Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Ohio
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-05-2014, 03:38 AM
 
Location: Columbus, OH
220 posts, read 330,281 times
Reputation: 260

Advertisements

Ohio utilities feel burned by solar-energy users

The Columbus Dispatch Sunday November 2, 2014

"People like Jack Hedge scare utility executives. He has rooftop solar panels that generate more electricity than his house needs.

“My electric bill was zero most of the year,” the 66-year-old Worthington man said.

Utilities, such as Columbus-based American Electric Power, say their current rate structure doesn’t allow them to cover costs related to renewable-energy owners. The result, the companies say, is that the costs get passed on to other consumers.

The debate over how utilities treat rooftop solar is at the heart of a case heading to the Ohio Supreme Court.

...To fight this, utility companies and industry groups are proposing additional surcharges for solar owners. They are also ramping up a campaign to frame the issue in terms of income inequality, arguing that wealthy solar owners receive subsidies that are unavailable to the many people who struggle to pay their electricity bills."

Ohio utilities feel burned by solar-energy users | The Columbus Dispatch


Another reason electing Big Busine$$ reps & judges yesterday is a travesty for our state.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-05-2014, 09:35 AM
 
465 posts, read 658,698 times
Reputation: 281
AEP made $15 billion last year, and earnings of almost $3 per share. They now want to charge homeowners that can afford to go off the grid because they've squeezed all they can from everybody else. Something tells me they'll do just fine if they don't get more profits mandated by the government.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2014, 12:47 PM
 
Location: Shaker Heights, OH
5,295 posts, read 5,239,871 times
Reputation: 4368
You know Kasich will do so something like make it illegal to become self sufficient...or at the very least take away tax breaks for installing solar panels on your house.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2014, 06:34 PM
 
3,281 posts, read 6,276,419 times
Reputation: 2416
I'm anxiously awaiting the day that these renewable sources can completely replace fossil fuels and their powerful lobbies. It could happen soon, as long as these "capitalists" in the legacy energy industries aren't allowed to act as anti-competitive obstructionists.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2014, 05:49 AM
 
Location: Columbus, OH
220 posts, read 330,281 times
Reputation: 260
Quote:
Originally Posted by RustBeltOptimist View Post
AEP made $15 billion last year, and earnings of almost $3 per share. They now want to charge homeowners that can afford to go off the grid because they've squeezed all they can from everybody else. Something tells me they'll do just fine if they don't get more profits mandated by the government.
Well said.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2014, 09:40 PM
 
Location: Beavercreek, OH
2,194 posts, read 3,849,047 times
Reputation: 2353
If we were to get serious about reducing energy demand on the grid, we would put solar panels on top of every house and building in the whole country and route each of them to a regulator/inverter box that could combine the output of the solar panels with whatever is available from the grid.

For all the talk about solar panels being useless at night because batteries suck... why not just run a water pump during the day using your excess electricity generated and fill a tank. Place that tank high, as high as you can. At night, use the stored water in the tank to turn a turbine and generate electricity when the sun isn't shining.

Boom, I've just solved the battery problem.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2014, 11:07 PM
 
1,870 posts, read 1,901,238 times
Reputation: 1384
You are right about using water to store energy. The reservoir desn't have to be near the solar panels, however. It could be 100 miles away on a hill or mountain.

You don't need a dedicated reservoir for each home. 100 home solar installations could power the storage system.

Energy can also be stored using liquid salt or flywheels. Chemical batteries are only good for transportation needs or for UPS's.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Ohio
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:31 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top