U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Virginia > Northern Virginia
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-01-2011, 09:45 AM
 
Location: You want kimchi with that?
8,479 posts, read 6,957,751 times
Reputation: 2212

Advertisements

Many Tysons developers aren't learning - Greater Greater Washington

this guy takes issue with Lerner's proposed new development.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-01-2011, 11:25 AM
 
Location: Fairfax County, VA
3,324 posts, read 2,694,249 times
Reputation: 1186
Greater Greater Washington; now that is a blog that all DC area people should be checking out
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2011, 08:25 PM
 
Location: South South Jersey
1,652 posts, read 2,444,816 times
Reputation: 718
Thanks for posting this, bbdad. I wasn't very optimistic about the idea of a 'walkable Tysons' *before* knowing anything about the specific proposals. But now I'm even more convinced that the only place people will be walking around in Tysons in the future will be... the interior of the mall(s), just like now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2011, 10:22 AM
 
8,512 posts, read 11,190,358 times
Reputation: 3550
What a huge waste of money to build Metro there if this is how it gets built.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2011, 12:16 PM
 
Location: You want kimchi with that?
8,479 posts, read 6,957,751 times
Reputation: 2212
but read the comments - the lerner project was proposed under the OLD tysons master plan. This may be a learning process - as one commentor said, look how Arlington learned - Clarendon was built differently than Rosslyn/Crystal City.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2011, 02:28 PM
 
8,512 posts, read 11,190,358 times
Reputation: 3550
Quote:
Originally Posted by brooklynborndad View Post
but read the comments - the lerner project was proposed under the OLD tysons master plan. This may be a learning process - as one commentor said, look how Arlington learned - Clarendon was built differently than Rosslyn/Crystal City.
It's too expensive to be a learning process. They need to redo it right.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2011, 05:05 PM
 
Location: Home is Vienna, Hokieland for School
8 posts, read 10,044 times
Reputation: 12
Just to be fair on the part of the county, this proposal was approved under the old guidelines before the Tysons Comp Plan was approved last year. County staff viewed this as not being a very good proposal, but there weren't any urban design guidelines in place that they could refer to. With that said, the Lerner proposal is definitely a huge waste of prime real estate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2011, 11:45 PM
 
Location: Polish Hill, Pittsburgh, PA
27,247 posts, read 50,686,522 times
Reputation: 12144
Short-sighted urban design in Fairfax County? Wow. You could have knocked me over with a feather! How many more billions of dollars will it take to redo the "redo" of the Tysons Corner that my prior generation screwed up?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2011, 07:28 AM
 
Location: Virginia
18,717 posts, read 17,646,057 times
Reputation: 42453
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteelCityRising View Post
How many more billions of dollars will it take to redo the "redo" of the Tysons Corner that my prior generation screwed up?
Probably the same amount of $$$ that will be spent, no matter how "good" or "bad" a plan is.

Which is not to say I like this particular plan but don't kid yourselves that a plan that's judged to be "good" at this particular point in time means money will never be spent in an area again. Get real, even the best designs will be deemed "horrid" and "must be redone" by the next generation. Needs change, tastes in urban design change, and every generation feels a need to gripe about what was done by the generation before.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2011, 07:43 AM
 
Location: You want kimchi with that?
8,479 posts, read 6,957,751 times
Reputation: 2212
Quote:
Originally Posted by dkf747 View Post
It's too expensive to be a learning process. They need to redo it right.
Given that its grandfathered under the old plan, its not absolutely clear the county can make the developer redo it. And I think its unrealistic to think there will be no learning process. I dont know of any other projects in the country quite like the Tysons rebuild, and its going to go on over decades.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Options
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2011 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $94,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Virginia > Northern Virginia
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2015, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 - Top