Since I'm once again involved in a heated thread I decided that the best thing for me to do would be to come clean in a new thread so as not to risk derailing any others from losing their "focus." I wanted to give everyone an "outlet" for us to settle our disputes once and for all. I personally want to know if there's some sort of "unspoken rule" on this forum amongst a majority of you that just because you're all happy living here means that anyone with a grievance or concern is
not permitted to freely discuss it.

Perhaps after reading the following paragraph you'll get a better understanding of the vague concept I'm trying to convey.
On the Connecticut forum a reputable member recently visited Greenville, SC and was very dismayed that the unfairly positive "tilt" of that sub-forum had deceived him into visiting a place that was by far divergent from what the "boosters" had led him to believe. When he brought this element of deceit to their attention after returning home, the very same people who encouraged him to visit criminalized him instead of offering an apology for their part in the "hype" that had led him to be deceived. Apparently they were too "proud" to admit that they had made a mistake by shutting out any and all negative commentary about Greenville.
I see the same situation brewing on this sub-forum. Why, may you ask? In the past two weeks I've been involved in several major conflicts in which I've warranted personal attacks and some nasty comments from people simply because I offered viewpoints that were divergent to their own. In MOST forums on City-Data there is a pretty healthy balance between the "boosters", the "downers", and those, like me, who have
mixed feelings, and this balance helps people considering a move into a foreign area to get a clearer, untainted picture. On this forum I've only thus far encountered "boosters." Why? Are the "downers" or those who want to provide a more
balanced outlook too terrified to speak their minds?

Do some of you not realize that by only offering positives and by telling anyone who says anything negative, to paraphrase, "go away", that you are only doing people considering moving here a
disservice? If I were moving to an area I'd surely want to know the good, the bad, and the ugly, not only the good (and don't try to tell me that there is "only" good in NoVA because that's blatantly inaccurate and makes you sound just as bad as those on the Greenville sub-forum who deceived the other member for their own benefit).
I don't know what the ultimate solution here is, but this "gang mentality" of backing each other up to eliminate a "threat" needs to stop. Yelling at me won't make me go away, as I'm not doing anything wrong, nor will calling me names. As evidence of this I posted my one thread "NoVA is Amazing," and even though the commentary was overwhelmingly positive I tried to balance it out with a few "setbacks" to keep things in perspective. To my chagrin people capitalized upon that minor negative aspect (in that case it was me worried about the "spoiled poser kid" factor in RTC) and used it to attack me again because they still had sour grapes over our first squabble about long-term land usage policies. It's as if someone could say "NoVA gets an A- in my book," and instead of being happy with that you slam the person for not assigning the area an "A." Why?
Here is my list of what I like and don't like about NoVA. As usual I suspect most will ignore the good, quote the bad, and then engage in a personal attack, even though I have listed more than twice as many pros as cons. Par for the course, I presume?
PROS:
Cultural Diversity
Economic Resilience
Ethnic Diversity
Ethnic Restaurants
Excellent Public Schools
Friendly Strangers (Perhaps Except for on this Forum)
Good Driving Skills
Intellectual Population
Lack of Urban Blight
Liberal Population
Mild Winters
Plentiful Shopping Options
Proximity to DC
Strong Police Presence
Vegetation/Lush Landscaping
CONS:
Exorbitant Cost-of-Living in Relation to Salaries
Lack of Mass Transit Options to DC
Lack of Sidewalks/Bike Lanes
Materialism
Spoiled Generation "Y"/High "Poser" Scene
Urban Sprawl/Lack of Residential Architectural "Character"
I just don't understand why those last six subjects (in addition to a few others I'm sure I'm forgetting right now) are "untouchable" for discussion purposes.

You should all be very proud that I'm a very discerning person and find NoVA to be 75%
good. Why, then, do you all continuously single out the 25% bad that I find with the area to slam me? Anyone who thinks this area is not worthy of warranting any criticism is, in my eyes, no better than the folks on the Greenville sub-forum guilty of deceiving that reputable CT member through their similar "silencing of the negatives." Like it or not I plan to be an upstanding part of your community, and I will NOT hesitate to open my mouth at town council meetings or zoning/planing commission meetings, even giving PowerPoint presentations when necessary, to try to help this area to succeed. There's no reason to harshly criticize someone because they are not 100% happy with the area that you are 100% happy with.
On most other forums people handle criticisms of their area with much more tact. Why the nastiness on here? Please, I want
honest answers. I've never singled anyone out for name-calling, but it's happened to me on here. I'm not just going to stop speaking my mind, so if some of you were hoping that the stone-walling would work I can assure you that it will
not. Perhaps some of you are used to dominating people in a "dog-eat-dog" environment in your professional lives, but if that's the case then you've finally met your match who won't back down from his principles just for the sake of decorum. There's absolutely NO valid reason why I nor any other member should feel intimidated for posting a divergent viewpoint.