U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Northeastern Pennsylvania
 [Register]
Northeastern Pennsylvania Scranton, Wilkes-Barre, Pocono area
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Closed Thread
 
Unread 06-22-2008, 06:19 PM
 
15 posts, read 21,780 times
Reputation: 12
Default Who

“According to the World Health Organization, breathing second-hand or passive smoke causes lung cancer, increasing the risk by 20 to 30 percent. Approximately 53,000 non-smokers in the U.S. die each year from exposure to passive smoke.

Prolonged exposure to second-hand smoke also will increase your risk of coronary heart disease by 25 to 30 percent, and has been linked to an increased risk of stroke and other illnesses.”


First one must understand a 20-30% increased risk does not equate to a 20-30% chance. Relative Risk=RR, a RR of 1.0 is 0 risk a 1.30 is a 30% risk. In science any RR below a 2.0 or even 3.0 is considered unreliable. Under a 3.0 a RR is suspicious as confounders,bias and prejudice may be at work. A 3.0 would be a 300% risk from 0 not a 300% chance it will occur.
The 53,000 number is a made up number. That number originated from 3,000 that was stated in the 1992 EPA report. That report was lambasted by federal Judge Osteen in 1998. His 90 page ruling stated the EPA committed to that number before it conducted it's meta analysis of studies that that chose to analyze, they left out studies that were contrary to their objective. They still could not estimate a number of 3,000 until they reduced the confidence level from a 95% to a 90%. 95% confidence level is the norm in scientific studies.
Remember risk alone causes nothing, something else must happen. You risk getting into an auto accident on the road but something else must happen before it occurs.
Notice the term linked, that is not conclusive.
Anti smoker organizations and people twist data and language to manipulate thought.
The WHO attempted to bury their own study in 1998, The multi-case study. That study showed children who grew up with two smoking parents had a RR of .78% in getting lung cancer, that is a protective risk meaning 22% less risk.

The former Surgeon General Carmona issued statements and press releases, that were not supported by the Surgeon General report. That report was also a meta analysis of previous studies to include some used in the 1992 EPA report. He left out studies that were counter to his personal anti smoking stance. The largest study ever done ,Enstrom & Kabat concluded In a large study of Californians followed for 40 years, environmental tobacco smoke was not associated with coronary heart disease or lung cancer mortality at any level of exposure.
That study like other opposing views were left out of the meta analysis.

Other anti smoking advocates have criticized the Surgeon General report. Dr. Elizabeth Whelan, president of the American Council on Science and health had this to say about the Surgeon General report "Contains mix of facts, speculation, and downright hyperbole."

I further suggest you investigate the mission of the WHO. Also see how they allowed millions to die of Malaria for the new world order.

Smoking bans are being used as a tool for social engineering and will use any means to accomplish their goal.

Science as an enterprise may be objective; scientists as individuals are not.

 
Unread 06-22-2008, 06:30 PM
 
15 posts, read 21,780 times
Reputation: 12
[quote=The Commish;4194161]Science has gotten better since 1975, 33 years ago.



Science has gotten better since 1975, 33 years ago.

You sure missed that point. They came up with a plan to create an atmosphere. They have done that without science. Read my previous post.
Yes, science has gotten better but it has not proven the propaganda of the WHO.
 
Unread 06-22-2008, 07:59 PM
 
703 posts, read 854,326 times
Reputation: 226
For this thread, they really seem to be coming out of the woodwork, don't they?

Guys, the scientific consensus is clear and the evidence is overwhelming:

Quote:
Currently, there is widespread scientific consensus that exposure to secondhand smoke is harmful.[84] The link between passive smoking and health risks is accepted by every major medical and scientific organization, including:

The World Health Organization[85]
The U.S. National Institutes of Health[86]
The Centers for Disease Control[87]
The United States Surgeon General[88]
The U.S. National Cancer Institute[89]
The United States Environmental Protection Agency[90]
The California Environmental Protection Agency[3]
The American Heart Association,[91] American Lung Association,[92] and American Cancer Society[93]
The American Medical Association[94]
The American Academy of Pediatrics[95]
The Australian National Health and Medical Research Council[96]
The United Kingdom Scientific Committee on Tobacco and Health[97]
The governments of 151 nations have signed and ratified the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, which states that "Parties recognize that scientific evidence has unequivocally established that exposure to tobacco smoke causes death, disease and disability."[98]
Who are you kidding? Is this some sort of conspiracy between every major medical organization? On one side we have every. major. medical organization. On the other we have "some guy on the internet."

 
Unread 06-22-2008, 08:42 PM
 
15 posts, read 21,780 times
Reputation: 12
LOL, LOL
Another ad hominem comeback. Join the ranks of the defeated on this thread. You did not even look into the WHO, a socialist organization.
I guess you do not care to investigate at all. You trust the "authority as the truth" rather than the "truth as the authority".
Since when is consensus science? A scientific fact can be replicated anywhere, a consensus is mere opinion.
Follow the money as usual. Who profits from smoking bans?...The drug companies. Who is in bed with the drug companies?....every, major. medical organization. Don't forget media, where the drug companies spend millions to advertise.
Who loses from smoking bans?...freedom of all.
The guy on the internet is a guy well learned on the topic. The one you cannot dispute with fact,so you attack the messenger. I discovered one screw up by the anti smokers and did independent investigation, you know the kind you are not willing to do. It is sheeple that follow blindly that will be the lunch of the wolves.

“…man is not free unless government is limited. There's a clear cause and effect here that is as neat and predictable as a law of physics: As government expands, liberty contracts.”
Ronald Reagan
 
Unread 06-22-2008, 09:02 PM
 
703 posts, read 854,326 times
Reputation: 226
It's a conspiracy!

 
Unread 06-23-2008, 12:26 AM
 
15,864 posts, read 8,858,613 times
Reputation: 4903
I tend to be skeptical of conspiracy theories myself. Having said that you yourself have said that you need to be skeptical of industry sponsored studies. The trouble with any of these reports by experts is its whoever screams the loudest and has the best doom and gloom news. They all have their own agenda's and the media eats it up.

It's ironic you quoted the WHO above, one thing I came across that was interesting was a study commissioned by the WHO completed in the late 90's so it's fairly recent. It was done over seven years with a very large number of people in Europe. Here's the conclusion from the abstract:

Quote:
CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate no association between childhood exposure to ETS and lung cancer risk. We did find weak evidence of a dose-response relationship between risk of lung cancer and exposure to spousal and workplace ETS. There was no detectable risk after cessation of exposure.
Multicenter case-control study of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and lung cancer in Europe -- Boffetta et al. 90 (19): 1440 -- JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute

There is also a link to the full document on that page.

I'm not suggesting second hand smoke is not bad for you, obviously anything in large doses has potential to cause harm including things that would otherwise be healthy. The point is for every study that points to one thing there is inevitably another one that says something else.
 
Unread 06-23-2008, 01:23 AM
 
15 posts, read 21,780 times
Reputation: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Commish View Post
It's a conspiracy!

LOL, LOL,
Thanks Commish for being honest enough to admit you are wrong, even though you do not surrender your beliefs. FightinPhils surrendered in the same fashion. Like any religion you are free to believe what you want, and I support that. Do not force any religion upon others with the force of law.
TheCoalman made a good point. That is the same study I cited. TheCoalman did some investigation, even though he added an editorial of his belief. Anything in moderation our bodies can handle. Proper ventilation keeps ETS in moderation. We did not evolve to be the weaklings the socialists want us to believe we are.

"The point is for every study that points to one thing there is inevitably another one that says something else."

Studies only collect information, That information can be tainted by bias and prejudice. That is why none of the claims of anti smokers have been confirmed scientifically. Commish, I know you do not investigate but at least learn what the scientific method is.
I cannot waste much more time trying to educate the illiterate so please try to investigate for yourselves. Depend on the "experts" and you will be dependent. That goes back to the original obsession here, Goebbels said tell a lie often enough and people will believe it. Oh, Goebbels, for the uninformed, was Hitler's( Nazi ruler) minister of propaganda.

Last edited by herefreeman; 06-23-2008 at 01:46 AM..
 
Unread 06-23-2008, 02:28 AM
 
15,864 posts, read 8,858,613 times
Reputation: 4903
I forgot to mention this in my previous post and slightly off-topic. I've noticed you have proclivity to cite the wikipedia as a source of information, although its a very good source for a lot of information especially in articles that aren't political in nature the biases, inaccurate or outright falsehoods contained in many articles on that site are well documented. I'd warn anyone to make sure they have supporting information from elsewhere before citing it as a source.
 
Unread 06-23-2008, 05:59 AM
 
109 posts, read 159,875 times
Reputation: 38
(Update: As of 10/1/2007 a new Minnesota statewide smoking ban is beginning to have a negative financial impact on bars and restaurants outside of the metro area, the metro area closings started to occur after Mpls, St. Paul, and Bloomington smoking bans in 2005)
According to this 2004 end of year Star Tribune article only 14 establishments closed in '04.....the last full year without a smoking ban. (Scroll down to The party's over heading) Since implementing smoking bans the Twin Cities area has seen 150+ closings......the facts speak for themselves, smoking bans are very bad for business.
Minneapolis, Bloomington & St. Paul MN. hospitality establishments out of business since the smoking ban began 3/31/05...... 100 closed in 20 months. Updated list in no particular order (includes updates from MN Monthly, Pioneer Press, Twin Cities Business Journal, KMSP 9 news, WCCO, and more)
1) Hop's Maple Grove, MN.
2) Denny's Restaurant Plymouth, MN.
3) Copelands Minneapolis
4) TGIF Brooklyn Center, MN.
5) TGIF Minneapolis, MN.
6) Nick & Tony's Minneapolis, MN.
7) America's Original Sportsbar Mall of America Bloomington, MN.
8) Jillian's Mall of America Bloomington, MN.
9) Park Tavern Bloomington, MN.
10) Larry's Lounge in Long Lake, MN.
11) Goodfellow's Minneapolis, MN.
12) Chang O'Hara's (bankruptcy protection) St. Paul (Now the Happy Gnome)
13) Mainstreet Bar & Cafe Maple Grove, MN.
14) Bilimbi Bay Minneapolis, MN.
15) Bilimbi Bay Apple Valley, MN.
16) Bilimbi Bay Eden Prairie, MN.
17) MN Sports Cafe
18) Jacobs 101 Minneapolis
19) Café Di Napoli Minneapolis
20) Majors
21) Southtown Bingo Bloomington, MN.
22) Italiani's Plymouth, MN.
23) 3 Muses
24) 13 Moons Minneapolis, MN.
25) 510 Restaurant Minneapolis, MN.
26) Amie
27) Chez Foley Wayzata, MN
28) Chives
29) El Rey de Oro
30) Mpls. Café Minneapolis, MN.
31) Soul City Supper Club
32) Tonic of Uptown Minneapolis, MN.
33) Porter's Minneapolis, MN.
34) Molly Quinn's Minneapolis, MN. (local media covers this closing)
Breakaway Bar -(Luke is still hanging on as best he can, stop by and say hello)
35) Minnehaha Grill
36) Margarita Bella Minneapolis, MN.
37) Olive Garden
38) Knuckleheads Comedy Club Mall of America Bloomington, MN.
39) Asian Infusion, St. Paul, MN.
40) Big E.’s Soul Food, Minneapolis, MN.
41) Chet’s Taverna, St. Paul, MN.
42) Ciatti’s, Maplewood, MN.
43) Jazzmine’s, Minneapolis, MN.
44) Katsu Sushi, St. Paul, MN.
45) Le Bambou, Minneapolis 46) Mangia, Minneapolis, MN.
47) Margaux Limitée, St. Paul, MN.
48) Marketplace Café, Minneapolis, MN.
49) Red, Minneapolis, MN.
50) Rockin’ Lobster, St. Paul, MN.
51) Bobino's Starlight Lounge, Mpls, MN.
52) Wazobia Nigerian Cafe, Minneapolis
53) Waldo's
54) Player's Mall of America Bloomington, MN
55) Shamrock's W. 7th St. Paul (rumor is this one is a personal vendetta by some pro-smoking ban city council members in St. Paul against an owner who testified against the ban. In other words the city refused to extend a license on a technicality, but that's just the rumor from some St. Paul hospitality business owners, feel free to correct me on this one Mr. Thune)
56) Mojito's St. Louis Park, MN.
57) Stasius Bar Minneapolis, MN (reopened under new mgmt?) Bob Moffitt Communications Dir. for American Lung MN once referred to Stasiu's as his "old stomping grounds". I doubt he shed a tear though in realizing his role in contributing to their demise, because as the Lunger tells us no bars or restaurants have gone out of business due to the smoking bans. In fact, to hear the media & Bob tell it, none of these 76 establishments went out of business at all, they've simply closed their doors for an extended period of time to count all the profits that the smoking bans have bestowed upon them.
58) Little Jack's Minneapolis story here.
59) The Buttery St. Paul
60) Cracker Barrel Brooklyn Park, MN.
61) Perkins St. Louis Park, MN.
62) Howie G's Plymouth, MN.
63) Jake's Moundsview, MN.
64) Dixie’s Calhoun Minneapolis, MN.
65) Hamlin’s Cafe
66) Loring Grill
67) Pineda Tacos Minneapolis, MN.
68) Sidney's Minneapolis, MN.
69) Sidney's Minnetonka, MN.
70) Sidney's St. Paul, MN.
71) Sidney's Edina, MN.
72) Zeno's Minneapolis, MN.
73) Zeno's Eden Prairie, MN.
74) Louis XIII Edina, MN.
75) Bobino's Minneapolis (not same as Starlight Lounge)
76) Diner Minneapolis, MN.
77) Big City Tavern
78) Tiburon Minneapolis, MN.
79) Viking Bar Minneapolis, MN. (And now for the real shocker the uber liberal Star Tribune writes a page 2 story which attributes it demise to the smoking ban.......the Star Tribune until now seemed as though they were in the pocket of pharmaceutical nicotine interests.)
80) Sharx Nightclub Minneapolis, MN.
81) Peter's Grill Minneapolis, MN. Incidentally, Peter's Grill was one of the establishments which was about to buy Smokeeter air cleaners from me prior to talk of the smoking bans. Thank god the city council spared them from having to make that investment. 82) Mike's Bar St. Paul, MN (read more here)
83) Billy's Lighthouse Long Lake, MN.
84) Over the Rainbow St. Paul, MN. (read more here)
85) Boom Minneapolis, MN. (read more here)
86) Sophia's Minneapolis, MN.
87) Pizza Pie & I Minneapolis
88) Grandma's Saloon & Eatery Plymouth, MN.
89) The Little Wagon Minneapolis -update: reopening 3/07 under new management
90) Ricky's Loft Minneapolis
91) Bennigan's Maplewood, MN.
92) Homestead Restaurant Golden Valley, MN.
93) Pickle's Lounge St. Paul, MN.
94) LeVain Minneapolis this closing is also mentioned on their website.
95) The Carousel St. Paul, MN.
96) Irv's Minneapolis, MN.
97) Sully's Minneapolis "...closing Jan. 31, 2007 due to drop in business because of smoking ban..." -comment provided by Sully's management to Clearing the Air in a telephone interview.
98) Main Event Bar Minneapolis
99) Odaa Minneapolis
100) Robert Lee Restaurant Minneapolis
101) Baja Riverside Bar & Grill Minneapolis. This article points out how a record number of closed bars & restaurants leads to a dangerous trend of unsafe neighborhoods.
102) Sports Break Bar St. Paul
103) The Quest Minneapolis (for those unfamiliar, this is one of the largest nightclubs in the Twin Cities, once owned by Prince) story here in City Pages
104) Five Restaurant & Street Lounge Minneapolis. The Star Tribune has the story here, but will typically remove the link within days.....the Star & Sickle is embarrassed that the smoking ban agenda, which they endorsed, is destroying the hospitality industry here in record numbers.
105) Auriga Minneapolis
106) Urban Wildlife Bar and Grill, Minneapolis
107) Popeye's Minneapolis
108) All Stars Bar Spring Park, MN
109) Westrum's Tavern Minneapolis, MN. Southwest Journal tells the story, though they don't tell you what we all know.....Judy Westrum's 40 year old business really began to decline once the smoking ban was enacted. The medias' intentional suppression of the financial damages inflicted upon the people in the hospitality industry by government smoking bans is an absolute crime.
110) Decoy's/AlleyCat, NE Minneapolis
111) Italian Pie Shoppe St. Paul, MN.
112) The Lake Inn, Minneapolis
113) Trikx St. Paul, MN closing announcement
114) Timberlodge Steakhouse Roseville
115) Andy's Garage St. Paul, MN.
116) Fhima's St. Paul, MN.
117) French Press St. Paul, MN.
118) Andy's Tap Bloomington, MN. story in the Star Tribune . But true to their pro-smoking ban agenda, the Star Tribune would never report that Andy's or any of the other 118 bars & restaurants were forced to close due to revenue losses from the smoking bans. Andy's survived 42 years in business....suddenly and mysteriously the Strib would have you believe the customer base for Andy's Tap just disappeared. With 42 years business experience for Andy's, 70 years for Porter's Bar, 40 years for Westrum's Tavern.......it must have been an unprecedented, colossal, and historic event which forced these businesses to close; and it was...........the smoking bans.
119) Backyard Bar & Grill Bloomington, MN
120) Bridgeman's, Richfield
121) Riverside Restaurant, Minneapolis
122) The Poodle Club, Minneapolis
123) TGI Fridays Brooklyn Park, MN.
124) Coyote Grille Brooklyn Center, MN. Mgmt. here holds no punches as they boldly report the smoking ban led to their demise more here
125) A Rebours St. Paul, MN. more here from the Pioneer Press (they (Pio Press) are known for removing their links within days)
126) Margaux St. Paul, MN. closing announcement here
127 ) Chico Chica St Paul, MN
128 ) Ruam Mit Thai St. Paul, MN
129 ) Cafe of the Americas, Minneapolis, MN
130) Willie's Wine Bar Minneapolis, MN.
131) Old Chicago Minneapolis, MN. (Comment from a reader) Just heard on the news that Old Chicago in DT Minnepolis will close due to the "decrease of traffic in the area." No mention of the smoking ban, but I have heard from bartenders at Old Chicago that the "decrease in traffic" started with the smoking ban.
132) Shelly's Restaurant St. Louis Park, MN has closed as announced in the Star Tribune.
133) Roberts on 10 Maplewood, MN.
134) DD's Cafe Crystal, MN.
135) TimberLodge Steakhouse St. Louis Park, MN.
136) DooLittle's Plymouth, MN.
137) DooLittle's Coon Rapids, MN.
138) TGI Friday's Plymouth, MN.
139) Copper Bleu Lakeville, MN.
140) Pizza Nea Minneapolis, MN.
141) Rush (formerly Rodeo) Cottage Grove, MN.
142) T.F. Boonies Detroit Lakes, MN.
143) Dale's Beltrami County, MN.
144) Git R Done Beltrami County, MN.
145) Mason's Beltrami County, MN.
146) Northwoods Steakhouse Beltrami County, MN.
147) Pour Willie's 71 Bar Beltrami County, MN.
148) Union Station Beltrami County, MN.
149) Ember's Mankato, MN. Co-owner Nicole couldn’t fight back tears while talking about how much she’s going to miss her co-workers and customers.
150) Larry’s Bar in Fergus Falls, MN. story here
151) The Broken Axe Moorhead, MN. Management stated by phone that the smoking ban was the greatest single contributing factor for the loss of revenue and subsequent closing. 12/31/07 was their last night of business.
152) VFW Post 8854 St. Paul, MN. (this was the last remaining VFW in St. Paul)
153) Northern Lights Bar and Grill Montevideo, MN
154) Detoy's Family Restaunt Granite Falls, MN
155) Langesson's Benson, MN
156)- Buffet Holdings Inc. Eagan, MN. owns Country Buffet, Ryan's and Tahoe Joe's brands, 626 establishments in total, files for bankruptcy.
157) - Maurer's Parkside Lounge Rick Maurer said, "... the smoking ban dealt it a deadly blow, taking away more than a quarter of its clientele." (the quote and link is to a Pioneer Press article 2/7/08, and as part of mainstream media's concerted effort not to report any negative aspects of the smoking ban; is subject to be removed at any time)
158) Back to the 50's Ramsey, MN.
159) Don Pablo's Minnetonka, MN.
160) 4 Alarm Bar & Grill Rockford, MN.
161) New Delhi Bar & Restaurant Minneapolis, MN.
162) Richard's on Main Norwood / Young America, MN.
163) Emma's Restaurant & Lounge Minneapolis, MN.
164) Cafe Limon Minneapolis, MN.
165) Chang Bang Minneapolis, MN.
166) 700 Express Minneapolis, MN.
167) Soba's Minneapolis, MN.
168) Cafe 44 Minneapolis, MN.
169) Pane Vino Dolce Minneapolis, MN.
170) Don Pablo's Eagan, MN.
171) Don Pablo's Woodbury, MN.
172) Baker's Square Plymouth, MN.
173) Oakies of Oakdale, MN. -owner Charles Senkler informed Clearing the Air "....the bottom dropped out of both food and beverage sales with the State Wide Ban....."
174) Isabel's Minneapolis, MN.
175) Baker's Square Minnetonka, MN.
176) Joe's Crab Shack Maple Grove, MN.
177) Baker's Square Burnsville, MN.
178) Baker's Square St. Paul, MN.
179) Baker's Square Minneapolis, MN.
180) Baker's Square Stillwater, MN.
181) Baker's Square St. Anthony, MN.
182) Bentley's Vadnais Heights, MN.
183) Bingo Plus Inver Grove Heights, MN.
184) Hillcrest Bingo St. Paul, MN.
185) Midway Bingo St. Paul, MN.
186) Cottage Grove Bingo (formerly Fantasy Cruise Bingo) Cottage Grove, MN. the closing of bingo halls due to smoking bans, documented here, is particularly damaging because bingo halls provided tens of millions back to the community in charitable funding for hockey leagues, little league baseball, etc.......not anymore; thanks to the Nicoderm special interests and the non-profits they funded. (By the way I personally designed and provided Cottage Grove Bingo a $35,000+ state of the art, air filtration system......theirs was the best of the best)
187) Romano's Macaroni Grill Burnsville, MN.
By the way, 187 closings are approximately 1/3 of the total liquor licenses in Minneapolis.....so you can see that it is an unusually high percentage of closings that have ocurred since smoking has been banned here.
188) Passage to India Minneapolis, MN.
189) Lotus Restaurant Minneapolis, MN.
190) Temple Restaurant Minneapolis, MN.
191) Romano's Macaroni Grill Rochester, MN.
192) Joe's Crab Shack Roseville, MN.
193) Finnegan's Pub Delano, MN.
194) Grandma's Saloon Minneapolis, MN. closing 5/22/08 -The president of Grandma's Corporation, Brian Daugherty, said legislation like the smoking ban has deteriorated the state of hospitality jobs in Minneapolis. The ironic thing here is that this quote and link comes from liberal U of M online publication the MNDaily, whose members from day one have argued that smoking bans are not to blame for hospitality closings.
195) Foundation Nightclub Minneapolis, MN.
196) Minnehaha Lanes St. Paul, MN. .....had complained in the past that the smoking ban, which took effect in St. Paul more than a year before it reached the rest of the state, had driven a primary source of income — bowling leagues — away.. more here.
197) Campiello's Minneapolis, MN. (13 year history comes to an end with its closing 6/20/08)
198) Alleygator's / Spectrum Lanes Maple Grove, MN.
199) Sweet Lorraine's Minneapolis, MN.
200) The OZ in Elko, MN.
201) The Norseman Cokato, MN.
*list of closures in Hennepin & Ramsey Counties in Minnesota since smoking ban implementation 3/31/2005, as reported by members of the public, and when possible verified with the respective city.......reports of bar / restaurant closures due to smoking bans apparently are not being reported by the Star & Tribune.....perhaps because of their editorial agenda in favor of smoking bans.
Apparently the pro-smoking ban activists lied to lawmakers and the employees who would later lose their jobs. when they stated that smoking bans were good for business.

The pharmaceutical nicotine industry which funds non-profit organizations to lobby in favor of smoking bans, continue to tell lawmakers that smoking bans are boom for business. However, the business owners previously mentioned, and laid-off employees tell a different story.
What motivates Nicoderm, Nicoderm CQ, Nicotrol, and Chantix drug makers Johnson & Johnson Company, Pfizer, and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) to continue funding smoking ban efforts? Nearly $1 billion in smoking cessation products sales annually for starters.
Johnson & Johnson’s private foundation, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF), has provided hundreds of millions of dollars to smoking ban lobbyists; such as the American Cancer Society, the American Lung Association, American Non-Smoker’s Rights, etc. The motive appears to be a rent seeking agenda, J & J’s wholly owned subsidiary ALZA manufactures Nicoderm and Nicoderm CQ for GSK; additionally J & J’s purchase of Pfizer home healthcare products unit means J & J also profits from Nicotrol product sales. Nicoderm, Nicoderm CQ, and Nicotrol products are alternative tobacco products, which directly benefit from smoking bans. Here in Minnesota, Blue Cross Blue Shield, as well as ClearWay MN crowed about the three-fold increase in demand for alternative nicotine products after smoking ban legislation was implemented. Perhaps a boycott of all Johnson & Johnson products is the proper response to their lack of ethical business practice.
But that's the dilemma our local politicians find themselves in........on the one side is the rich and powerful special interest group demanding laws that financially benefit their marketing interests.....and on the other side is the individual whose rights they were elected to uphold and serve. I guess it all comes down to a simple question: are they a servant of the people, or a slave to big money interests?

Oh.....and then there are these pesky little air quality test results that prove secondhand smoke concentrations are 2.6 – 25,000 times safer than OSHA workplace air quality standards.
Clearing The Air: Air quality testing and secondhand smoke.....an update

Clearing The Air: BMJ published air quality test results show secondhand smoke is 2.6 - 5,000 times SAFER than OSHA indoor workplace AQ regulations

Clearing The Air: American Cancer Society test results for secondhand smoke prove SHS is 532 - 25,000 times safer than OSHA regulations

Clearing The Air: Johns Hopkins air quality testing of secondhand smoke proves yet again that levels are hundreds of times safer than OSHA regulations

It's clearly time to reverse these anti-business smoking ban laws, in light of the fact that politicians are influenced by distorted and omitted data from the pharmaceutical nicotine industry and the non-profit organizations in their employ. Especially when you consider the tens of thousands of individuals now unemployed due to these onerous and unnecessary laws.
 
Unread 06-23-2008, 06:55 AM
 
Location: Scranton
2,938 posts, read 754,394 times
Reputation: 570
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
Commish, my position when this debate has ever come up is that our freedoms are slowly being eroded.
Myself, and most people who make up the 75%+ of the people in this country who do not smoke, do not view smoking bans as a freedom being eroded. I look at it as a freedom gained.....the freedom to breathe air free of cancerous carcinogens. You can argue that all laws are an "erosion of freedom," but then would you propose we become an anarchy? If you're against smoking bans, you must be against all laws.....

Anyways, people are not being told that they can't smoke....you can smoke as much as you want...just not in restaurants and indoor public places. You can still smoke outside, at home, in your car, at corner bars, etc etc. You can't even concede the restaurants so families can go out to eat without a side of smoke?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $53,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Options
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2005-2010 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $47,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Northeastern Pennsylvania
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:09 AM.

© 2005-2013, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 - Top