![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 370,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 13,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads. Within the last few months our forum was cited in an article in 15 newspaper and in a story on AOL's homepage.| Search our forums (advanced): |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't think it's relevant to compare the cities of Cleveland, Columbus and Cincinnati because Columbus, unlike Cleveland and Cincinnati, annexed a lot of suburban areas. IMO, it's much better to compare their respective counties. Following are the 2006 poverty rates for the counties...
Franklin (Columbus) - 16.3% Cuyahoga (Cleveland) - 14.8% Hamilton (Cincinnati) - 14.6% Franklin County, Ohio - Poverty Status in the Past 12 Months Cuyahoga County, Ohio - Poverty Status in the Past 12 Months Hamilton County, Ohio - Poverty Status in the Past 12 Months |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
This makes no difference at all because the city of Columbus takes up almost the whole Franklin County which means the city and the county are basically the same.
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Actually, I'm pretty sure that that is Subway's point. Cities such as Columbus, Indianapolis and Louisville that have annexed most of their suburbs look better than they actually are in studies such as poverty rate, median income and crime rate when compared to cities that haven't annexed. By comparing the entire counties, as Subway did, all three places are on equal footing, as they would also be if the entire metropolitan areas were compared. IOW, if Cincy and Cleveland annexed most of their suburbs as Columbus did, their poverty rates would be much lower than they are. Another way of looking at it: if they only considered the pre-annexation limits of the city of Columbus when computing its poverty rate, it would be much higher than it is with the current post-annexation city limits.
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
I try to tell people...Columbus is right up there with cleveland and cincinnati in about everything
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
How about comparing metro areas? Which one has the highest/lowest poverty rates then?
That is surprising about Franklin County. I always assumed it was much better off than Cuyahoga. But I guess I shouldn't have been surprised because Cleveland has some very affluent suburbs within Cuyahoga County... |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have to disagree with that, I think Cleveland and East Cleveland both have way worse areas than anyplace in Columbus or Franklin County. You dont see the kind of decay you see in Cleveland in Columbus at all. and Cleveland has annexed places too, in 1950 Cleveland only took up 50 sq miles and had a population of 1 million people. Now it takes up 76 sq miles and in those 55 sq miles there are only about 300,000 people. Columbus might not be that good but to me it looks a lot better than Cincinnati or Columbus.
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Does anyone know what the poverty rate of Columbus would be if you don't include the annexed areas?
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't know what the exact poverty rate would be. Im guessing it would be around 23% poverty because some of the areas closer to downtown have lower poverty rates now then they did a while ago. And some of the neighborhoods have actually gotten better closer to downtown and near Ohio State. A couple of neighborhoods have gotten a little bit worse. Yeah I guess Columbus isnt that much better than Cleveland, or Cincinnati but it looked and felt a lot nicer than those two all the times ive been there.
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ok, here we go:
Cleveland Metropolitan Area poverty rate in 2000(this is the MSA, so it doesn't include Akron/Canton): 10.5% Akron MSA: 9.6% Canton-Massilon MSA: 9.1% Columbus MSA: 9.6% Cincinnati MSA: 9.3% Dayton MSA: 9.7% Springfield MSA: 10.4% Toledo MSA: 11.8% Youngstown-Warren MSA: 11.1% Here's the link: http://www.census.gov/compendia/smadb/TableB-04.pdf These figures are from 2000, but I doubt there has been much change since then. I really don't see any statistically significant differences between the three C's... Some of the smaller cities seem to have a higher rate of poverty, but nothing drastic. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It's free and quick. Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|