Quote:
Originally Posted by New York10
Hi All,
I am making an offer on a short sale in N. VA, my broker's agreement, that I am to sign, states that I am responsible for the 3% or per MLS commission, should the seller (bank) not provide that, plus a $295 fee.
I told my agent I was concerned that if the bank paid less than 3% I would be on the hook for the difference and she told me that she would not come after me for the difference.
Question: is it standard to sign with such language or would I add an addendum stating what she mentioned verbally?
Thanks!
|
The $295 is a junk fee that is increasingly becoming common. I would guess 90% of buyers agents will waive this fee if you ask. If they don't, I'd seriously consider getting a new agent.
Your contract is with the BROKER, not the agent. So your agent is correct that SHE would not come after you, but the BROKER probably will.
Anyways, that language is pretty common. It's because banks always try to reduce buyer agent fees. Most experienced short sale agents refuse and the banks almost always cave in and pay the full 3%. Without that clause, the buyer would have no incentive to challenge the fee reduction and might put tremendous pressure on your agent and broker to reduce their fees, when in all likelihood it's probably unnecessary.
I might see if I could reduce the out of pocket fees to 2% and maybe payable over a period of time. If your agent is any good, they will probably refuse but you never know. Also, they might require any fee reduction to you is contingent upon an initial refusal of the bank's demand for a agent fee reduction.
Anyways, if the bank really insists on a fee reduction, it is really the same thing as them wanting a 1 to 3% increase in price. So you can always counteroffer with a price reduction to factor in any buyer agent fees that need to be paid.