752,701 times
Reputation: 20246
Quote:
Originally Posted by macjr82 View Post
also, based on teen pregnancy and single parents rates in NC. Alot of people here aren't using condoms.

Actually, NC is not at the top of that chart.

Latest stats, from 2006:

New Mexico had the highest teenage pregnancy rate (93 per 1,000), followed by Nevada, Arizona, Texas and Mississippi. The lowest rates were in New Hampshire (33), Vermont, Maine,Minnesota and North Dakota.

Also:

Teenage abortion rates were highest in New York (41 per 1,000), New Jersey, Nevada, Delaware and Connecticut.

One could infer that the NE had the most unwanted teenaged pregnancies, as they got the most abortions per 1000.

www.guttmacher.org/pubs/USTPtrends.pdf
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2010, 10:47 PM
 
3,002 posts, read 4,579,161 times
Reputation: 1930
Yeah, but NC is number 9 in teen pregancy and number 42 based on condom sales. Far from scientific, but see the correlation? Not saying they are realted, but ass they like to say "it warrants further study"

Top 10 States With Highest Teenage Pregnancy and Birth Rates
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2010, 12:02 PM
 
Location: Lake Norman, NC
5,954 posts, read 6,887,628 times
Reputation: 27609
Well now I just may feel guilty if I move out of state and the average drops that much further!!!
Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


 
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Options
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2011 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $84,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2014, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 - Top